Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm so glad my DH doesn't act like a whiney man-baby and think that being 100% in control equates to being my #1 priority. He is my best friend and we work as a team...thats why He gets all the BJs!
My DH understands why our children are #1 as they are #1 to him as well. But in the privacy of our room we do our best to make each other #1 and yes, BJ's are an important part of that as well as a bunch of other fun moves. We find time for ourselves 2-3 times a week and we make it a priority even if sometimes its just a quickie.
Anonymous wrote:I'm so glad my DH doesn't act like a whiney man-baby and think that being 100% in control equates to being my #1 priority. He is my best friend and we work as a team...thats why He gets all the BJs!
Anonymous wrote:I'm so glad my DH doesn't act like a whiney man-baby and think that being 100% in control equates to being my #1 priority. He is my best friend and we work as a team...thats why He gets all the BJs!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your spouse should always be #1. If you put your spouse after your kids, you won't have a spouse, and the kids then suffer.
As long as both parents are treating the kids as their 1.5 and their spouse as their 1. it will be ok.
+1,000.
The answers from so many on these boards shows why there are so many divorces. People have their priorities backward.
Whatever. That's how my and DH's parents were and now they are old and lonely and wondering why no one wants to visit them. After the first grandchild was born FIL openly and bitterly complained to anyone who would listen about how "no one cared about him anymore." Jealous of an infant who didn't even live with him. Pathetic.
You can't always put your kids second to yourself and your partner and expect they will continue to go along with that after they are grown. Our kids come first because we are adults. Our home is a very happy one.
(and 1.5...what the hell does that even mean? It sounds like a cop out because you know saying that your kids are 2nd to yourself and your spouse sounds unbelievably selfish).
Anonymous wrote:What does being #1 mean? Please give real life examples. By in large, my DH is #1 when it comes to the meals I prepare. If kids were #1, we'd be eating chicken tenders every night, LOL. If we are talking about tending to my kid in the middle of the night, kid gets #1 priority. Weekend plans are mixed, some kid priorities, some couple prioritites. I take priority at 5:30 am when I go for a run (unless there is a sick kid, but husband would also volunteer to deal with kid so I could run). Work takes priority if there is a deadline. Priorities shift based on the circumstances.
Anonymous wrote:What does being #1 mean? Please give real life examples. By in large, my DH is #1 when it comes to the meals I prepare. If kids were #1, we'd be eating chicken tenders every night, LOL. If we are talking about tending to my kid in the middle of the night, kid gets #1 priority. Weekend plans are mixed, some kid priorities, some couple prioritites. I take priority at 5:30 am when I go for a run (unless there is a sick kid, but husband would also volunteer to deal with kid so I could run). Work takes priority if there is a deadline. Priorities shift based on the circumstances.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your spouse should always be #1. If you put your spouse after your kids, you won't have a spouse, and the kids then suffer.
As long as both parents are treating the kids as their 1.5 and their spouse as their 1. it will be ok.
+1,000.
The answers from so many on these boards shows why there are so many divorces. People have their priorities backward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your spouse should always be #1. If you put your spouse after your kids, you won't have a spouse, and the kids then suffer.
As long as both parents are treating the kids as their 1.5 and their spouse as their 1. it will be ok.
+1,000.
The answers from so many on these boards shows why there are so many divorces. People have their priorities backward.