Anonymous wrote:I just started Big Little Lies based on this thread. It's pretty good!
Anonymous wrote:Criteria:
~No violence or torture. Girl on the Train is ok, Unbroken is not.
~No abuse/death of children. My Sister's Keeper is ok, A Child Called It is not ok.
~No series or trilogies. With the exception of Harry Potter, I suck at reading trilogies.
I prefer popular fiction. I like a book where SOMETHING happens: murder mysteries, disappearances, or general suburban life gone wrong.
Favorite include:
~Orphan Train
~Husband's Secret, Big Little Lies, What Alice Forgot
~Calling Me Home
~Help
~Water for Elephants
~We Were Liars
~Little Children
~older Jodi Picoult books: Pact, Sister's Keepers
~Defending Jacob
All time favorites include Time Travelers Wife, World According to Garp, and Gone with the Wind.
I recently tried Cutting for Stone but quit. Also tried Outlander but quit. It wasn't so much the length but that I got bogged down by details and didn't love the characters.
HELP!!!
Anonymous wrote:The new Ann Tyler, "Vinegar Girl", based on The Taming of the Shrew sounds good.
Of course I love anything Ann Tyler, though never read her last book, "The Blue Spool"
The new Laura Lippman also sounds good, "Wilde Lake", set in Columbia, MD
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the Shopaholic books by Sophia Kinsella?
WAY too fluffy for me! I like bestsellers, but they need to be a bit more meaty than that.
It is adorable that you think Jodi Picoult novels are more "meaty" than the Shopaholic books.
Seriously, the PP who asserted you would like books that have been made into movies with familiar actors is correct.
Have you read both? Dr. Seuss is more "meaty" than the Shopaholic books.
Yes, I've read both. Jodi Picoult writes hackneyed, formulaic commercial fiction that is the literary equivalent of a Big Mac. A female Dan Brown, if you will. If you don't notice the bad writing, I can't explain it to you.
My point is that on a scale of fluffy books I think the Shopaholic series is so much more fluffy and empty than Jodi Picoult that it manages to make Picoult's writing seem meaty by comparison. Picoult is entertaining. Shopaholic made me feel like I lost brain cells reading it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Spoiler alert, but Poisonwood Bible has at least one of the things on the OP's "no go" list. I am having a hard time thinking of adult books that have no violence or deaths of children.
If OP reallly wants books with no violence at all, she probably should just stick with fluflfy books like Shopaholic.
I didn't say no violence at all. I said no violence to children.
Such as a nonfiction book about children in African who become soldiers. That's a no go for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the Shopaholic books by Sophia Kinsella?
WAY too fluffy for me! I like bestsellers, but they need to be a bit more meaty than that.
It is adorable that you think Jodi Picoult novels are more "meaty" than the Shopaholic books.
Seriously, the PP who asserted you would like books that have been made into movies with familiar actors is correct.
Have you read both? Dr. Seuss is more "meaty" than the Shopaholic books.
Yes, I've read both. Jodi Picoult writes hackneyed, formulaic commercial fiction that is the literary equivalent of a Big Mac. A female Dan Brown, if you will. If you don't notice the bad writing, I can't explain it to you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Defending Jacob is my favorite book!
You should read Finding Jake and Afterwards.
Ugh I hated that book. But if you liked it you may also like The Dinner.
Anonymous wrote:Defending Jacob is my favorite book!
You should read Finding Jake and Afterwards.