Anonymous wrote:Obviously I know there's no obligation to play with my kid. My question is more about whether it is annoying when people bring their own toys to a toddler playground with the expectation that it is not going to be a distraction/object of interest for other kids. For example, there are plenty of times that I have thought about bringing a toy to story time for my child, but I've always refrained because I don't want the toy to be an object of contention.
Anonymous wrote:Op here, just out of curiosity, if the toy was not a frisbee but one of those remote controlled helicopters-would your answer still be the same? Again, my issue isn't that people have to play with my kid (I'd hardly expect anyone to let my kid touch a remote/helicopter) but that bringing your own toys to a small 0-3 playground is distracting and annoying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP - DCUM is NEVER unanimous, and in this case, it is. You are wrong. That dad had EVERY right to bring the frisbee to the tot lot.
Um, no, it is not unanimous in this case.
Of course the dad has every right to bring a toy to a playground, but he should come with the expectation that other kids are going to be interested in it and set that expectation with his kid, too. His kid is old enough to learn about social interaction in a public place; an 18 month old, not so much.
It's weird and unsettling to me that so many here believe that a basic decency like generosity - about a $5 toy, no less - is "wrong."
You said "Of course the dad has every right to bring a toy to a playground" -- so you are in fact agreeing with the rest of us. Yes, it would have been more polite to include the toddler, but she is saying he shouldn't have brought it AT ALL. Which is not the case.
She is? Where?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP - DCUM is NEVER unanimous, and in this case, it is. You are wrong. That dad had EVERY right to bring the frisbee to the tot lot.
Um, no, it is not unanimous in this case.
Of course the dad has every right to bring a toy to a playground, but he should come with the expectation that other kids are going to be interested in it and set that expectation with his kid, too. His kid is old enough to learn about social interaction in a public place; an 18 month old, not so much.
It's weird and unsettling to me that so many here believe that a basic decency like generosity - about a $5 toy, no less - is "wrong."
You said "Of course the dad has every right to bring a toy to a playground" -- so you are in fact agreeing with the rest of us. Yes, it would have been more polite to include the toddler, but she is saying he shouldn't have brought it AT ALL. Which is not the case.
Anonymous wrote:Of course they can bring their own toy. No, they don't have to share while they are actively playing with it. No one ever has to share (whether they are playing with it or not)...but offering turns is always nice and appreciated. To little kids, babies are annoying and can ruin games because they want to grab everything and 'get in the way'. The father was there to play with his kid, not yours. That's just kind of how it goes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be sure and tell us all the juicy details of how you got your ass-whupped when you tried to tell someone that they can't bring personal stuff to the playground OP...
Why would I bring it up to the father? It was just an annoying event that I posted about. Not every annoying event in one's life requires action and confrontation.
Wait, what?
So now you're saying the whole circumstance wasn't that serious was just a minor irritation and there was no need to actually say or do anything at the moment as minor irritations should be dismissed, but nonetheless you feel compelled to determinedly recruit anonymous opinion-allies so that you can...
So that you can do what exactly?
Should you secure the sufficient number of supportive comments to feel justified in your annoyance just what do you plan to do OP?
You gonna hold your head high and smile smugly knowing you're the far more sophisticated parent with proper etiquette the next time you're at the park and some kid is playing with a toy that your kid isn't invited to play with?
Is that the master plan you've come up with to get back at those inconsiderate personal-stuff-bringers...self-righteous indignation?
Look I don't know the circumstances of your life, but in my life, this was not a major event. It was, in fact, a minor irritation. If it happens again, I'll be mildly irritated. I don't think it's worthy of a real life discussion. It's not even worthy of that stupid meme you posted. You can't confront every person for every perceived trespass/annoying thing. You come to DCUM, vent, and internalize the posters who agree with you. That's how the Internet works.
Anonymous wrote:This is one ofthe most bizarre threads I have seen on here. I just don't get it. There are other more important things to worry about. Go to the park, have fun, be decent to neighbors. Bring a toy or not it is so not important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be sure and tell us all the juicy details of how you got your ass-whupped when you tried to tell someone that they can't bring personal stuff to the playground OP...
Why would I bring it up to the father? It was just an annoying event that I posted about. Not every annoying event in one's life requires action and confrontation.
Wait, what?
So now you're saying the whole circumstance wasn't that serious was just a minor irritation and there was no need to actually say or do anything at the moment as minor irritations should be dismissed, but nonetheless you feel compelled to determinedly recruit anonymous opinion-allies so that you can...
So that you can do what exactly?
Should you secure the sufficient number of supportive comments to feel justified in your annoyance just what do you plan to do OP?
You gonna hold your head high and smile smugly knowing you're the far more sophisticated parent with proper etiquette the next time you're at the park and some kid is playing with a toy that your kid isn't invited to play with?
Is that the master plan you've come up with to get back at those inconsiderate personal-stuff-bringers...self-righteous indignation?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be sure and tell us all the juicy details of how you got your ass-whupped when you tried to tell someone that they can't bring personal stuff to the playground OP...
Why would I bring it up to the father? It was just an annoying event that I posted about. Not every annoying event in one's life requires action and confrontation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP - DCUM is NEVER unanimous, and in this case, it is. You are wrong. That dad had EVERY right to bring the frisbee to the tot lot.
Um, no, it is not unanimous in this case.
Of course the dad has every right to bring a toy to a playground, but he should come with the expectation that other kids are going to be interested in it and set that expectation with his kid, too. His kid is old enough to learn about social interaction in a public place; an 18 month old, not so much.
It's weird and unsettling to me that so many here believe that a basic decency like generosity - about a $5 toy, no less - is "wrong."