Anonymous wrote:They should have asked that question to Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least he admitted he didn't know...?
At least he didn't blame someone else in typical liberal fashion,
Anonymous wrote:What part of keep classified information on secured servers don't you understand, Hillary???
Anonymous wrote:At least he admitted he didn't know...?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was a carefully chosen gotcha question - no doubt. They prob have data that shows Johnson is stealing more votes from Hillary than from Trump.
Please describe your definition of a "gotcha" question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was a carefully chosen gotcha question - no doubt. They prob have data that shows Johnson is stealing more votes from Hillary than from Trump.
Please describe your definition of a "gotcha" question.
Anonymous wrote:It was a carefully chosen gotcha question - no doubt. They prob have data that shows Johnson is stealing more votes from Hillary than from Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was a carefully chosen gotcha question - no doubt. They prob have data that shows Johnson is stealing more votes from Hillary than from Trump.
The way MB repeated "ALEPPO" and seared into him with his eyes tells me it was an intentional attempt to expose Johnson for his ignorance.
Um, This is what it means to have Aleppo seared into you:
It means a transparently fake photo staged for political purposes?
OMG -- do some of you people really think that photo was staged? Really???
Yes it was staged. All those "boo hoo hoo poor Syrians" photos are staged.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-wounded-boy-in-orange-seat-another-staged-white-helmets-stunt/5541662
Do you think photos from the Holocaust were staged too? You know, the giant shoe piles and the emaciated prisoners? All staged?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While it's strange for anybody following current event not having heard of Aleppo... We really should not know or care. Let alone fight there.
? We shouldn't know or care about world events and that there is a humanitarian crisis? Okaaay.
No, Americans should not care about humanitarian crises elsewhere.
In point of fact, "we should mind our own business" used to be the basic Libertarian foreign policy platform.
Well, I'm thankful that the Libertarians aren't ruling this country. So, if there is a humanitarian crisis the US shouldn't help. We should not be involved in NATO or the UN. We should build a wall around this country and stick our heads in the ground. Can you name me one successful country that has this kind of foreign policy, where they are not involved in the UN or provide humanitarian assistance?
North Korea?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was a carefully chosen gotcha question - no doubt. They prob have data that shows Johnson is stealing more votes from Hillary than from Trump.
The way MB repeated "ALEPPO" and seared into him with his eyes tells me it was an intentional attempt to expose Johnson for his ignorance.
Um, This is what it means to have Aleppo seared into you:
It means a transparently fake photo staged for political purposes?
OMG -- do some of you people really think that photo was staged? Really???
Yes it was staged. All those "boo hoo hoo poor Syrians" photos are staged.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-wounded-boy-in-orange-seat-another-staged-white-helmets-stunt/5541662
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While it's strange for anybody following current event not having heard of Aleppo... We really should not know or care. Let alone fight there.
? We shouldn't know or care about world events and that there is a humanitarian crisis? Okaaay.
No, Americans should not care about humanitarian crises elsewhere.
In point of fact, "we should mind our own business" used to be the basic Libertarian foreign policy platform.
Well, I'm thankful that the Libertarians aren't ruling this country. So, if there is a humanitarian crisis the US shouldn't help. We should not be involved in NATO or the UN. We should build a wall around this country and stick our heads in the ground. Can you name me one successful country that has this kind of foreign policy, where they are not involved in the UN or provide humanitarian assistance?
Anonymous wrote:I'd still take Johnson over Trump because I think Johnson will actually take the time to learn more and listen to other people who know more rather than assume he knows everything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
In point of fact, "we should mind our own business" used to be the basic Libertarian foreign policy platform.
Well, I'm thankful that the Libertarians aren't ruling this country. So, if there is a humanitarian crisis the US shouldn't help. We should not be involved in NATO or the UN. We should build a wall around this country and stick our heads in the ground. Can you name me one successful country that has this kind of foreign policy, where they are not involved in the UN or provide humanitarian assistance?
Yes. The USA from 1789 to 1945.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
In point of fact, "we should mind our own business" used to be the basic Libertarian foreign policy platform.
Well, I'm thankful that the Libertarians aren't ruling this country. So, if there is a humanitarian crisis the US shouldn't help. We should not be involved in NATO or the UN. We should build a wall around this country and stick our heads in the ground. Can you name me one successful country that has this kind of foreign policy, where they are not involved in the UN or provide humanitarian assistance?