Anonymous wrote:
One more thing, and you'll call me old-fashioned for this one. I see kids waiting for the public school bus as I drive my DS to his private. They're dressed like slobs, hair is overgrown, they look a mess. Kids at our school are presented nicely, they learn how to speak in front of groups that include classmates, parents and teachers. Appearances and verbal presentations matter. Private schools teach it, public doesn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son is in a private K that I love. Three recess times a day, two snacks, and a fresh lunch made from scratch daily! There are about 14 kids in the class and 1-2 teachers depending on the time of day. It is very personal, warm, and non-institutional. I just love it.
Can you please share which school?
Anonymous wrote:13:26 - this covers it.
I'll add that our private includes a 'character' component that increases expectations of good behavior, encourages kids to do the right thing, not the easy or expedient thing. It needs to be said.
One more thing, and you'll call me old-fashioned for this one. I see kids waiting for the public school bus as I drive my DS to his private. They're dressed like slobs, hair is overgrown, they look a mess. Kids at our school are presented nicely, they learn how to speak in front of groups that include classmates, parents and teachers. Appearances and verbal presentations matter. Private schools teach it, public doesn't.
Anonymous wrote:13:26 - this covers it.
I'll add that our private includes a 'character' component that increases expectations of good behavior, encourages kids to do the right thing, not the easy or expedient thing. It needs to be said.
One more thing, and you'll call me old-fashioned for this one. I see kids waiting for the public school bus as I drive my DS to his private. They're dressed like slobs, hair is overgrown, they look a mess. Kids at our school are presented nicely, they learn how to speak in front of groups that include classmates, parents and teachers. Appearances and verbal presentations matter. Private schools teach it, public doesn't.
Anonymous wrote:
I also have experiences with having children in both DCPS and private schools in NW DC. I will say that we have had phenomenal teachers in both public and private. The academics in private have been better- richer, more thorough, greater care taken to deliver material in a meaningful way. My kids in DCPS were given as much, but not more, than they needed to know for testing purposes. It just felt really uninspired. I think the teachers we had at DCPS were fabulous, and would have much preferred to take a different approach to instruction; but their hands were tied.
Our experiences in private K vs public K, were more rest time, more outdoor time, more time to explore and be creative.
Anonymous wrote:I have kids in both DC public elementary (NW DC) and big-3 DC privates. Not sure how much things differ in MoCo but probably fairly similar. From my perspective, similarities and differences are --
- core academics are the same - excellent
- teachers are the same quality/caring/concern.
Differences are minor from my perspective:
- language instruction is nonexistent or infrequent in DCPS elementary
- art and music class are each once a week (compared to 2-3 times a week for each in private elementary)
- gym class is better focused in private
Anonymous wrote:My kids have been to both, one was in public through 4 th, the other just through 1st. The big motivator to move was that our. Highly ranked public (10 rated, three percent FARMS) in Baltimore County stopped having homogenous classes for math and language arts and moved to a heterogenous class room, which just doesn't work well with 25 to 30 kids in a class. Parents had no say in the decision and no real recourse given that decisions are made on a county wide basis in Maryland. The curriculum was tightly controlled by the county as well.
My kids have more recess and specials like a foreign language, science with a dedicated teacher who teaches only that subject for elementary schools, tech with dedicated maker space rooms, gym much more frequently and real sports are taught, as opposed to the dodge ball and tag that was the norm in our public. Teachers have full control over the curriculum, and there is no teaching towards a test. The school day is longer. The facilities are eons better. Class sizes are half or less than we had in public. Athletics teams are required in middle and high school so there are opportunities for all kids to participate.
I disagree with you. All children need a few minutes to rest after recess even if it is just a quiet time to read with soft music playing in the background. To deny a child that time of the day is not taking into account the needs of all learners.Anonymous wrote:If they are not ready for K, best to hold them back a year like DCUM standard dictates. As a teacher, one would hope you got them prepared academically and socially. If your kid needs rest time in K, they do no belong in K.
Anonymous wrote:I am a longtime primary grade teacher in MCPS and I am looking for a "different" experience for my son for kindergarten next year. Different meaning something more developmentally appropriate--more play, maybe rest/quiet time for a few minutes in the afternoon, less "rigor". I LOVE my job, but just know that if I can afford it, I'd like something different for my kids. (Do I wish that I could change the system for all the kids in public school? Sure! But nobody is asking me what I think!)
So...are private schools any different in the younger grades? Or is there a lot of academic push there too? We are definitely planning to do the open houses this fall but just curious what the general thought about it is here.