The government has a vested interest in an educated and healthy citizenry. If you want to teach your kids yourself, be my guest. But I would like for the rest of the country to be educated.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Too many parents wouldn't make sure their kids do that. That's why the gov't gets involved. It'll cost us now or later.
Many of us really don't want the government raising our kids.
I don't think you want the govt. not raising other kids in this country though. More problems due to lack of education in our country.
Anonymous wrote:Prison costs three times the amount it costs to educate a child per year. This comparison doesn't include the money that an adult would bring into the country after being educated nor the money received by other people and industries by having a safe country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Too many parents wouldn't make sure their kids do that. That's why the gov't gets involved. It'll cost us now or later.
Many of us really don't want the government raising our kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I meant MARCHING. I know band is a class. I'm cool with that.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PE is part of the curriculum. I'm talking about EXTRAcurricular sports. And probably, band, etc., too.Anonymous wrote:I'm not a super athlete, a rock star, or Van Gough, but I would have an issue with a school that doesn't offer sports, music, or art. They are all important to the whole-child. They all add value to a child's education and for many kids, make school fun to attend. If you want to limit that number of sports offered, that's fine.
Band is a class too
Marching Band has to fund itself. It is not a budget item.
Anonymous wrote:I meant MARCHING. I know band is a class. I'm cool with that.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PE is part of the curriculum. I'm talking about EXTRAcurricular sports. And probably, band, etc., too.Anonymous wrote:I'm not a super athlete, a rock star, or Van Gough, but I would have an issue with a school that doesn't offer sports, music, or art. They are all important to the whole-child. They all add value to a child's education and for many kids, make school fun to attend. If you want to limit that number of sports offered, that's fine.
Band is a class too
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What budget crisis? The budget goes up every single year.
This. I've stopped taking their cries of woe seriously. It's a complete 'boy who cried wolf' situation.
The school board and FCPS has a problem with math. MORE money every single year is hardly a budget crisis.
Yep, my real estate assessment went up again this year.
That is because your house value increased. That is a good thing.
Anonymous wrote: Too many parents wouldn't make sure their kids do that. That's why the gov't gets involved. It'll cost us now or later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PE is part of the curriculum. I'm talking about EXTRAcurricular sports. And probably, band, etc., too.Anonymous wrote:I'm not a super athlete, a rock star, or Van Gough, but I would have an issue with a school that doesn't offer sports, music, or art. They are all important to the whole-child. They all add value to a child's education and for many kids, make school fun to attend. If you want to limit that number of sports offered, that's fine.
PE isn't academic, get rid of it. It's not within the school's core purpose.
Anonymous wrote:OP here... oh I think educating children about physical activity and health is absolutely part of the academic curriculum. Body and mind...Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PE is part of the curriculum. I'm talking about EXTRAcurricular sports. And probably, band, etc., too.Anonymous wrote:I'm not a super athlete, a rock star, or Van Gough, but I would have an issue with a school that doesn't offer sports, music, or art. They are all important to the whole-child. They all add value to a child's education and for many kids, make school fun to attend. If you want to limit that number of sports offered, that's fine.
PE isn't academic, get rid of it. It's not within the school's core purpose.
Arts can also be used to each much about other subjects - math, history, language.
Focus on the EXTRAcurriculars, people!
OP here... oh I think educating children about physical activity and health is absolutely part of the academic curriculum. Body and mind...Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PE is part of the curriculum. I'm talking about EXTRAcurricular sports. And probably, band, etc., too.Anonymous wrote:I'm not a super athlete, a rock star, or Van Gough, but I would have an issue with a school that doesn't offer sports, music, or art. They are all important to the whole-child. They all add value to a child's education and for many kids, make school fun to attend. If you want to limit that number of sports offered, that's fine.
PE isn't academic, get rid of it. It's not within the school's core purpose.
I meant MARCHING. I know band is a class. I'm cool with that.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PE is part of the curriculum. I'm talking about EXTRAcurricular sports. And probably, band, etc., too.Anonymous wrote:I'm not a super athlete, a rock star, or Van Gough, but I would have an issue with a school that doesn't offer sports, music, or art. They are all important to the whole-child. They all add value to a child's education and for many kids, make school fun to attend. If you want to limit that number of sports offered, that's fine.
Band is a class too