Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So interesting to me how people on this thread are so easily willing to call OP "selfish" for wanting to invest in herself, when that is exactly what the OP's DH did for 15 years - taking the family money and time and investing it solely in himself.
Also interesting to me is that many in thread want OP to be able to ensure an ROI in a way that isn't clear was applied to the DH. And, if one really wants to talk about being obligated to act in the best interests of the family, well than DH's insistence that the family spend 15 years investing iin him only is not the wisest financial play. Better would to invest to maximize both parents in the workplace. This also spreads risk and strengthens family to be resilient financially in case of unexpected problems.
Really a lot of sexism in this thread.
No. Instead most posters are probably not judging the husband because he earned a degree that is required for his job and still has this job. op doesn't have a concrete plan for starting a business and has admitted she doesn't really like working. There's a huge difference.
I think you're kind of sexist for assuming the other posters are being sexist. Get it?
No. Most people are thinking his 1st wife (OP) supported him to get him where he is now and there is a huge risk he could take those skills with him in a divorce and he owes it to his wife to let her build her resume up in the same way so she can be successful in her own right. He also is holding her back to limit her possibilities in case she decided to divorce.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So interesting to me how people on this thread are so easily willing to call OP "selfish" for wanting to invest in herself, when that is exactly what the OP's DH did for 15 years - taking the family money and time and investing it solely in himself.
Also interesting to me is that many in thread want OP to be able to ensure an ROI in a way that isn't clear was applied to the DH. And, if one really wants to talk about being obligated to act in the best interests of the family, well than DH's insistence that the family spend 15 years investing iin him only is not the wisest financial play. Better would to invest to maximize both parents in the workplace. This also spreads risk and strengthens family to be resilient financially in case of unexpected problems.
Really a lot of sexism in this thread.
No. Instead most posters are probably not judging the husband because he earned a degree that is required for his job and still has this job. op doesn't have a concrete plan for starting a business and has admitted she doesn't really like working. There's a huge difference.
I think you're kind of sexist for assuming the other posters are being sexist. Get it?
No. Most people are thinking his 1st wife (OP) supported him to get him where he is now and there is a huge risk he could take those skills with him in a divorce and he owes it to his wife to let her build her resume up in the same way so she can be successful in her own right. He also is holding her back to limit her possibilities in case she decided to divorce.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So interesting to me how people on this thread are so easily willing to call OP "selfish" for wanting to invest in herself, when that is exactly what the OP's DH did for 15 years - taking the family money and time and investing it solely in himself.
Also interesting to me is that many in thread want OP to be able to ensure an ROI in a way that isn't clear was applied to the DH. And, if one really wants to talk about being obligated to act in the best interests of the family, well than DH's insistence that the family spend 15 years investing iin him only is not the wisest financial play. Better would to invest to maximize both parents in the workplace. This also spreads risk and strengthens family to be resilient financially in case of unexpected problems.
Really a lot of sexism in this thread.
No. Instead most posters are probably not judging the husband because he earned a degree that is required for his job and still has this job. op doesn't have a concrete plan for starting a business and has admitted she doesn't really like working. There's a huge difference.
I think you're kind of sexist for assuming the other posters are being sexist. Get it?
Anonymous wrote:So interesting to me how people on this thread are so easily willing to call OP "selfish" for wanting to invest in herself, when that is exactly what the OP's DH did for 15 years - taking the family money and time and investing it solely in himself.
Also interesting to me is that many in thread want OP to be able to ensure an ROI in a way that isn't clear was applied to the DH. And, if one really wants to talk about being obligated to act in the best interests of the family, well than DH's insistence that the family spend 15 years investing iin him only is not the wisest financial play. Better would to invest to maximize both parents in the workplace. This also spreads risk and strengthens family to be resilient financially in case of unexpected problems.
Really a lot of sexism in this thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you need to empower yourself and take the classes you want to take. Your husband will just have to suck it up. If something were to happen to him and he died or couldn't work or he leaves you, you will need the means and ability to support yourself and the kids.
Do not allow him to determine your future and take away your power as a person. You are still a person and capable of making decisions for yourself. Take the classes, and let your husband figure out how to cope. Your entire family will benefit from you furthering your education. Your husband is a moron if he doesn't see that.
This is highly debatable. If OP doesn't need the degree and is getting it for simply the sake of education and the experience then it most likely won't help her family. They will be using money that could be used to instead save for college for her children or pay down their mortgage. Or invest for retirement. Going back to school could actually HURT her family. She's MARRIED with children and is no longer in the position to make her own decision in isolation. Her husband most likely pursued his education when he was younger and before children. They are in a different place now and there are other factors to consider.
It's extremely selfish to go and spend a lot of money on an unnecessary degree that results in less time with her children and spending money that could be saved for college.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you need to empower yourself and take the classes you want to take. Your husband will just have to suck it up. If something were to happen to him and he died or couldn't work or he leaves you, you will need the means and ability to support yourself and the kids.
Do not allow him to determine your future and take away your power as a person. You are still a person and capable of making decisions for yourself. Take the classes, and let your husband figure out how to cope. Your entire family will benefit from you furthering your education. Your husband is a moron if he doesn't see that.
Anonymous wrote:Op here and wow, overwhelmed by all the thoughtful responses here. After writing it out, thinking it through, and hearing the perspectives here, I am leaning toward the belief that DH is just both thinking practically, perhaps somewhat selfishly, and just really intellectually against the idea of throwing any more money at post undergrad education. Not trying to keep me down. He's read philosophy books that are anti-education. He even suggested an apprenticeship instead. He's not controlling. On the contrary, he wants me to go back to work once the kids are older, because he has been feeling the pressure of being the sole income earner the past year.
For me, this education thing has been a sore spot in our relationship-because he's always discouraged it for me. Meanwhile I've always valued education, and beyond practical applications, viewed it as something I can do for me. The social interaction, intellectual challenge, and confidence that comes from learning.
I want DH's support because it will require some commitment from him as well. I can't just take classes when I'm taking care of little ones without some support. It's an investment of time and money for our whole family.
He knows I can run a business, I ran a sole proprietorship for well over a decade. I enjoyed it and flourished in the beginning. But the last few years were a grind for me, especially after kids. I know how to write a business plan.
I haven't just started moving forward on things because right now I have my hands full with the kids. But once my youngest starts preschool in the fall, that will free up some time for me to pursue my path. I'm just thinking ahead on what I want to do after that.
Pp's have been extremely helpful, esp in regard to options that are open for me. I'm not looking for a degree. I have looked into free and paid online courses. I will likely do some in the fall once my youngest is in preschool. I've taken some online courses in the past, as well as classroom courses. I just learn better in the classroom and enjoy them much more. Online courses are so isolating, and just requires a lot more constant self-motivation to get through. And I've come to hate spending so much time in front of a screen. I would definitely prefer taking courses in the classroom, but may still opt for online for practical reasons.
Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it. Oh and to clarify, DH only changed course on his career path once. And he only had debt from his undergrad and professional degrees. Graduate degree was full scholarship. But still a lot. And I would not consider our HHI low, but yes, we have the school debt and a mortgage and a couple college funds to start growing.
Anonymous wrote:Not going to quote the whole husband is abusive post but I got that also. It's cheaper to have wife stay home and raise his kids than her work.