These people can't even keep their lies straight

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this means that the Trump campaign was, in fact, colluding with the Russian government, right? Don Jr. joined this meeting thinking he could get dirt on Clinton - didn't work out that way - but both of his statements confirm that he and others joined that meeting thinking that's what they'd get from this lawyer.

First of all, we don't know that he did not get dirt on Clinton.

Second, not getting the expected goods is not a defense in all those stings against terrorists and drug dealers. So I doubt it would work here.

Has anyone in congress commented on these most recent revelations?

Prepare for Republicans to be "concerned" and "troubled." McCain, the maverick, may even escalate to "deeply concerned."

+1. Graham and Rubio are in this boat also.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this means that the Trump campaign was, in fact, colluding with the Russian government, right? Don Jr. joined this meeting thinking he could get dirt on Clinton - didn't work out that way - but both of his statements confirm that he and others joined that meeting thinking that's what they'd get from this lawyer.

First of all, we don't know that he did not get dirt on Clinton.

Second, not getting the expected goods is not a defense in all those stings against terrorists and drug dealers. So I doubt it would work here.

Has anyone in congress commented on these most recent revelations?

Prepare for Republicans to be "concerned" and "troubled." McCain, the maverick, may even escalate to "deeply concerned."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this means that the Trump campaign was, in fact, colluding with the Russian government, right? Don Jr. joined this meeting thinking he could get dirt on Clinton - didn't work out that way - but both of his statements confirm that he and others joined that meeting thinking that's what they'd get from this lawyer.

First of all, we don't know that he did not get dirt on Clinton.

Second, not getting the expected goods is not a defense in all those stings against terrorists and drug dealers. So I doubt it would work here.

Has anyone in congress commented on these most recent revelations?

Running tally of the scandal:

*During election, met with Russians in attempt to get dirt on Clinton. Discussed sanctions related issues.

*May or may not have received dirt on Clinton.

*Russians did dump dirt on Clinton during election.

*After election, Trump cabinet member met to discuss sanctions, administration denied it. Later proven true.

*Trump fired the man investigating. Original excuse turned out to be fake. He later disclosed the reason in an interview.

*After firing investigator, Trump meets in Oval Office with Russia, tells them the cloud is lifted. Russian media present, but US media is not.

*Trump meets with Putin, now denies knowing the Russians meddled in the election, suggests cooperating on cybersecurity. Says the country needs to move on from the election story.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this means that the Trump campaign was, in fact, colluding with the Russian government, right? Don Jr. joined this meeting thinking he could get dirt on Clinton - didn't work out that way - but both of his statements confirm that he and others joined that meeting thinking that's what they'd get from this lawyer.

First of all, we don't know that he did not get dirt on Clinton.

Second, not getting the expected goods is not a defense in all those stings against terrorists and drug dealers. So I doubt it would work here.

Yup, okay. Thank you and WTH will this insanity end? Isn't this treason? An admission of full-scale treason?

Anonymous wrote:So this means that the Trump campaign was, in fact, colluding with the Russian government, right? Don Jr. joined this meeting thinking he could get dirt on Clinton - didn't work out that way - but both of his statements confirm that he and others joined that meeting thinking that's what they'd get from this lawyer.

First of all, we don't know that he did not get dirt on Clinton.

Second, not getting the expected goods is not a defense in all those stings against terrorists and drug dealers. So I doubt it would work here.

Anonymous wrote:So this means that the Trump campaign was, in fact, colluding with the Russian government, right? Don Jr. joined this meeting thinking he could get dirt on Clinton - didn't work out that way - but both of his statements confirm that he and others joined that meeting thinking that's what they'd get from this lawyer.

The only evidence that it "didn't work out that way" is Uday's word for it. If it had worked out, I doubt he would tell us. In my opinion, whether or not it worked out that way remains to be seen.

So this means that the Trump campaign was, in fact, colluding with the Russian government, right? Don Jr. joined this meeting thinking he could get dirt on Clinton - didn't work out that way - but both of his statements confirm that he and others joined that meeting thinking that's what they'd get from this lawyer.

Anonymous wrote:

Or option 4 - the GOP doesn't care and everyone carries on.

Not possible. We are fully into the territory of illegal activity, so the FBI would be obligated to act regardless of what Trump or the GOP wanted.

It now involves Trump's own son, so Trump can't make him fall on his sword. And it involves Manafort, so they can't claim ignorance. The remaining defenses are the kind you would use in court. Very bad.