If you don't use the term terrorists, terrorist win.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

????
The pp said “likely.” And is simply reporting what CNN has said.
You sound like you work for the Obama administration.
You know.... banning the word, “terror.”

LOL. It was the Bush administration that went all Orwellian language on us, not Obama.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

????
The pp said “likely.” And is simply reporting what CNN has said.
You sound like you work for the Obama administration.
You know.... banning the word, “terror.”

Just stop. We don't know the facts yet. Shit gets spun and the true narrative changes. This is a tragedy, and again, we don't know yet what happened.

Right, we don't know what happened which is why we are discussing it and using phrases such as "likely" and "possible", not phrases such as "was with 100% certainty".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Lady, I'm quoting CNN. Please don't all-caps me. Nothing was typed to offend anyone, it was typed as a direct quote from a newsite.

Go take a look - http://www.cnn.com/

You can't ban people from using the term "terrorism" on a forum board speculating on a plane crash.

She didn't ban you. She forcefully asked you to refrain from sharing news that ISN'T NEWS yet. And yes, I went all caps on you.

This is a discussion thread - what are we discussing if we aren't sharing possible causes? The plane either had mechanical failure, was the target of terrorism, or the pilot took the plane down (could or could not be terrorism). I'm not sure why saying that one of these is the more likely cause of the plane going down (per the news - who happen to be quoting actual sources, not speculating) is a problem for you.

Attack more likely behind Egypt plane crisis than technical fault: Egypt minister - http://www.reuters.com/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

????
The pp said “likely.” And is simply reporting what CNN has said.
You sound like you work for the Obama administration.
You know.... banning the word, “terror.”

Just stop. We don't know the facts yet. Shit gets spun and the true narrative changes. This is a tragedy, and again, we don't know yet what happened.

Good Lord. Even the Egyptian officials are saying it was likely terror.
I think people can handle the speculating..........

The mis-statements by Egyptian officials have nothing whatsoever to do with controlling the narrative.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Lady, I'm quoting CNN. Please don't all-caps me. Nothing was typed to offend anyone, it was typed as a direct quote from a newsite.

Go take a look - http://www.cnn.com/

You can't ban people from using the term "terrorism" on a forum board speculating on a plane crash.

She didn't ban you. She forcefully asked you to refrain from sharing news that ISN'T NEWS yet. And yes, I went all caps on you.

CNN is generally regarded as news and they're saying more likely terror than technical.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

????
The pp said “likely.” And is simply reporting what CNN has said.
You sound like you work for the Obama administration.
You know.... banning the word, “terror.”

Just stop. We don't know the facts yet. Shit gets spun and the true narrative changes. This is a tragedy, and again, we don't know yet what happened.

Good Lord. Even the Egyptian officials are saying it was likely terror.
I think people can handle the speculating..........

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Lady, I'm quoting CNN. Please don't all-caps me. Nothing was typed to offend anyone, it was typed as a direct quote from a newsite.

Go take a look - http://www.cnn.com/

You can't ban people from using the term "terrorism" on a forum board speculating on a plane crash.

She didn't ban you. She forcefully asked you to refrain from sharing news that ISN'T NEWS yet. And yes, I went all caps on you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

????
The pp said “likely.” And is simply reporting what CNN has said.
You sound like you work for the Obama administration.
You know.... banning the word, “terror.”

Just stop. We don't know the facts yet. Shit gets spun and the true narrative changes. This is a tragedy, and again, we don't know yet what happened.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

????
The pp said “likely.” And is simply reporting what CNN has said.
You sound like you work for the Obama administration.
You know.... banning the word, “terror.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Lady, I'm quoting CNN. Please don't all-caps me. Nothing was typed to offend anyone, it was typed as a direct quote from a newsite.

Go take a look - http://www.cnn.com/

You can't ban people from using the term "terrorism" on a forum board speculating on a plane crash.

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

horrifying. my prayers for the victims and their families. may they find peace in God and heaven. What is happening to this world? what a shock.

Anonymous wrote:Apparently wreckage has been spotted by a Maersk vessel that is doing SAR.

If you want to check the scuttlebutt and prognosticating by the guys who drive these planes, here's the thread

http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/579183-egyptair-804-disappears-radar-paris-cairo-6.html

fascinating