Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My mother was 71 when she was diagnosed with a detestable combination of dementia and ALS. She was so healthy otherwise, but she quickly could not be left alone because of the dementia--and the ALS started affecting her ability to eat.
It was a *huge* battle with my father (understandably so), but I knew she would not want to live for years and years in increasingly worse versions of this, and her health care POA said "no extreme measures," and so we finally prevailed upon dad to not agree to a feeding tube.
She died 18 months after diagnosis, not long after she completely lost the ability to swallow. If she had had the feeding tube inserted, I am convinced she would have lived another 10 years, needing 24/7 care.
It's probably as close to legal assisted suicide as one can come, but I have absolutely no regrets over that decision. Her death was devastating, but if her illness had continued for years, it would have destroyed everyone in my family.
as a nurse, I often see patients' whose families decide to do the feeding tube...patients who have little to zero quality of life. It's sad
Anonymous wrote:My mother was 71 when she was diagnosed with a detestable combination of dementia and ALS. She was so healthy otherwise, but she quickly could not be left alone because of the dementia--and the ALS started affecting her ability to eat.
It was a *huge* battle with my father (understandably so), but I knew she would not want to live for years and years in increasingly worse versions of this, and her health care POA said "no extreme measures," and so we finally prevailed upon dad to not agree to a feeding tube.
She died 18 months after diagnosis, not long after she completely lost the ability to swallow. If she had had the feeding tube inserted, I am convinced she would have lived another 10 years, needing 24/7 care.
It's probably as close to legal assisted suicide as one can come, but I have absolutely no regrets over that decision. Her death was devastating, but if her illness had continued for years, it would have destroyed everyone in my family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The amount of support required by the aging is immense even if you have all the money in the world. Of course you could just let your parents fend for themselves and check in when convenient but most families do not work like this.
This might be getting off topic, but what do people without kids do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The amount of support required by the aging is immense even if you have all the money in the world. Of course you could just let your parents fend for themselves and check in when convenient but most families do not work like this.
This might be getting off topic, but what do people without kids do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My parents were dead by time last kid was born. If you don't get married young not an issue. My buddy got married at 50 to a 40 year old and had two kids one at 52 and one at 54. He won't be juggling kids and old Parents.
He still could be. People are living longer and longer these days.
But his kids will be juggling old parents in college.
Anonymous wrote:The amount of support required by the aging is immense even if you have all the money in the world. Of course you could just let your parents fend for themselves and check in when convenient but most families do not work like this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My parents were dead by time last kid was born. If you don't get married young not an issue. My buddy got married at 50 to a 40 year old and had two kids one at 52 and one at 54. He won't be juggling kids and old Parents.
He still could be. People are living longer and longer these days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And because of this, you all are planning for your own long term care arrangements, correct? So that you have a plan, and some finances, dedicated to your care as you age. My mom has done this already and I am already so grateful she's had the foresight to plan for her aging.
Well...it depends on what you think is the perfect solution. Should dh and I wait for our kids to both be off at college and then move into a continuing care facility at the age 0f 55+ - ya never know when we'll start to go down hill, right?
How do you plan for this?
I don't think you need to move yourselves anywhere. But you do need to be OPEN to the idea. You need to be setting you finances to account for this. If you want to age in place (in your home) you need to be looking at what home health aides cost. You need to be OPEN to having and using nurses etc to help you age in place, so that it's not all on your children's shoulders to figure out for you. Sure, they can help with some of this, but as this thread proves, the sandwiched generation gets pulled in two directions almost to their breaking point. You have time now to plan for your care as you age. Figure out what makes sense for your income bracket. Make the plans and tell your children about these plans are you get older.
There is nothing stopping you from finding a retirement community or nursing home you like, and saying "when the time comes, we'll go here". That way there is a plan. I think a lot of the stress surrounding these situations is older couples just think they can live at home forever without any help. But then they keep needing more and more and more help from their children.