Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When the radical Islamic terrorists detonate a dirty bomb in DC, how many of you pro gun control people will wish they had a weapon to protect their home and family?
None. If that happens we'll be dying of radiation poisoning
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.
*driving range
I am completely, 100% ok with law-abiding shooters using their guns at a gun range having to spend a little extra time reloading. I think we should only sell magazines with individual bullets, frankly.
Anonymous wrote:When the radical Islamic terrorists detonate a dirty bomb in DC, how many of you pro gun control people will wish they had a weapon to protect their home and family?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.
*driving range
I am completely, 100% ok with law-abiding shooters using their guns at a gun range having to spend a little extra time reloading. I think we should only sell magazines with individual bullets, frankly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.
*driving range
I am completely, 100% ok with law-abiding shooters using their guns at a gun range having to spend a little extra time reloading. I think we should only sell magazines with individual bullets, frankly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.
So then rent the guns and shoot them there at the range. Don't take them home. You still get to shoot and the guns are not available to the public.
And then no criminal will ever have access to guns, because they clearly will follow this rule and so many guns used in crimes are obtained legally!![]()
Fewer. We're not shooting (ha) for none. That's impossible. Fewer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.
*driving range
I am completely, 100% ok with law-abiding shooters using their guns at a gun range having to spend a little extra time reloading. I think we should only sell magazines with individual bullets, frankly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.
So then rent the guns and shoot them there at the range. Don't take them home. You still get to shoot and the guns are not available to the public.
And then no criminal will ever have access to guns, because they clearly will follow this rule and so many guns used in crimes are obtained legally!![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.
So then rent the guns and shoot them there at the range. Don't take them home. You still get to shoot and the guns are not available to the public.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.
*driving range
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.
So then rent the guns and shoot them there at the range. Don't take them home. You still get to shoot and the guns are not available to the public.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a ban on semi-automatics aaide, why do so many of you have problems with banning large capacity magazines?
Because law-abiding shooters who use their guns to shoot at targets at a gun range don't want to spend all their range time reloading magazines when they could be shooting. It's the same concept as getting a big bucket of balls at the declining range instead of the three that come in the box.
It's not nearly as nefarious as gun control advocates make it sound.