Anonymous wrote:Class of 2017 graduation report is, again, revealing.
Some kids going to strong state schools: UVA(18), W&M (7), VTech (15), JMU (15), GMU (14), UMW (5), VCU (25), CNU (2), VMI.
Some kids going to selective private and out of state flagships: Cornell, Princeton (2), Duke (3), Rice, Northwestern, Notre Dame, Georgetown (2), NYU, Naval Academy, West Point (3),Tufts, Amherst, Barnard, Wesleyan, Smith (2), Lehigh, GWU, Northeastern, Bama, Auburn, Georgia, Minnesota, Penn State, Ohio State, West Virginia (2), South Carolina (2).
Given the high poverty rate at TC, and the guaranteed transfer options available in Virginia, it's not surprising that 139 are headed to NOVA.
What disappoints me as an ACPS parent is that the press release speaks only of the college bound. That's only 354 out of 720 kids. What about the other half of the class? I do not think that college is the right place for every 18 year old kid. But shouldn't ACPS be reporting on the future plans of the other graduates? If the vast majority of those kids will be enlisting in the military, entering apprenticeships, or taking jobs that will lead to living wages as a result of vocational training they received while in high school, I would be thrilled to see that data and satisfied that the $17,000 per pupil per year is being well spent by ACPS. But if more than half of TC Williams' graduating class will spend next year flipping burgers, cutting grass, playing video games while living in mom's basement, day laboring, raising kids on welfare, drug dealing, etc. then ACPS is failing miserably. ACPS leaders must start gathering data and reporting outcomes for the non-college bound graduates if they want to assure us (as they always do) that they are doing a great job considering their demographics challenges.
Anonymous wrote:Class of 2017 graduation report is, again, revealing.
Some kids going to strong state schools: UVA(18), W&M (7), VTech (15), JMU (15), GMU (14), UMW (5), VCU (25), CNU (2), VMI.
Some kids going to selective private and out of state flagships: Cornell, Princeton (2), Duke (3), Rice, Northwestern, Notre Dame, Georgetown (2), NYU, Naval Academy, West Point (3),Tufts, Amherst, Barnard, Wesleyan, Smith (2), Lehigh, GWU, Northeastern, Bama, Auburn, Georgia, Minnesota, Penn State, Ohio State, West Virginia (2), South Carolina (2).
Given the high poverty rate at TC, and the guaranteed transfer options available in Virginia, it's not surprising that 139 are headed to NOVA.
What disappoints me as an ACPS parent is that the press release speaks only of the college bound. That's only 354 out of 720 kids. What about the other half of the class? I do not think that college is the right place for every 18 year old kid. But shouldn't ACPS be reporting on the future plans of the other graduates? If the vast majority of those kids will be enlisting in the military, entering apprenticeships, or taking jobs that will lead to living wages as a result of vocational training they received while in high school, I would be thrilled to see that data and satisfied that the $17,000 per pupil per year is being well spent by ACPS. But if more than half of TC Williams' graduating class will spend next year flipping burgers, cutting grass, playing video games while living in mom's basement, day laboring, raising kids on welfare, drug dealing, etc. then ACPS is failing miserably. ACPS leaders must start gathering data and reporting outcomes for the non-college bound graduates if they want to assure us (as they always do) that they are doing a great job considering their demographics challenges.
Anonymous wrote: We live in a wonderful, noisy democracy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, ACPS published it's class of 2016 "decision day" list of colleges and universities. Link below. 331 students headed to college. Since you mentioned UVA - 31 from the class of 2016 are headed there. TC students are also headed to Princeton, Stanford, Dartmouth, Cornell, Vanderbilt, Emory, UC Berkley. Lots going to other Virginia schools too (e.g., 50 to Va Tech, 16 to Radford).
http://www.acpsk12.org/news/?p=2666
This year's college list isn't really bad, but it's not anywhere near as good as any recent year's list. No Harvard, no Yale, no UPenn, no Chicago, no MIT, not one single service academy (right near the Pentagon -- NONE? No West Point or Annapolis or Colo Springs or New London or King's Point -- not even one kid?), no Duke, etc etc. Only one each for Cornell, Stanford, Emory, and so forth. Colleges that picked up one or two TC seniors every year seem to have moved to zero. This is a very, truly bad result for TC this year. Not a confidence-builder for any parent that looks carefully at the list and compares it to the list for any recent year. One reason might be the SAT performance -- 2d lowest scores in the last decade. The school board had better be ready to deliver an explanation to the parents and voters, because performance has really plummeted, in just one year.
ACPS must focus on academics above all. The Capital Improvement Plan over the next 15 years on new ACPS builds should reflect this focus with school basics, not all the fluff. Buildings don't educate, teachers and a organized admin do. Get rid of ACPS entrenchment and get on with ACPS academic improvement.
Huh? Capital improvement and a focus on academics are not mutually exclusive. We need space for kids, which means we need buildings. And we need improvements to existing spaces that are well past need for repairs. As a student or teacher or administrator, how can you "focus on academics" if your classroom is a closet or your school is closed because of HVAC issues or flooding? Having adequate in which to teach and learn is important to academic success. Learning environment matters.
The college list seems fine to me. As someone posted above, these the schools chosen on decision day - it gives you no insight as to where students were accepted and chose not to go (or what schools they applied to for that matter). It also tells you nothing about where any given TC student in the future might apply and be accepted. And by the way, going private doesn't guarantee admission to any of the schools you list either - just my friends who spent 40K a year on private school whose kid is headed to VA Tech with 50 kids from TC.
1. It most certainly does tell you where the kids got in. No one, not one TC student, got into Yale and turned it down for NoVa. Not one. Top colleges typically meet financial need, or come very close. Going to a top college is no more net-expensive than going to Longwood.
2. The kid at a higher-ranked private that winds up at VT is in the lower portion of the class. A TC kid that is lucky enough to get into VT is in the top 15%. Completely different target-ranges.
TC is just lost on college admissions. They cater to the appearance of serving the absolute bottom cohort.
It is just weird how many anti-ACPS haters there on this forum. Truly bizarre. I do not understand why someone takes the time to loathe something in an online forum unless they have direct personal experience, which is almost never the case. Is it the same people?
In 2014, 62% went to a 4-year college and 25% went to a 2-year with 2% going to trade school, which I think is great considering the demographics of the student body. 89% of the students are furthering their education post-graduation and most are going to 4-year college. Like a PP said, NOVA is a great inexpensive option for families. Of those going to four-year, many are going to VA public universities, which is also not surprising given the demographics of the school.
http://www.acps.k12.va.us/news2014/nr2014061602.php
This is what I found in a quick search--there is maybe other, more recent numbers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does every post about ACPS end result in such nasty, bitter comments? It is exhausting.
The schools are far from perfect, but my children have had good experiences in their years in ACPS.
They are both at TC now, and I fully expect them to be able to do whatever they want to do when they graduate. They might not be able to get into particular colleges because of grades or selectivity or the arbitrariness of the application process; we may not be able to afford a particular college because we fall in the gray area of not qualifying for financial aid, but not being able to write a big check easily; but in the end, I think they will be well positioned to do whatever they want to do. They have good teachers, challenging classes, and interesting extracurricular activities.
Agreed! It is exhausting. No school is perfect - private or public. I send my kids to ACPS and I'm shocked by the rude comments made to myself and my kids regarding their schools from people who do not send their kids to ACPS. It is appalling. I wish people would just respect each other's decisions. I have a feeling conversations turn nasty due to insecurities and people feeling they need to justify their choices.
Anonymous wrote:As an ACPS parent, I try to be supportive, but I'm sick of the school leaders trying to blow smoke up the community's arse.
The press releases claims 331 students from TC Williams are college bound, then offers a list that purports to show where kids will be going to college. Add up all those numbers and it would total +770 kids...
Either the 331 number is wrong, or this list shows college acceptances, not college attendance. Which would mean that a small number of impressive kids are being counted multiple times for every place where they were accepted.
VDOE's data from Fall showed a senior class of 753 at TC Williams. If only 331 of those seniors are going on to pursue any post-HS education at either a 2 or 4 year college, then TC Williams deserves every bit of its poor reputation. What about the other 422 seniors? Dropouts? Flipping burgers next year?
I am ashamed at the poor results my school district achieves, despite the ridiculously high levels of spending. Yet all our leadership seems to care about is tearing down school buildings to build shiny brand new ones, without addressing the continuing failures to actually educate kids.