Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Detailed CNN story on Keith Ellison, and his not so distant past.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/01/politics/kfile-keith-ellison-nation-of-islam/index.html

I heard NPR interview him yesterday morning.

The NPR host was literally laughing in disbelief at Keith Elison's non-answers and evasiveness. Ellison also has an undeniable past with extremist bigot Farakhan, and that past isn't going away; Keith even bragged about the million man march being one of the best things he's done - even though that even is inextricably linked with Farakhan's nation of islam.

Elison would be a terrible choice for the job.

Anonymous wrote:Detailed CNN story on Keith Ellison, and his not so distant past.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/01/politics/kfile-keith-ellison-nation-of-islam/index.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm on board for Ellison... although some are pointing out his more establishment links, which I don't love (the Soros son, etc.)

no - please push back on Keith - this is not a part-time job.


and #2 - anyone that schumer endorses needs to be extra vetted. We know who his handlers are.

Anonymous wrote:Detailed CNN story on Keith Ellison, and his not so distant past.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/01/politics/kfile-keith-ellison-nation-of-islam/index.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Julian Castro

Desiree Brown

Bernie

At nearly 80, and with an active Senate seat. Seriously? Besides, he has already signaled Keith Ellison as his proxy. Would take a much-needed voice out of congress.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Julian Castro

Desiree Brown

Bernie

Anonymous wrote:Julian Castro

Desiree Brown

Anonymous wrote:I hear Harry Reid will be available, come January.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, if you are going to win the midwestern electoral votes, you will need to find someone who can work with them.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/the-election-came-down-to-107330-votes-in-pennsylvania-wisconsin-and-michigan/article/2005323

But in 2012, black voters made up 13 percent of the electorate; in 2016, they comprised just 10 percent of the electorate.

In terms of raw votes, that means roughly 130,000 fewer African-Americans voted in Pennsylvania in 2016 than voted in 2012. If those voters had shown up on Tuesday, that alone would've been enough for Clinton to hold Pennsylvania by a razor-thin margin.

Michigan and PA flip if black turnout was same as 2012.

if same as 2008, pa, michigan, and wisc all stay blue.

two things - 2020 nominee cannot be a non-black. and neither can dnc chair.

Stop blaming black voters, blame HRC and the DNC. In 2008 Obama got 3,276,363 votes in PA. HRC only got 2,841,280. That's over 400,00 voters who didn't like Hillary. It doesn't have anything to do with the fact she is a white, women. She wasn't an exciting, charismatic candidate that people wanted to support.

black people have more natural swag.

who do you think will make it through a dem primary (which runs through the south) - booker or warren?

I want to create the optimal conditions to maximize black turnout. and that means having a candidate they can connect with.

Black person here. Pray tell, what is this "natural swag" you speak of?

Anyone?

Anonymous wrote:they need keith