Anonymous wrote:PP from the last post here.
Also don't even get me started on the shitty advice we received from the lactation consultants that caused my newborn to lose 9% of his birth weight by the time we left the hospital. We later found out that he wasn't able to latch on well and was receiving basically no breast milk from me. I feel very lucky the pediatrician caught this problem before we left the hospital and we did not continue to starve the baby. I swear people scoff at fed is best but lactation consultants are only interested in breastfeeding, they could get a shit about the health of the mother OR the baby, their sole goal seems to be to get everyone to breastfeed at the expense of everything else.
Anonymous wrote:There was that horrible case in Texas a few years ago where a woman contracted a staph infection and the hospital kept dismissing the husband's calls about her fever until it was almost too late. She lived but ended up with all four limbs amputated.
Anonymous wrote:There was that horrible case in Texas a few years ago where a woman contracted a staph infection and the hospital kept dismissing the husband's calls about her fever until it was almost too late. She lived but ended up with all four limbs amputated.
Anonymous wrote:Didn't read the entire thread. But my guess is, we have far more "at risk" pregnancies in this country than countries with socialized medicine have.
If you have a higher number of AMA, women with chronic health conditions, pregnancy complications, you will also have a higher rate of maternal death. In other words, don't think that the other countries are doing so great - you can't fail if you don't even try...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, it's not a focus on infants that's the problem. It's our terrible healthcare system.
I'm not so sure. They put a ton of resources into promoting breastfeeding, which has negligible if any benefits. The protocols developed by Canada to prevent pre-eclampsia wouldn't take that much money; just the organization/political will to do it.
I disagree that there are a ton of resources promoting breastfeeding. I'm a new mom struggling with breastfeeding and I'm struggling to get support. The hospital provided minimal service (and before my milk even came in with no follow up) and LCs are expensive. I went to a support group at the hospital but there were too many people there to get any specific guidance. Also, it's really tough to continue breastfeeding with a lack of paid maternity leave. Now Congress wants to get rid of the ACA mandates related to breastfeeding.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe it's not the focus on newborns that's causing maternal deaths. Hell, the hospitals routinely miss things like tongue-ties and low blood sugar in newborns, and at some hospitals they won't take jaundiced babies to the NICU instead making the parents hold them on a warming blanket like we're in some third world country, plus even the "baby friendly" hospitals never seem to have enough qualified and competent lactation consultants. I almost hate to suggest this because I know how sensitive people get but I wonder if the maternal deaths from conditions like HELLP which are serious but treatable if caught early, are more the result of the more focus on "natural childbirth," not necessarily epidural-free labors but more the attitude of hospitals that the vast majority of births are perfectly fine and complication-free so why not leave women alone more after birth and not treat it as a serious medical event. The natural childbirth movement picked up a lot of steam in the 90s and into the 2000s and they didn't like the continuous monitoring, women being confined to the hospital bed during labor kind of stuff, and the longer hospital stays after birth, but without that, you do lose a lot of monitoring potential to catch some of these serious issues that can come up in the few days after birth.