Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And what's up with South County doing so poorly?
What was it previously? All schools have fluky off years.
6 isn't horrible. They can come back from that.
Six isn't objectively bad but South County has fewer FARMS kids than Marshall does. They should be doing much better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Wish I could say I've figured this out. I want my kids' exposed to economic and cultural diversity, and maybe even a little (monitored) hardship (like being a linguistic minority) but Goddamn if I want them to receive anything but the best education.
This. This. And more this. And I imagine most of the "liberal elite" feel this way. But what's the alternative? To be fine raising your kids in a rich white bubble? Or to be fine with your kids getting a bad education? Like PP, I want to a majority-minority high school with a > 50% FARMS rate. And I do want better educational and extra curricular opportunities for my kids. So, I get that this attitude I'd off putting. But, not sure what the alternative is.
But is it truly accurate to say the lower-rated GS schools in FCPS provide a bad education? I'm not convinced. Not all high-FARMS, majority-minority schools are created equal.
This is how I feel. Maybe there is an order of performance among the " bad" schools, but I have to believe they have plenty to offer.
This is florida - where schools largely suck, or Compton.
These scores are driving people away from these schools and doing so much harm. Yes, we need info, but this system is terrible for our area and the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Wish I could say I've figured this out. I want my kids' exposed to economic and cultural diversity, and maybe even a little (monitored) hardship (like being a linguistic minority) but Goddamn if I want them to receive anything but the best education.
This. This. And more this. And I imagine most of the "liberal elite" feel this way. But what's the alternative? To be fine raising your kids in a rich white bubble? Or to be fine with your kids getting a bad education? Like PP, I want to a majority-minority high school with a > 50% FARMS rate. And I do want better educational and extra curricular opportunities for my kids. So, I get that this attitude I'd off putting. But, not sure what the alternative is.
But is it truly accurate to say the lower-rated GS schools in FCPS provide a bad education? I'm not convinced. Not all high-FARMS, majority-minority schools are created equal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Wish I could say I've figured this out. I want my kids' exposed to economic and cultural diversity, and maybe even a little (monitored) hardship (like being a linguistic minority) but Goddamn if I want them to receive anything but the best education.
This. This. And more this. And I imagine most of the "liberal elite" feel this way. But what's the alternative? To be fine raising your kids in a rich white bubble? Or to be fine with your kids getting a bad education? Like PP, I want to a majority-minority high school with a > 50% FARMS rate. And I do want better educational and extra curricular opportunities for my kids. So, I get that this attitude I'd off putting. But, not sure what the alternative is.
But is it truly accurate to say the lower-rated GS schools in FCPS provide a bad education? I'm not convinced. Not all high-FARMS, majority-minority schools are created equal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Wish I could say I've figured this out. I want my kids' exposed to economic and cultural diversity, and maybe even a little (monitored) hardship (like being a linguistic minority) but Goddamn if I want them to receive anything but the best education.
This. This. And more this. And I imagine most of the "liberal elite" feel this way. But what's the alternative? To be fine raising your kids in a rich white bubble? Or to be fine with your kids getting a bad education? Like PP, I want to a majority-minority high school with a > 50% FARMS rate. And I do want better educational and extra curricular opportunities for my kids. So, I get that this attitude I'd off putting. But, not sure what the alternative is.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Wish I could say I've figured this out. I want my kids' exposed to economic and cultural diversity, and maybe even a little (monitored) hardship (like being a linguistic minority) but Goddamn if I want them to receive anything but the best education.
This. This. And more this. And I imagine most of the "liberal elite" feel this way. But what's the alternative? To be fine raising your kids in a rich white bubble? Or to be fine with your kids getting a bad education? Like PP, I want to a majority-minority high school with a > 50% FARMS rate. And I do want better educational and extra curricular opportunities for my kids. So, I get that this attitude I'd off putting. But, not sure what the alternative is.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
If your neighbors are smart you will have a high gs rating. We lived in a 7 zone and many of the neighbors cleaned houses, mowed lawns and were blue collar. Now in my gs 9 neighborhood it's all white collars. Always ackward trying to drum up small talk with the guy who worked on your house.
I went to a high school in south Florida that was about 95% Latino and about 50% ESOL (house was in a blue collar, low SES neighborhood). I'm American but had to learn Spanish in order to get by socially. I parlayed that cultural/linguistic capital into a graduate degree from Georgetown and am now struggling with the idea of leaving my white, high SES kiddos in the Stuart pyramid. I feel pretty damn lucky to be able to talk to my lawn guy in his native language, and know that coming up in that environment made me a smarter, more culturally literate and tolerant human being. BUT it's almost impossible for me to look at those annoying GS numbers on RedFin as I'm considering what neighborhood to move to.
Wish I could say I've figured this out. I want my kids' exposed to economic and cultural diversity, and maybe even a little (monitored) hardship (like being a linguistic minority) but Goddamn if I want them to receive anything but the best education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And what's up with South County doing so poorly?
What was it previously? All schools have fluky off years.
6 isn't horrible. They can come back from that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your neighbors are smart you will have a high gs rating. We lived in a 7 zone and many of the neighbors cleaned houses, mowed lawns and were blue collar. Now in my gs 9 neighborhood it's all white collars. Always ackward trying to drum up small talk with the guy who worked on your house.
You have to be a troll or so stuck up your own arse that you don't realize how ridiculous this sounds.
Anonymous wrote:
If your neighbors are smart you will have a high gs rating. We lived in a 7 zone and many of the neighbors cleaned houses, mowed lawns and were blue collar. Now in my gs 9 neighborhood it's all white collars. Always ackward trying to drum up small talk with the guy who worked on your house.
Anonymous wrote:If your neighbors are smart you will have a high gs rating. We lived in a 7 zone and many of the neighbors cleaned houses, mowed lawns and were blue collar. Now in my gs 9 neighborhood it's all white collars. Always ackward trying to drum up small talk with the guy who worked on your house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And what's up with South County doing so poorly?
What was it previously? All schools have fluky off years.
6 isn't horrible. They can come back from that.
Anonymous wrote:And what's up with South County doing so poorly?