Anonymous wrote:I don't think the love letter analogy is on point.
That's saying OP is not meeting her husband's sexual needs. Sounds like he was perfectly happy before this.
Like, "oh he writes me poetry and professes his love but I just found out he threatened to kill himself over a former girlfriend so now our healthy relationship pales in comparison to the messed up one he had before."
We don't know what their sex life has been like. We don't know what OP's DH would like to do in bed that he has just never asked for, or that he has asked for and been rejected. OP, has your husband ever asked for freaky stuff and you turned him down? Or do you think if you had offered any of it to him he would have refused it or loved it? So we don't know what degree of satisfaction DH had or might have had with their sex life.
Now he's imagining "all those guys" before that were sexy enough to make you want to do wild stuff. Or that you were so crazy in love with that you wanted to do whatever you could to please them. You did these things with them to make them happy and feel good and to like you. These don't seem to be concerns with respect to DH. You are less motivated to make him happy or feel good or to like you. Yes, you love him and want to be married forever, but that's safe and secure and he just doesn't curl your toes like the others did.
Ladies, If you found out your husband used to send flowers to his prior GFs all the time, or bought her expensive gifts because he was so madly in love with them, but he's only ever done the bare minimum of those things for you. how would that make you feel? It would feel like his other GFs meant more to him than you do.
Now multiply that by about 10, because sexual affection is the most essential element to a marriage for most men. Sex is far more powerful than just flowers or gifts. I think the love letter analogy is right on point, or very much understated.