Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reasons you count twins as one is not because of "the biological connection" but because of the logistics, even at the secondary level.
There's a reason APS can't figure things out logically, and it appears to be the board.
That argument holds water at the elementary level, where parents have to be much more involved in getting kids dressed, fed, etc & ensuring a safe trip to the bus stop or school. You'll have a hard time convincing me there's serious "logistics" issues with a couple 15-year olds going to different schools. Especially in a county as small as Arlington, where the next high school isn't more than 5 miles away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tonight's Work Session is covering the 1,300 seats at the HS level and the enrollment and transfer policy. One of the changes the APS staff is proposing is to eliminate the twin-as-one policy at the secondary level, i.e. at HB Woodlawn. The new policy would require each twin to enter the lottery and get in or not as an individual.
Nancy freaked out, essentially yelling at the staff that she "find[s] it offensive that people are willing to discriminate against the biological connection between twins. It can be very detrimental to separate them. I am really offended by that! It's a very special and psychological position they are in." She told them they couldn't "forcibly separate families." Never occurred to her that gee, maybe if the kids don't want to be separated then maybe they should just go to their neighborhood HS. She basically tried to force a Board vote on the issue. Tannia agreed with her, Reid didn't. Barbara said she didn't have a position, and James was silent. Major bitch mode.
Tell me again when she's up for re-election?
If my Irish twins (18 months) have to apply separately--so should all biological twins.
Do colleges admit biological twins as one? No. Even frickin' travel sport teams don't consider them one.
Anonymous wrote:Tonight's Work Session is covering the 1,300 seats at the HS level and the enrollment and transfer policy. One of the changes the APS staff is proposing is to eliminate the twin-as-one policy at the secondary level, i.e. at HB Woodlawn. The new policy would require each twin to enter the lottery and get in or not as an individual.
Nancy freaked out, essentially yelling at the staff that she "find[s] it offensive that people are willing to discriminate against the biological connection between twins. It can be very detrimental to separate them. I am really offended by that! It's a very special and psychological position they are in." She told them they couldn't "forcibly separate families." Never occurred to her that gee, maybe if the kids don't want to be separated then maybe they should just go to their neighborhood HS. She basically tried to force a Board vote on the issue. Tannia agreed with her, Reid didn't. Barbara said she didn't have a position, and James was silent. Major bitch mode.
Tell me again when she's up for re-election?
Anonymous wrote:
PS In addition to the bullshittery of secondary school students needing to be together, what's with the claim that twins have these needs that are mysterious to those not in the know? Don't all of us know at least one set of multiples?
Anonymous wrote:
I don't disagree with you, but I also think this is just so NOT IMPORTANT. Have a twin policy or don't, whatever. Just as long as it doesn't deprive someone else of a seat, or mean they are advantaged in the lottery, which is I think what Goldstein was pressing on. This is not worth even 2 minutes of conversation. Van Doren got what she wanted and then wasted additional time throwing a tantrum. Not just time wasting but completely unprofessional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reasons you count twins as one is not because of "the biological connection" but because of the logistics, even at the secondary level.
There's a reason APS can't figure things out logically, and it appears to be the board.
That argument holds water at the elementary level, where parents have to be much more involved in getting kids dressed, fed, etc & ensuring a safe trip to the bus stop or school. You'll have a hard time convincing me there's serious "logistics" issues with a couple 15-year olds going to different schools. Especially in a county as small as Arlington, where the next high school isn't more than 5 miles away.
Anonymous wrote:Whoa! Just watched the clip. Honestly, the comments on here don't do it justice. Holy cow- you have to watch it! She really comes across as mentally unstable. I think she also needs to educate herself on what it means to "discriminate"-- last time I checked, "twin-ness" isn't a protected class.
Anonymous wrote:This is a classic example of government at its worst. A member of the school board supports a policy because it affects her personally, instead of thinking of the county at large. I hope no kids were watching that because that's how it's supposed to be done.
Anonymous wrote:This is a classic example of government at its worst. A member of the school board supports a policy because it affects her personally, instead of thinking of the county at large. I hope no kids were watching that because that's how it's supposed to be done.
Anonymous wrote:The reasons you count twins as one is not because of "the biological connection" but because of the logistics, even at the secondary level.
There's a reason APS can't figure things out logically, and it appears to be the board.