Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're going out with new people, and you haven't discussed it before, it's rude to assume they'll be willing to subsidize your meal if you didn't order the same things. It's ruder still to act like THEY are gauche for assuming there would be separate checks c
Totally agree. Some people have money but no class...and that's if these jokers are actually millionaires. If I had a dime for each time someone on DCUM says "we have a seven figure income..."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We typically split everything down the middle with friends. Someone always has an extra drink or a more expensive meal - if it's friends, are you really keeping track? If there are kids, if we're 4 ppl and you are 5 ppl, divide by 9 and do the math. If it's younger people (nieces/nephews) we pick up the check. Do the same for our kids friends - if they are with us, we're paying. If it's people who are really scraping by, we entertain at home and serve the food we want to and no one expects to pay for that except us.
Voice of reason.
I think it comes down to this: if you can't afford to eat out, DON'T. (And I say this as a person who passed up plenty of invitations during leaner times.)
Being able to afford YOUR MEAL is not the same as being able to afford to pay for the meal of a millionaire buying bottles of wine. Is this really hard to grasp? You are either clueless or deliberately obtuse.
C'mon, if you don't have two dimes to rub together, should you be hanging out with "millionaires" and then bitch that they spend a lot of money?
C'mon, if you're a millionaire, should you be splitting hairs about someone not wanting to pay for your food, or should you just pick up the bill like a decent person??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bring cash, tally in head + tip, place cash in receipt holder.
Sure but sometimes (often) the people who do this are stingy or can't do math or undertip and then the person figuring out the final tally gets stuck with the difference.
Anonymous wrote:If you're going out with new people, and you haven't discussed it before, it's rude to assume they'll be willing to subsidize your meal if you didn't order the same things. It's ruder still to act like THEY are gauche for assuming there would be separate checks c
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We typically split everything down the middle with friends. Someone always has an extra drink or a more expensive meal - if it's friends, are you really keeping track? If there are kids, if we're 4 ppl and you are 5 ppl, divide by 9 and do the math. If it's younger people (nieces/nephews) we pick up the check. Do the same for our kids friends - if they are with us, we're paying. If it's people who are really scraping by, we entertain at home and serve the food we want to and no one expects to pay for that except us.
Voice of reason.
I think it comes down to this: if you can't afford to eat out, DON'T. (And I say this as a person who passed up plenty of invitations during leaner times.)
Being able to afford YOUR MEAL is not the same as being able to afford to pay for the meal of a millionaire buying bottles of wine. Is this really hard to grasp? You are either clueless or deliberately obtuse.
C'mon, if you don't have two dimes to rub together, should you be hanging out with "millionaires" and then bitch that they spend a lot of money?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We typically split everything down the middle with friends. Someone always has an extra drink or a more expensive meal - if it's friends, are you really keeping track? If there are kids, if we're 4 ppl and you are 5 ppl, divide by 9 and do the math. If it's younger people (nieces/nephews) we pick up the check. Do the same for our kids friends - if they are with us, we're paying. If it's people who are really scraping by, we entertain at home and serve the food we want to and no one expects to pay for that except us.
Voice of reason.
I think it comes down to this: if you can't afford to eat out, DON'T. (And I say this as a person who passed up plenty of invitations during leaner times.)
Being able to afford YOUR MEAL is not the same as being able to afford to pay for the meal of a millionaire buying bottles of wine. Is this really hard to grasp? You are either clueless or deliberately obtuse.
Anonymous wrote:Situations differ, but in general if you split bill evenly chances are you'd be paying few dollars over or under what you'd pay if itemized. There's something to be said for keeping it pleasant and tipping generously, so I consider it well worth the money to have a pleasant meal with friends even if I end up paying little more then Suzie.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a former server, just split it evenly. Separate checks are a nightmare.
One check itemized by person isn't complicated at all, particularly if everyone pays by CC.
Another former server here, and I agree with PP. Unless you have an operating system that allows you to itemize by customer by default - adding items to Seat 1/Seat 2 etc - it IS a nightmare. Giving the table the check to make notes on, creating new checks for each customer and then splitting off each dish from the original check, in addition to splitting wine/Pellegrino/appetizers/desserts four (or more!) ways equally. It takes forever (as OP noted).
Never worked at a restaurant that didn't have that option. Even so, that's part of the job. People shouldn't have to subsidize someone's meal to make the server happy.
Well, there's a reason why lots of restaurants don't do separate checks, or only allow splitting the bill by X amount of ways. It's a time suck for the server, which leads to lower profits. It forces the server to spend 5+ minutes, which is a LONG TIME when you're waiting tables, standing in front of the computer, splitting everything up, printing everything out, running credit cards, bringing everything back.
"It's part of the job" is a ridiculous thing to say. Why not just bring cash if you know you're going to need to be splitting?
Anonymous wrote:Bring cash, tally in head + tip, place cash in receipt holder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously. I went to a bday party dinner and ordered a salad and one glass of wine because I'm broke. Everyone else had steaks and millions of glasses of wine. My share of the bill was $225. I was so mad.
I don't believe this.
I don't either.
I am glad places like Chili's and Red Robin have a machine right at the table that allow people to split the bill.
No one that has a seven figure income would be posting something like this, so I don't buy that either.
I think this just proves the point that itemizing is for cheap/poor people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously. I went to a bday party dinner and ordered a salad and one glass of wine because I'm broke. Everyone else had steaks and millions of glasses of wine. My share of the bill was $225. I was so mad.
I don't believe this.
I don't either.
I am glad places like Chili's and Red Robin have a machine right at the table that allow people to split the bill.
No one that has a seven figure income would be posting something like this, so I don't buy that either.