Anonymous wrote:It's not an 8-4 day --
Middle school is 8:45-4:00. Can't imagine K-4 day would be longer.
Anonymous wrote:It's not an 8-4 day --
Middle school is 8:45-4:00. Can't imagine K-4 day would be longer.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe. I went to a Waldorf school on a scholarship growing up, where testing wasn't really done. I attended an Ivy for college (on a Pell grant), and have a PhD from Johns Hopkins. There are many paths to Mecca.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is BASIS different from DC Prep?
Exactly or KIPP. It's one thing to turn up the heat on middle schoolers, but Kindergarteners? Really? This model will probably backfire on a number of kids by sucking the fun out of school.
Doesn't BASIS already have this model in Arizona? How is it working there?
Schools are fully subscribed and their test scores seem pretty strong. But they've only been in the K-4 game for about 3 years.
Are test scores really the only thing that matter for kids ages 5-9? If your answer is "Yes," or "Test scores aren't the only thing, but they're the most important thing for this age group," then are you actually a parent? It's hard for me to believe that parents would want this for their children, but I suppose Basis is counting on this option seeming preferable to some or the poorest-managed DCPS schools.
Actually, if you look at the classical education model, mastery of grammar (building blocks of every subject) is essential. Testing, done well, is a very good tool. I agree that NO kid should advance without mastery of foundations. Why are we so test averse? I am currently homeschooling my 4th grader. He is tested daily (on spelling, English grammar, math facts, history facts...) and commits pretty much everything I teach him to memory. BUT it is not stressful to him. Today, he had to memorize a pronoun chart (subject, object, possessive, reflexive...). He said it was FUN. He's already halfway through Saxon 76. NO stress. Plays golf, plays soccer, plays board games, plays Pokemon, oil paints, plays piano, and TESTS TESTS TESTS. And gets a good night's sleep, and goes on dates with mom and dad, and has great friends. The thing that people worry about is SHAME, I think, that kids are advancing at different levels. The problem is that everyone judges everyone. Testing, done well, is not harmful at all. Judging, however, is. The key for a school that tests a lot is to also build up a child's understand of what it means to make progress instead of shooting for perfection. That understanding has to be cultivated both at home and in school in order for a child to be healthy. I am not arguing that Basis is going to do this well. I am saying that I disagree with all the parents out there who are anti-testing. Testing is best when done daily. You only need to know a limited set of foundational facts between 1st and 4th grade, completely do-able, every school ought to be providing this for their kids. Basis model is amazing because it TRULY is no child left behind in a sense that this model allows nobody to slip through the cracks missing any key concepts. Is is a gift for every child to have gone through school actually having the strong foundation of education. You can't build a house if foundations have cracks.
As a fellow homeschool parent who is interested in transitioning to BASIS, I don't think it's comparable. Testing with a parent is not the same as school. Well, at least not with my child. We "test" a lot, but this is a check-in process for him and me (not resultant in a grade). My child has gotten straight As since Kindergarten (yes, has been homeschooling since K). Our check-in tests are more an evaluation of what I'm doing than what he's doing -- if he's not getting something, it's 100% my fault. Also, we are able to homeschool with traditional text books (also using Saxon math) a couple times a week -- it's not every day. Many mid-day plans are only playdates with other kids. I don't think that is comparable to a 8-4 BASIS day (from what I've read).
I don't want to bash BASIS, because that's actually where I'm hoping to transition.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is BASIS different from DC Prep?
Exactly or KIPP. It's one thing to turn up the heat on middle schoolers, but Kindergarteners? Really? This model will probably backfire on a number of kids by sucking the fun out of school.
Doesn't BASIS already have this model in Arizona? How is it working there?
Schools are fully subscribed and their test scores seem pretty strong. But they've only been in the K-4 game for about 3 years.
Are test scores really the only thing that matter for kids ages 5-9? If your answer is "Yes," or "Test scores aren't the only thing, but they're the most important thing for this age group," then are you actually a parent? It's hard for me to believe that parents would want this for their children, but I suppose Basis is counting on this option seeming preferable to some or the poorest-managed DCPS schools.
Actually, if you look at the classical education model, mastery of grammar (building blocks of every subject) is essential. Testing, done well, is a very good tool. I agree that NO kid should advance without mastery of foundations. Why are we so test averse? I am currently homeschooling my 4th grader. He is tested daily (on spelling, English grammar, math facts, history facts...) and commits pretty much everything I teach him to memory. BUT it is not stressful to him. Today, he had to memorize a pronoun chart (subject, object, possessive, reflexive...). He said it was FUN. He's already halfway through Saxon 76. NO stress. Plays golf, plays soccer, plays board games, plays Pokemon, oil paints, plays piano, and TESTS TESTS TESTS. And gets a good night's sleep, and goes on dates with mom and dad, and has great friends. The thing that people worry about is SHAME, I think, that kids are advancing at different levels. The problem is that everyone judges everyone. Testing, done well, is not harmful at all. Judging, however, is. The key for a school that tests a lot is to also build up a child's understand of what it means to make progress instead of shooting for perfection. That understanding has to be cultivated both at home and in school in order for a child to be healthy. I am not arguing that Basis is going to do this well. I am saying that I disagree with all the parents out there who are anti-testing. Testing is best when done daily. You only need to know a limited set of foundational facts between 1st and 4th grade, completely do-able, every school ought to be providing this for their kids. Basis model is amazing because it TRULY is no child left behind in a sense that this model allows nobody to slip through the cracks missing any key concepts. Is is a gift for every child to have gone through school actually having the strong foundation of education. You can't build a house if foundations have cracks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think frequent low stakes testing helps desensitize kids to testing/makes it less stressful. If we treat tests like they are just part of the learning process ("do this worksheet at your desk and then we'll correct it and hand it back"), I think young children, in particular, are unlikely to be stressed out by them. Truthfully, absent individual kids with anxiety, etc issues (i.e., those who get worked up by things in general and who I wouldn't send to Basis to begin with), I think the kids who get all worked up about tests are usually all worked up by their parents (and/or teachers) and the fact that they are getting all worked up.
Wow, you know zero about mental health disorders and how they develop. Please continue with your shame and blame tactics.
Anonymous wrote:I actually think frequent low stakes testing helps desensitize kids to testing/makes it less stressful. If we treat tests like they are just part of the learning process ("do this worksheet at your desk and then we'll correct it and hand it back"), I think young children, in particular, are unlikely to be stressed out by them. Truthfully, absent individual kids with anxiety, etc issues (i.e., those who get worked up by things in general and who I wouldn't send to Basis to begin with), I think the kids who get all worked up about tests are usually all worked up by their parents (and/or teachers) and the fact that they are getting all worked up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is BASIS different from DC Prep?
Exactly or KIPP. It's one thing to turn up the heat on middle schoolers, but Kindergarteners? Really? This model will probably backfire on a number of kids by sucking the fun out of school.
Doesn't BASIS already have this model in Arizona? How is it working there?
Schools are fully subscribed and their test scores seem pretty strong. But they've only been in the K-4 game for about 3 years.
Are test scores really the only thing that matter for kids ages 5-9? If your answer is "Yes," or "Test scores aren't the only thing, but they're the most important thing for this age group," then are you actually a parent? It's hard for me to believe that parents would want this for their children, but I suppose Basis is counting on this option seeming preferable to some or the poorest-managed DCPS schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm chuckling at the idea of my K student learning note taking strategies. Pictorial notes perhaps? Though 3/4 of the time I still have to ask her to tell me what precisely it is she drew since a person and a dinosaur look essentially the same in her drawings.
The focus on test taking at such an early age holds no appeal to me personally, but maybe there are other parents who prefer that method.
You cannot envision any age appropriate assessments or teaching actual content to young children? I think it is wrong to say that they will be using the same methods as they do in their middle and upper schools. I don't think they are stupid.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just read a lot of the proposal and think they are crazy to think that they will siphon off students from the top Elementaries, just as I still think the McLean private is misguided.
-- happy BASIS DC high school parent
Agree. But Basis McLean enrolled 300 students, across all grades, which was their goal. So maybe they're smarter than all of us.
Anonymous wrote:I'm chuckling at the idea of my K student learning note taking strategies. Pictorial notes perhaps? Though 3/4 of the time I still have to ask her to tell me what precisely it is she drew since a person and a dinosaur look essentially the same in her drawings.
The focus on test taking at such an early age holds no appeal to me personally, but maybe there are other parents who prefer that method.
Anonymous wrote:
Project enrollment/capacity for 8th street building is on page 3 of the proposal http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/report/2016-09-02%20BASIS%20DC%20ES%20Amendment%20Application%20REDACTED.compressed.pdf
Read pages 10-50 at the same link and decide for yourself if the approach is appropriate.
-BDC middle school parent who read 100+ pages of this and would vote NO