Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The brother of one of my DH's closest friends growing up was born between 20 and 21 weeks gestation and weighed only 15 oz. This was about 40 years ago too. He is a lawyer who went to Ivy League with absolutely no issues from his birth.
I'd say the technology is a lot better now than it was back then. She stands a chance of a good outcome.
This didn't happen.
Dude, I don't know what to tell you. But it happened. His mom was a practicing physician at the time so maybe she had access to specialized care? But my DH was there, sorry.
This absolutely did not happen. This has never happened. You should speak with a neonatologist to confirm. Because this never happened.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The brother of one of my DH's closest friends growing up was born between 20 and 21 weeks gestation and weighed only 15 oz. This was about 40 years ago too. He is a lawyer who went to Ivy League with absolutely no issues from his birth.
I'd say the technology is a lot better now than it was back then. She stands a chance of a good outcome.
This didn't happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The brother of one of my DH's closest friends growing up was born between 20 and 21 weeks gestation and weighed only 15 oz. This was about 40 years ago too. He is a lawyer who went to Ivy League with absolutely no issues from his birth.
I'd say the technology is a lot better now than it was back then. She stands a chance of a good outcome.
This didn't happen.
Dude, I don't know what to tell you. But it happened. His mom was a practicing physician at the time so maybe she had access to specialized care? But my DH was there, sorry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The brother of one of my DH's closest friends growing up was born between 20 and 21 weeks gestation and weighed only 15 oz. This was about 40 years ago too. He is a lawyer who went to Ivy League with absolutely no issues from his birth.
I'd say the technology is a lot better now than it was back then. She stands a chance of a good outcome.
This didn't happen.
Anonymous wrote:The brother of one of my DH's closest friends growing up was born between 20 and 21 weeks gestation and weighed only 15 oz. This was about 40 years ago too. He is a lawyer who went to Ivy League with absolutely no issues from his birth.
I'd say the technology is a lot better now than it was back then. She stands a chance of a good outcome.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.today.com/parents/cleveland-cavaliers-star-j-r-smith-holds-preemie-baby-t107903?cid=sm_fb_klg
Baby was 5 months early and 1 lb for all you doubters....
Anonymous wrote:She had the baby at the end of December, but it was due at the beginning of May. December to May looks like a 5 month span on paper but it's really only about 4 months.
The baby was probably at 23-24 weeks. A 1-pound baby is a micro-preemie for sure. The best of luck and health to them.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.tmz.com/2017/01/10/j-r-smith-daughter-21-weeker/
Interesting article about early preterm babies. Interestingly, black girls have the best chance for survival: http://healthland.time.com/2011/05/27/baby-born-at-21-weeks-survives-how-young-is-too-young-to-save/
Birthweight is apparently a huge factor, and if the baby weighs a pound, as the parents reported, that's substantial.
Anonymous wrote:The newest articles say the baby was born between 21 and 22 weeks. As a mother of preemie twins, I can tell you that the hospital staff sometimes tells you to "round down." Mine were born at 33 weeks and 6.5 days but told that the staff would treat them as 33 weeks in deciding which tests to run, etc. (I was trying so hard to make it until midnight,). If that is true here, someone would think 40 - 21 = 19 weeks early, closer to 5 months than 4 months.
That poor child, and what a horrible thing for the parents.