Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1 year is too soon, 3 years is too long.
This
And I also refuse to have my kids be anything where there is a .5. For example, I wouldn't be cool with a 1.5. 2.5 etc age gap.
I like when birthdays are around the same time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure. My kids are 4 years apart, though. The bigger age gap is awesome for us. I've gotten to really enjoy/focus on each one''s babyhood, and when I get babied-out with the little one, I can spend big-kid time with the big one.
I had the first at 33 and second at 37, so I had age somewhat on my side...I didn't feel desperate to have the second. Also, I wasn't sure I wanted a second for a long time...not until after the first turned 3.
I would have felt so old having my first kid at 33.
Is your peer group fairly uneducated? Not one of my friends had a baby before 30 due to advanced degrees and careers.
+1.
I have a law degree and am a practicing lawyer. Ivy-educated. First kid at 29, third (and last) at 33. Sorry to disappoint.
Being so well educated, seems like you would have known it's not healthy to have kids so close together.
Sounds like they were all two years apart. Isn't that what WHO recommends?
Anonymous wrote:1 year is too soon, 3 years is too long.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure. My kids are 4 years apart, though. The bigger age gap is awesome for us. I've gotten to really enjoy/focus on each one''s babyhood, and when I get babied-out with the little one, I can spend big-kid time with the big one.
I had the first at 33 and second at 37, so I had age somewhat on my side...I didn't feel desperate to have the second. Also, I wasn't sure I wanted a second for a long time...not until after the first turned 3.
I would have felt so old having my first kid at 33.
Is your peer group fairly uneducated? Not one of my friends had a baby before 30 due to advanced degrees and careers.
+1.
I have a law degree and am a practicing lawyer. Ivy-educated. First kid at 29, third (and last) at 33. Sorry to disappoint.
Being so well educated, seems like you would have known it's not healthy to have kids so close together.
Anonymous wrote:+1.
Not sure what motivates people to call other moms old in a thread about spacing. TBH, I felt old when I had my first at 33, but now that he is sleeping through the night and I got my body back a bit, I felt young again!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure. My kids are 4 years apart, though. The bigger age gap is awesome for us. I've gotten to really enjoy/focus on each one''s babyhood, and when I get babied-out with the little one, I can spend big-kid time with the big one.
I had the first at 33 and second at 37, so I had age somewhat on my side...I didn't feel desperate to have the second. Also, I wasn't sure I wanted a second for a long time...not until after the first turned 3.
I would have felt so old having my first kid at 33.
Is your peer group fairly uneducated? Not one of my friends had a baby before 30 due to advanced degrees and careers.
+1.
I have a law degree and am a practicing lawyer. Ivy-educated. First kid at 29, third (and last) at 33. Sorry to disappoint.
Anonymous wrote:Ugh. How do these threads always result in women attacking other women for their choices? Good lord I would have *loved* to have had my first baby at 33 or younger! Thanks to infertility I got one at 36 and probably won't get any more, but I'm just incredibly grateful for the one I have.
Let's support one another. *screams into the void*
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure. My kids are 4 years apart, though. The bigger age gap is awesome for us. I've gotten to really enjoy/focus on each one''s babyhood, and when I get babied-out with the little one, I can spend big-kid time with the big one.
I had the first at 33 and second at 37, so I had age somewhat on my side...I didn't feel desperate to have the second. Also, I wasn't sure I wanted a second for a long time...not until after the first turned 3.
I would have felt so old having my first kid at 33.
Is your peer group fairly uneducated? Not one of my friends had a baby before 30 due to advanced degrees and careers.
+1.
I have a law degree and am a practicing lawyer. Ivy-educated. First kid at 29, third (and last) at 33. Sorry to disappoint.
DH and I both went to Stanford, I had my kids at 29 and 31 and you sound like a godawful insufferable smug b*tch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure. My kids are 4 years apart, though. The bigger age gap is awesome for us. I've gotten to really enjoy/focus on each one''s babyhood, and when I get babied-out with the little one, I can spend big-kid time with the big one.
I had the first at 33 and second at 37, so I had age somewhat on my side...I didn't feel desperate to have the second. Also, I wasn't sure I wanted a second for a long time...not until after the first turned 3.
I would have felt so old having my first kid at 33.
Is your peer group fairly uneducated? Not one of my friends had a baby before 30 due to advanced degrees and careers.
+1.
I have a law degree and am a practicing lawyer. Ivy-educated. First kid at 29, third (and last) at 33. Sorry to disappoint.