Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they would ban teenage boys from the rally, I might be more inclined to listen. They are the 100% cause of the need for abortions.

No, boys/men are 50% of the cause, and girls/women are the other 50%.

Nope. Two women having sex results in 0 abortions. Teenage boys are the least likely people to use condoms properly and often.

Teenage boys AND girls.

50% of the responsibility lies with the girls.

If girls are equally free to choose to have sex then they are equally responsible for preventing pregnancy and STDs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What ruthless employer wouldn't allow time to grieve after the death of a loved one? Is that even legal? It shouldn't be.

You get your regular 6 or 8 weeks of STD medical leave if your company provides it. You don't get 12-16 weeks.

12:44 believes her friend was forced to "quickly" return to her job after the death of her child.

Did that mother regret not aborting that child, 12:44? If there had been an abortion, then she would have to live with the torment of wondering, what if... We gave that baby a chance to live as long as possible?

Just because we can terminate a life, doesn't mean we should.

Im not that poster but I terminated a fetus with a birth defect and would do it again. A fetus /embryo is not a baby.

Please feel free to call that life whatever makes you happy. That's all that matters, no?

What makes me happy is that my doctor and I can talk about health issues and quality of life. About pain and torment before death and make a judgment about the quality of life. About the pain and suffering a fetus would experience by just being born. Then my doctor and I can have access to legal options in the United States to assure that that suffering did not occur. Thats what matters to me, not prolonging torture but, thats all that matters to you-life at any cost.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What ruthless employer wouldn't allow time to grieve after the death of a loved one? Is that even legal? It shouldn't be.

You get your regular 6 or 8 weeks of STD medical leave if your company provides it. You don't get 12-16 weeks.

12:44 believes her friend was forced to "quickly" return to her job after the death of her child.

Did that mother regret not aborting that child, 12:44? If there had been an abortion, then she would have to live with the torment of wondering, what if... We gave that baby a chance to live as long as possible?

Just because we can terminate a life, doesn't mean we should.

Im not that poster but I terminated a fetus with a birth defect and would do it again. A fetus /embryo is not a baby.

Please feel free to call that life whatever makes you happy. That's all that matters, no?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Instead of marching your self righteousness, how about all you people put word to action and spend the day providing free childcare to single moms? Or driving them to their jobs? Or make them a healthy, home-cooked meal? Or cleanup/revitalize their playgrounds and neighborhoods?

That's something that will actually help women and children during those hours, unlike a parade of selfish pride.

Your suggestion will not only fall on deaf ears, but actually serve to foster more vitriol because you're making it seem like irresponsible single, poor women are having abortions simply because they can't handle a baby.

Instead, suggest that the marchers pitch in and help care for the babies who would be born with genetic conditions incompatible with life. Suggest they visit the nicu while the baby is hooked up to machines for a few hours, days or weeks before passing away. Better yet, suggest they pay for the costly medical bills of months of prenatal care (for a baby who won't live) and the much costlier delivery and nicu charges (for a baby who won't live).

+100000

Maybe they can also spend their time fundraising for funeral costs of those poor babies who are incompatible with life, as well as the psychological services their parents might need after bringing a child into the world only to see her suffer and die.

What if you have to suffer and die? Should your mother have aborted you?

Not that poster, but personally, I would much prefer to have been aborted than to have been born a quadriplegic or locked in the hellish prison of low-functioning autism. Or into a household rife with child sexual abuse or torture. Or many other scenarios I can think of. I wouldn't bring a baby into the world if I lived in Syria right now.

Some people think poor or dumb folks shouldn't be allowed to reproduce.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What ruthless employer wouldn't allow time to grieve after the death of a loved one? Is that even legal? It shouldn't be.

You get your regular 6 or 8 weeks of STD medical leave if your company provides it. You don't get 12-16 weeks.

12:44 believes her friend was forced to "quickly" return to her job after the death of her child.

Did that mother regret not aborting that child, 12:44? If there had been an abortion, then she would have to live with the torment of wondering, what if... We gave that baby a chance to live as long as possible?

Just because we can terminate a life, doesn't mean we should.

Im not that poster but I terminated a fetus with a birth defect and would do it again. A fetus /embryo is not a baby.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What ruthless employer wouldn't allow time to grieve after the death of a loved one? Is that even legal? It shouldn't be.

You get your regular 6 or 8 weeks of STD medical leave if your company provides it. You don't get 12-16 weeks.

12:44 believes her friend was forced to "quickly" return to her job after the death of her child.

Did that mother regret not aborting that child, 12:44? If there had been an abortion, then she would have to live with the torment of wondering, what if... We gave that baby a chance to live as long as possible?

Just because we can terminate a life, doesn't mean we should.

Guess what, asshat? 6 weeks isn't enough to grieve and get over it.

My friend opted to carry to term because there was another baby (twins).

Im glad she had the option to choose to carry or to abort. That's a very personal choice. Every woman has the right to choose, and that's the right approach given that every medical situation is different and every individual has their own opinion and limitations.

Have you, pro birthers, thought about this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Instead of marching your self righteousness, how about all you people put word to action and spend the day providing free childcare to single moms? Or driving them to their jobs? Or make them a healthy, home-cooked meal? Or cleanup/revitalize their playgrounds and neighborhoods?

That's something that will actually help women and children during those hours, unlike a parade of selfish pride.

Your suggestion will not only fall on deaf ears, but actually serve to foster more vitriol because you're making it seem like irresponsible single, poor women are having abortions simply because they can't handle a baby.

Instead, suggest that the marchers pitch in and help care for the babies who would be born with genetic conditions incompatible with life. Suggest they visit the nicu while the baby is hooked up to machines for a few hours, days or weeks before passing away. Better yet, suggest they pay for the costly medical bills of months of prenatal care (for a baby who won't live) and the much costlier delivery and nicu charges (for a baby who won't live).

+100000

Maybe they can also spend their time fundraising for funeral costs of those poor babies who are incompatible with life, as well as the psychological services their parents might need after bringing a child into the world only to see her suffer and die.

What if you have to suffer and die? Should your mother have aborted you?

Not that poster, but personally, I would much prefer to have been aborted than to have been born a quadriplegic or locked in the hellish prison of low-functioning autism. Or into a household rife with child sexual abuse or torture. Or many other scenarios I can think of. I wouldn't bring a baby into the world if I lived in Syria right now.

Some people think poor or dumb folks shouldn't be allowed to reproduce.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What ruthless employer wouldn't allow time to grieve after the death of a loved one? Is that even legal? It shouldn't be.

You get your regular 6 or 8 weeks of STD medical leave if your company provides it. You don't get 12-16 weeks.

12:44 believes her friend was forced to "quickly" return to her job after the death of her child.

Did that mother regret not aborting that child, 12:44? If there had been an abortion, then she would have to live with the torment of wondering, what if... We gave that baby a chance to live as long as possible?

Just because we can terminate a life, doesn't mean we should.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Instead of marching your self righteousness, how about all you people put word to action and spend the day providing free childcare to single moms? Or driving them to their jobs? Or make them a healthy, home-cooked meal? Or cleanup/revitalize their playgrounds and neighborhoods?

That's something that will actually help women and children during those hours, unlike a parade of selfish pride.

Your suggestion will not only fall on deaf ears, but actually serve to foster more vitriol because you're making it seem like irresponsible single, poor women are having abortions simply because they can't handle a baby.

Instead, suggest that the marchers pitch in and help care for the babies who would be born with genetic conditions incompatible with life. Suggest they visit the nicu while the baby is hooked up to machines for a few hours, days or weeks before passing away. Better yet, suggest they pay for the costly medical bills of months of prenatal care (for a baby who won't live) and the much costlier delivery and nicu charges (for a baby who won't live).

+100000

Maybe they can also spend their time fundraising for funeral costs of those poor babies who are incompatible with life, as well as the psychological services their parents might need after bringing a child into the world only to see her suffer and die.

What if you have to suffer and die? Should your mother have aborted you?

Not that poster, but personally, I would much prefer to have been aborted than to have been born a quadriplegic or locked in the hellish prison of low-functioning autism. Or into a household rife with child sexual abuse or torture. Or many other scenarios I can think of. I wouldn't bring a baby into the world if I lived in Syria right now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What ruthless employer wouldn't allow time to grieve after the death of a loved one? Is that even legal? It shouldn't be.

You get your regular 6 or 8 weeks of STD medical leave if your company provides it. You don't get 12-16 weeks.

12:44 believes her friend was forced to "quickly" return to her job after the death of her child.

Did that mother regret not aborting that child, 12:44? If there had been an abortion, then she would have to live with the torment of wondering, what if... We gave that baby a chance to live as long as possible?

Just because we can terminate a life, doesn't mean we should.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, do you believe abortion is acceptable if the mothers life is in serious danger?

If so, then yes even you believe that the mother's rights supersede the unborn.

This is a bad argument. Most people recognize that extraordinary measures are acceptable if a person's life is in serious danger. For example, they may shoot someone if you believe they are putting your live in serious danger, but not if your life isn't in danger. If someone thinks you may shoot another person if your life is in serious danger, it does not mean that person thinks you can go around shooting people at other times.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they would ban teenage boys from the rally, I might be more inclined to listen. They are the 100% cause of the need for abortions.

No, boys/men are 50% of the cause, and girls/women are the other 50%.

Nope. Two women having sex results in 0 abortions. Teenage boys are the least likely people to use condoms properly and often.

Teenage boys AND girls.

50% of the responsibility lies with the girls.

If girls are equally free to choose to have sex then they are equally responsible for preventing pregnancy and STDs.

Sorry but male contraception (condom) is the only truely effective was to stop transmission of STDs. Does not matter which partner has the STD, the penis needs covering. Men are more responsible for sheathing their organ.