Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - did she refer to him as a sugar daddy or did you pin that title on her? The fact that she admitted having a FW$B means she that she wants to be open with you early in the relationship. When I was single I lived with a non-BF (ten years older) for a few months because I had just started my career and couldn't yet afford my own place. We never "negotiated" sex as part of the deal but we were both single, consenting adults who enjoyed sex. I never paid him any rent and he paid for most of the groceries. Was he a sugar daddy? Technically he was "an older gentleman who helped me out financially with whom I slept with" so he might fit the definition. I never viewed him as a "sugar daddy" and I'm sure there are tons of other women who've had similar relationships. I met my DH five years later and never told him about this guy because I never went onto detail about the half dozen other guys I had relationships with before I met DH.

So, you were a whore, and you're afraid to tell your husband so you classify it differently. You were still a whore.

I don't know why women always have to shit on each other. You're very ugly inside. I pity you.

Why? I was never a whore. I don't support "the sisterhood" when they make stupid decisions.

Because you're clearly a huge bitch.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - did she refer to him as a sugar daddy or did you pin that title on her? The fact that she admitted having a FW$B means she that she wants to be open with you early in the relationship. When I was single I lived with a non-BF (ten years older) for a few months because I had just started my career and couldn't yet afford my own place. We never "negotiated" sex as part of the deal but we were both single, consenting adults who enjoyed sex. I never paid him any rent and he paid for most of the groceries. Was he a sugar daddy? Technically he was "an older gentleman who helped me out financially with whom I slept with" so he might fit the definition. I never viewed him as a "sugar daddy" and I'm sure there are tons of other women who've had similar relationships. I met my DH five years later and never told him about this guy because I never went onto detail about the half dozen other guys I had relationships with before I met DH.

So, you were a whore, and you're afraid to tell your husband so you classify it differently. You were still a whore.

I don't know why women always have to shit on each other. You're very ugly inside. I pity you.

Why? I was never a whore. I don't support "the sisterhood" when they make stupid decisions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - did she refer to him as a sugar daddy or did you pin that title on her? The fact that she admitted having a FW$B means she that she wants to be open with you early in the relationship. When I was single I lived with a non-BF (ten years older) for a few months because I had just started my career and couldn't yet afford my own place. We never "negotiated" sex as part of the deal but we were both single, consenting adults who enjoyed sex. I never paid him any rent and he paid for most of the groceries. Was he a sugar daddy? Technically he was "an older gentleman who helped me out financially with whom I slept with" so he might fit the definition. I never viewed him as a "sugar daddy" and I'm sure there are tons of other women who've had similar relationships. I met my DH five years later and never told him about this guy because I never went onto detail about the half dozen other guys I had relationships with before I met DH.

So, you were a whore, and you're afraid to tell your husband so you classify it differently. You were still a whore.

I don't know why women always have to shit on each other. You're very ugly inside. I pity you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - did she refer to him as a sugar daddy or did you pin that title on her? The fact that she admitted having a FW$B means she that she wants to be open with you early in the relationship. When I was single I lived with a non-BF (ten years older) for a few months because I had just started my career and couldn't yet afford my own place. We never "negotiated" sex as part of the deal but we were both single, consenting adults who enjoyed sex. I never paid him any rent and he paid for most of the groceries. Was he a sugar daddy? Technically he was "an older gentleman who helped me out financially with whom I slept with" so he might fit the definition. I never viewed him as a "sugar daddy" and I'm sure there are tons of other women who've had similar relationships. I met my DH five years later and never told him about this guy because I never went onto detail about the half dozen other guys I had relationships with before I met DH.

So, you were a whore, and you're afraid to tell your husband so you classify it differently. You were still a whore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My new girlfriend a couple months disclosed to me that she was a sugar daddy a couple of years ago. I was shocked as she doesn't seem the type. She is smart, educated, good values, doesn't sleep around, etc. We didn't have sex until 5 dates. I'm a little repulsed by this new information. I like her and I am even beginning to fall in love with her, but this new information has me second guessing dating her. She isn't a slut. She only had one sugar baby who helped pay for grad school. I know we all have a past, but I'm not sure this is something I can ever get past.

Be glad she doesn't have student loans you have to pay off. I wish I'd had a sugar daddy during school!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - did she refer to him as a sugar daddy or did you pin that title on her? The fact that she admitted having a FW$B means she that she wants to be open with you early in the relationship. When I was single I lived with a non-BF (ten years older) for a few months because I had just started my career and couldn't yet afford my own place. We never "negotiated" sex as part of the deal but we were both single, consenting adults who enjoyed sex. I never paid him any rent and he paid for most of the groceries. Was he a sugar daddy? Technically he was "an older gentleman who helped me out financially with whom I slept with" so he might fit the definition. I never viewed him as a "sugar daddy" and I'm sure there are tons of other women who've had similar relationships. I met my DH five years later and never told him about this guy because I never went onto detail about the half dozen other guys I had relationships with before I met DH.

So, you were a whore, and you're afraid to tell your husband so you classify it differently. You were still a whore.

Anonymous wrote:Op here. The guy was young as well ( in 30's). I know some people don't see it as prostitution but I do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do her a favor and break up with her now. She doesn't need this kind of judgment from you.

To all the women who say what happened in a woman's past is not the man's business, no matter how many notches are on her bedpost, I wonder how you would feel about your husband if you found out 10 years into marriage that your DH was a very promiscuous gigolo or porn star.

Gay or straight?

Anonymous wrote:OP - did she refer to him as a sugar daddy or did you pin that title on her? The fact that she admitted having a FW$B means she that she wants to be open with you early in the relationship. When I was single I lived with a non-BF (ten years older) for a few months because I had just started my career and couldn't yet afford my own place. We never "negotiated" sex as part of the deal but we were both single, consenting adults who enjoyed sex. I never paid him any rent and he paid for most of the groceries. Was he a sugar daddy? Technically he was "an older gentleman who helped me out financially with whom I slept with" so he might fit the definition. I never viewed him as a "sugar daddy" and I'm sure there are tons of other women who've had similar relationships. I met my DH five years later and never told him about this guy because I never went onto detail about the half dozen other guys I had relationships with before I met DH.

Anonymous wrote:OP - did she refer to him as a sugar daddy or did you pin that title on her? The fact that she admitted having a FW$B means she that she wants to be open with you early in the relationship. When I was single I lived with a non-BF (ten years older) for a few months because I had just started my career and couldn't yet afford my own place. We never "negotiated" sex as part of the deal but we were both single, consenting adults who enjoyed sex. I never paid him any rent and he paid for most of the groceries. Was he a sugar daddy? Technically he was "an older gentleman who helped me out financially with whom I slept with" so he might fit the definition. I never viewed him as a "sugar daddy" and I'm sure there are tons of other women who've had similar relationships. I met my DH five years later and never told him about this guy because I never went onto detail about the half dozen other guys I had relationships with before I met DH.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It took 5 dates to sleep with her? Bet she has a few more daddies hanging around. Get your self tested.

Not everyone spreads theirs legs on the first, second, or third date. Some women have self-respect.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do her a favor and break up with her now. She doesn't need this kind of judgment from you.

To all the women who say what happened in a woman's past is not the man's business, no matter how many notches are on her bedpost, I wonder how you would feel about your husband if you found out 10 years into marriage that your DH was a very promiscuous gigolo or porn star.

Anonymous wrote:Op here. The guy was young as well ( in 30's). I know some people don't see it as prostitution but I do.