Anonymous wrote:The more I think about it, nominating an asian or indian-american doesn't really have the same political impact as nominating a black or latino.
Ideally you would nominate a latina for maximum political backlash when the R's bork it.
Borking an asian-american just doesn't have the same impact for ginning up voters.
Anonymous wrote:As an Indian-American man, it would be great to see Sri Srinivasan get the gig, but honestly it should be a woman.
6-3 male-female balance is not acceptable.
PaleoConPrep wrote:Anonymous wrote:PaleoConPrep wrote:Obama will not appoint Scalias replacement. I can assure you 100% that the Republican Senate will not let it happen. The replacement will depend on who wins POTUS. I vote for Roy Moore. He would make a fine justice.
Alabama and the Ten Commandments. Yeah, he'd be perfect.
What's wrong with Alabama and the 10 Commandments? The people will ultimately decide. Everything depends on the election.If Trump or Cruz are elected President, I think Moore has a good shot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sri srinivasan
I think he would be a good choice. He has a decent chance of getting confirmed without too much circus and poop flinging.
I'm sure in some ways he's too liberal for my preference, but all in all, he seems to be a sane and rational person that would be representative of our country which (IMO) is relatively moderate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sri srinivasan
I think he would be a good choice. He has a decent chance of getting confirmed without too much circus and poop flinging.
I'm sure in some ways he's too liberal for my preference, but all in all, he seems to be a sane and rational person that would be representative of our country which (IMO) is relatively moderate.
When people actually vote, it is demonstrated that ours is a center left country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sri srinivasan
I think he would be a good choice. He has a decent chance of getting confirmed without too much circus and poop flinging.
I'm sure in some ways he's too liberal for my preference, but all in all, he seems to be a sane and rational person that would be representative of our country which (IMO) is relatively moderate.
Anonymous wrote:Sri srinivasan
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Republicans will stall and delay and wait until a Republican gets into office and then will put someone like Phil Robertson in the Supreme Court.
Clown post, bro.
Truth hurts, bruh.
Fact is, the Republicans have stacked every major Committee Assignment with wackjobs like Phil Robertson. I mean, just look at Jim Inhofe, chairing the Energy and Environment Committee... Wat Da Fuq. No, he doesn't have the beard, but without a doubt, he's even more of a wackjob than the Robertsons. And there are plenty more examples I could throw at ya.