Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ah look, the anti-elites have shown up with their "$300K in debt" talking point. So stale.
Elites have the best financial aid and no loan policies. Please stop spewing your insecure ignorance.
I'm a nurse practitioner with 25+ years of experience in the field, I've worked with, hired, and trained nurses who graduated from schools ranging from University of Pennsylvania to nurses who have AA degrees from trade schools, and I can say with confidence that unless money is not really a barrier (i.e. no major sacrifices like putting off retirement or taking out a second mortgage) or you get significant financial aid, it is NOT, under any circumstances, worth it to spend upwards of $250K for a nursing degree from the University of Pennsylvania.
And that makes me stale, insecure, and ignorant? Whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't go to an Ivy. I went to state school, and BU for law school. I'm a partner in a law firm. The partner in the office next to me went to Harvard and Duke. Yet we both wound up at the same place at the same age. Tell me again about how it matters?
You must have better critical reasoning skills to be a successful attorney. On the whole, alumni of elite schools have more prestigious and lucrative careers than alumni of less prestigious schools. There are exceptions to every general trend.
Well, yes. But that doesn't mean it's the school that did that.
The research is very clear that students who get into elite schools but don't attend do just as well as those who DO attend. Which, again, shows that it's not really the school, it's the students themselves.
+1
This.
Graduates of elite colleges DO make more money over time than their counterparts at less elite schools. By itself, this statistic would lead you to believe that it was the college that gave them the earnings boost. But if you control for the colleges students apply to and were accepted to, the differences in compensation disappear. For example, a student who attends Penn State, but who also had applied and been accepted to the more prestigious University of Pennsylvania earns as much over time, on average, as a student who attended U Penn.
Yep.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ah look, the anti-elites have shown up with their "$300K in debt" talking point. So stale.
Elites have the best financial aid and no loan policies. Please stop spewing your insecure ignorance.
What a weird comment. I got into Chicago and chose to go to Illinois. It was absolutely a purely financial decision and one I do not regret. I don't speak from a place of ignorance, but from one of having actually been there and done that. If you can afford it, go ahead and go to an elite. I could not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to a state university for undergrad and an elite school for my PhD.
My take is the graduates of the state school are every bit as good as those who graduate from the elite school.
There's no way you really believe this.
Anonymous wrote:Ah look, the anti-elites have shown up with their "$300K in debt" talking point. So stale.
Elites have the best financial aid and no loan policies. Please stop spewing your insecure ignorance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't go to an Ivy. I went to state school, and BU for law school. I'm a partner in a law firm. The partner in the office next to me went to Harvard and Duke. Yet we both wound up at the same place at the same age. Tell me again about how it matters?
You must have better critical reasoning skills to be a successful attorney. On the whole, alumni of elite schools have more prestigious and lucrative careers than alumni of less prestigious schools. There are exceptions to every general trend.
Well, yes. But that doesn't mean it's the school that did that.
The research is very clear that students who get into elite schools but don't attend do just as well as those who DO attend. Which, again, shows that it's not really the school, it's the students themselves.
+1
This.
Graduates of elite colleges DO make more money over time than their counterparts at less elite schools. By itself, this statistic would lead you to believe that it was the college that gave them the earnings boost. But if you control for the colleges students apply to and were accepted to, the differences in compensation disappear. For example, a student who attends Penn State, but who also had applied and been accepted to the more prestigious University of Pennsylvania earns as much over time, on average, as a student who attended U Penn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I dunno. I wish I hadn't taken out so much money in loans to go to Ivy. Ten years later and I have a menial job that I dislike.
Hah like me I was a working class striver who went to an ivy. Without the network and family connections, career wise an ivy degree isn't worth THAT much. It will help for applying to jobs, but won't get you into the masters of the universe club -- you have to born into that.
Anonymous wrote:Ah look, the anti-elites have shown up with their "$300K in debt" talking point. So stale.
Elites have the best financial aid and no loan policies. Please stop spewing your insecure ignorance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Graduates of elite colleges DO make more money over time than their counterparts at less elite schools. By itself, this statistic would lead you to believe that it was the college that gave them the earnings boost. But if you control for the colleges students apply to and were accepted to, the differences in compensation disappear. For example, a student who attends Penn State, but who also had applied and been accepted to the more prestigious University of Pennsylvania earns as much over time, on average, as a student who attended U Penn.
Nobody that gets into Penn ends up at Penn State. These absurd hypotheticals you anti-elite folks try to pitch are absurd.![]()
Not Penn State, but my sister got into U of Penn and ended up going to one of our state colleges because she wanted to be a nurse and my parents said no way they would pay for a Penn degree for a nursing career. She's done very well, ultimately got a masters in nursing and is now managing all training for the nursing staff for a large hospital while also teaching a nursing program. U of Penn would have given her a lot of debt but likely not impacted her career. Going to the affordable in-state college was a good choice.
I have an intern right now who turned down Yale to go to U. of Alabama for free. He's great and I'm sure will have a great career.
There are a lot of reasons people would choose a public university over an Ivy but for the most part it will come down to the cost.
Too bad about your sister! University of Pennsylvania has the #1 nursing program in the country! I think it well could have impacted her career - you can't know one way or the other.
Hey - congrats - you were trying to sound like an asshole and you succeeded. Way to go schmuck...