Anonymous wrote:

Even then, entire governments in the U.S. subscribed to KKK ideology and were active members.

????please explain

Even then, entire governments in the U.S. subscribed to KKK ideology and were active members.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As far as I am aware there is not a huge gay army killing people around the world in many different countries to support the overthrow of governments and otherwise causing chaos.

Enough with the red herrings already. He was Muslim, he killed in the name of Islam. It's an ideology that helps people who might be prone to kill for other reasons justify mass murder as ethically correct.

I'm not aware of a gay ideology that justifies mass murder. That he may have happened to be gay is completely irrelevant. It may explain some of his underlying complex motivations but it doesn't excuse the fact that he did it in the name of Islam and Islam specifically supports the murder of gays.

Here are Christians who kill blacks in the name of Christianity. Now if you see an issue with this, maybe you will understand how Muslims feel about whack jobs who use Islam to justify their acts of madness.

Not the PP. Even then, Christians rejected the KKK. Entire governments in the Middle East abuse and kill homosexuals and women.

"It looks increasingly like this may have been the act of a seriously troubled individual whose personal problems dwarfed any last-minute inspiration from radical groups," said a senior U.S. official familiar with the investigation, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Mateen said he was worn out from staying up all night to research psychiatric medication, although he did not say he was taking specific drugs.

“He’d been real worried about whether or not he’d slipped into psychosis," the acquaintance said. “He wasn’t as friendly. He was obsessed with researching medication online.”

Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t change anything.

The killer was a cowardly, hateful piece of crap inspired by the hate spewed by Islamic radicalism.
His sexual “preference” does not change that.

Anonymous wrote:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21729362



Consanguineous marriages in Afghanistan.
Saify K1, Saadat M.
Author information
Abstract
The present cross-sectional study was done in order to illustrate the prevalence and types of consanguineous marriages among Afghanistan populations. Data on types of marriages were collected using a simple questionnaire. The total number of couples in the study was 7140 from the following provinces: Badakhshan, Baghlan, Balkh, Bamyan, Kabul, Kunduz, Samangan and Takhar. Consanguineous marriages were classified by the degree of relationship between couples: double first cousins, first cousins, first cousins once removed, second cousins and beyond second cousins. The coefficient of inbreeding (F) was calculated for each couple and the mean coefficient of inbreeding (?) estimated for each population. The proportion of consanguineous marriages in the country was 46.2%, ranging from 38.2% in Kabul province to 51.2% in Bamyan province. The equivalent mean inbreeding coefficient (?) was 0.0277, and ranged from 0.0221 to 0.0293 in these two regions. There were significant differences between provinces for frequencies of different types of marriages (p<0.001). First cousin marriages (27.8%) were the most common type of consanguineous marriages, followed by double first cousin (6.9%), second cousin (5.8%), beyond second cousin (3.9%) and first cousin once removed (1.8%). There were significant differences between ethnic groups for the types of marriages (?2=177.6, df=25, p<0.001). Tajiks (Soni) and Turkmens (also Pashtuns) showed the lowest (?=0.0250) and highest (?=0.0297) mean inbreeding coefficients, respectively, among the ethnic groups in Afghanistan. The study shows that Afghanistan's populations, like other Islamic populations, have a high level of consanguinity.

PMID: 21729362 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

PP here. I know an Afghan woman who was forced to marry her first cousin here in the US. I don't think it's legal here and I don't know how they were able to do it, but they did. And her brother was schizophrenic.

Almost half of marriages in Afghanistan are first cousins. Shockingly, seven percent are double first cousins (parents of bride and groom were brothers married to sisters).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is such bad news for ISIS. Do you know how much paperwork is involved in revoking the allegiance of someone posthumously?

Seriously, though. This man was not radicalized in the name of the Islamic religion. He went to the nightclub regularly for three years, drinking while there. You know who doesn't drink at nightclubs? Devout Muslims don't.

The FBI was confused by his claims to belong to several groups that were at odds with each other. Now it makes sense: He didn't know is Hezzbollah from his ISIS and wasn't inspired by any religion. He just claimed that to distract himself and/or project the image of who he wanted people to see him as, not as he really was.

He was a mentally deranged, murderous monster who was also homophobic and gay.

This will not "change the story," though. The story is out there and set and each side will use it to push their own narrative.

This is just not true. I know of at least two friends - devout Muslims - big drinkers and partiers.
The imbibe secretly. Away from family.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And yet, he, himself, praised terrorists and Islam.
There are more transcripts that have not yet been released. I wonder what he says on those.

It could be that he had multiple motivations or as simple as "I am an Islamic soldier" sounding better to him than "I am a closeted gay man who feels used".


Edit: I am also interested in the unreleased transcripts.

Anonymous wrote:And yet, he, himself, praised terrorists and Islam.
There are more transcripts that have not yet been released. I wonder what he says on those.

jsteele wrote:Universion has an interview with a gay who claims he was Mateen's gay lover. If this information is accurate, the attack may have had a lot more to do with Mateen's closeted homosexuality than his religion:

http://www.univision.com/univision-news/united-states/orlando-massacre-was-revenge-not-terrorism-says-man-who-claims-he-was-gunmans-lover

"Omar Mateen, the Muslim gunman who committed the Pulse nightclub massacre in Orlando, was '100 percent' gay and bore a grudge against Latino men because he felt used by them, according to a man who says he was his lover for two months."

...

"He said Mateen was angry and upset after a man he had sex with later revealed he was infected with the HIV virus."

and:

"He [Omar] was terrified that he was infected," he said. "I asked him, 'Did you do a test?' Yes. He went to the pharmacy and did the test … it came out negative but it doesn't come out right away. It takes 4, 5 months."

"When I asked him what he was going to do now, his answer was 'I'm going to make them pay for what they did to me.'"