Anonymous wrote:We live in NW DC and make $250K-400K as do all of our friends and neighbors. We're all 2 income families in well-paying but not elite-paying DC area jobs (no law partners or senior lobbyists--we're mostly two fed households). We own expensive, old, small houses and pay way too much for childcare, etc. Otherwise we live pretty simple day-to-day lives: public school, Old Navy, etc You know the story. Some of our neighborhood friends' kids are starting to graduate from Wilson and I'm noticing a trend. They get into very good colleges (top 50) but these schools are full freight. Most end up going to second or third tier schools (public or private) that offer aid.
Is this pretty much how it goes for people like us? (i.e. high income earners regardless of our daily housing/etc expenses). I can think of about a dozen NW DC kids who got into schools like Smith or Swarthmore or Cornell and half ended up attending (full pay) and half ended up going elsewhere (public or private) because the second or third school offered significant money.
Do the "top" schools offer merit aid to students like ours? Or is our only way to get a kid to Smith to be able to pay $65K/year?
(disclaimer--i have no idea how my elementary aged kids will fair in the admissions game or if top-50 schools will even be on their radar).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with everything you said with one exception. #1 isn't sacrificing anything. They are not making a choice to give something up. Only #2 is expected to do that.
#1 is already living in "Manassas" (or equivalent), drives a junker, and has no $$ for tennis lessons.
And #1 has provided a stable environment for their child so they are capable of pursuing a top-level education. As has #2. Neither #1 or #2 may have any $$$ left at the end of each month. But only #2 is forced to make a sacrifice.
You know, you are welcome to take a lower paying job or move to a different city if you feel so wronged. Also, you could move to PG County or SE DC and still be in close commuting range for a much smaller mortgage.
You've made my point. Only #2 is being asked to make a sacrifice.
So should #1 move to a cardboard box?
Are you suggesting that #1 has no discretionary income, particularly if they live in a place where the cost of living is low? In this example, I'm not suggesting that #1 is at poverty level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with everything you said with one exception. #1 isn't sacrificing anything. They are not making a choice to give something up. Only #2 is expected to do that.
#1 is already living in "Manassas" (or equivalent), drives a junker, and has no $$ for tennis lessons.
And #1 has provided a stable environment for their child so they are capable of pursuing a top-level education. As has #2. Neither #1 or #2 may have any $$$ left at the end of each month. But only #2 is forced to make a sacrifice.
You know, you are welcome to take a lower paying job or move to a different city if you feel so wronged. Also, you could move to PG County or SE DC and still be in close commuting range for a much smaller mortgage.
You've made my point. Only #2 is being asked to make a sacrifice.
So should #1 move to a cardboard box?
Anonymous wrote:This is ridiculous, with $250k-$400 k income and children in early ES, you should be able to save more than enough. We have older children (one in college and one in HS) and when they were your children's age our HHI was just over $100k. It is now near $200k. We have been able to save enough for them to go to the college's of their choice.
Anonymous wrote:More interesting than lecturing OP on what he or she should do with income is considering the point that while many Wilson kids can get into top tier colleges that do not provide merit aid, many cannot afford to attend but rather choose state or "second-tier" schools. It is important to consider this when using the colleges attended by Wilson grads versus privates as a proxy for the education provided by each.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with everything you said with one exception. #1 isn't sacrificing anything. They are not making a choice to give something up. Only #2 is expected to do that.
#1 is already living in "Manassas" (or equivalent), drives a junker, and has no $$ for tennis lessons.
And #1 has provided a stable environment for their child so they are capable of pursuing a top-level education. As has #2. Neither #1 or #2 may have any $$$ left at the end of each month. But only #2 is forced to make a sacrifice.
You know, you are welcome to take a lower paying job or move to a different city if you feel so wronged. Also, you could move to PG County or SE DC and still be in close commuting range for a much smaller mortgage.
You've made my point. Only #2 is being asked to make a sacrifice.
Anonymous wrote:More interesting than lecturing OP on what he or she should do with income is considering the point that while many Wilson kids can get into top tier colleges that do not provide merit aid, many cannot afford to attend but rather choose state or "second-tier" schools. It is important to consider this when using the colleges attended by Wilson grads versus privates as a proxy for the education provided by each.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More interesting than lecturing OP on what he or she should do with income is considering the point that while many Wilson kids can get into top tier colleges that do not provide merit aid, many cannot afford to attend but rather choose state or "second-tier" schools. It is important to consider this when using the colleges attended by Wilson grads versus privates as a proxy for the education provided by each.
This is not unique to Wilson, it is the same in the well regarded HS in Montgomery, Arlington and Fairfax Counties.
Anonymous wrote:More interesting than lecturing OP on what he or she should do with income is considering the point that while many Wilson kids can get into top tier colleges that do not provide merit aid, many cannot afford to attend but rather choose state or "second-tier" schools. It is important to consider this when using the colleges attended by Wilson grads versus privates as a proxy for the education provided by each.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with everything you said with one exception. #1 isn't sacrificing anything. They are not making a choice to give something up. Only #2 is expected to do that.
#1 is already living in "Manassas" (or equivalent), drives a junker, and has no $$ for tennis lessons.
And #1 has provided a stable environment for their child so they are capable of pursuing a top-level education. As has #2. Neither #1 or #2 may have any $$$ left at the end of each month. But only #2 is forced to make a sacrifice.
You know, you are welcome to take a lower paying job or move to a different city if you feel so wronged. Also, you could move to PG County or SE DC and still be in close commuting range for a much smaller mortgage.