Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But perhaps by announcing in September for the next school year that's exactly what they are doing. Giving schools the time to plan.
good point - in the past this has always been a frenzy in February or March when it was nearly impossible to plan for fall.
Exactly. It cannot exactly come as a shock given they said last year it was cancelled. Then they only made a commitment to one year and basically already said it would not be continued.
I trust that the PTAs at these schools will be able to advocate with they principals to set up good arts programs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But perhaps by announcing in September for the next school year that's exactly what they are doing. Giving schools the time to plan.
good point - in the past this has always been a frenzy in February or March when it was nearly impossible to plan for fall.
Exactly. It cannot exactly come as a shock given they said last year it was cancelled. Then they only made a commitment to one year and basically already said it would not be continued.
I trust that the PTAs at these schools will be able to advocate with they principals to set up good arts programs.
It is impossible. You can't do it without an art room. At least according to what an "art class" universally looks like in DCPS, you can't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But perhaps by announcing in September for the next school year that's exactly what they are doing. Giving schools the time to plan.
good point - in the past this has always been a frenzy in February or March when it was nearly impossible to plan for fall.
Exactly. It cannot exactly come as a shock given they said last year it was cancelled. Then they only made a commitment to one year and basically already said it would not be continued.
I trust that the PTAs at these schools will be able to advocate with they principals to set up good arts programs.
Anonymous wrote:Old Ross parent here again -- JEEZ. You parents who think it will be so great for your full time teachers to "collaborate" with an outside art reacher are deluding yourselves. DCPS teachers have so much on their plates, so little time, to integrate a new outside teacher to take up their space and try and thread lessons in small school houses is --IMPOSSIBLE!!! Fillmore takes the burden off of the FT teachers, places the adventure in the hands of the students, and for the arts-leaning kids it is invaluable. For the kids who "hate it", they will learn to put up with behaving on a school bus for 20 minutes a day and finding some escape from their routine of math/english/sports. Trashing Fillmore is disgraceful, know your history. Will there be a council hearing on the subject? And Fillmore supporters, have you contacted your local council and ANC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But perhaps by announcing in September for the next school year that's exactly what they are doing. Giving schools the time to plan.
good point - in the past this has always been a frenzy in February or March when it was nearly impossible to plan for fall.
Anonymous wrote:But perhaps by announcing in September for the next school year that's exactly what they are doing. Giving schools the time to plan.
No, you are missing the point. This is not about a space for art, it's about incorporating art as a tool for learning.Anonymous wrote:You're missing it: almost every DCPS school in the City has separate space for art, except the Fillmore feeders.
Anonymous wrote:Key and stoddert parents are also upset.
A good administration would say to these schools :
"We are taking away your current art/music program, but we will do X, Y, and Z to ensure your kids still get the same quality arts/music education received by most other DCPS kids"
Thats not happening here. They havent offered to swap the existing trailerd out for double ones to make space, for example, or anything else.