Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, at least they seem to be quick on the trigger in communication.
Firing off emails, left and right!
They probably could have included a few more bullet points.
Probably under the gun to get this out ASAP.
Come on, guys, don't shoot the messenger.
I think this news release had DCUM in it's crosshairs.
These are awesome![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, fuck this Shepherd Park cachement to Wilson. I am not sending my kid to a school with metal detectors.
WTF does that mean?
You won't be missed. BYE!
+1. Please tell me you were joking. Current Wilson kids come from all parts of DC including Mt Pleasant, Crestwood, SW and others that are not your lily white kids. Most shepherd Park kids go private/Jewish schools. You have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.
+1. Unless this PP knows something the rest of us don't, I would be very, very surprised if it was a kid from Shepherd Park.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if it was a real gun. Those airsoft pellet guns look pretty realistic. That's what got the kid in Cleveland shot.
Shouldn't the metal detector operator still have stopped that, if it was that?
If you have ever seen the morning stream of kids, I am not surprised something got through. There is a lot happening in a very short time.
Anonymous wrote:I spoke with a police officer the other day, pointing out a student throwing rocks at passersby on Wisconsin after school. I have heard repeatedly on this thread that police are asked by the school to 'go soft' on such nonsense..is this true? The problem.ia that if you don't draw the line somewhere and intervene as responsible adults, then kids do escalate. Whether the weapons are brought to hurt someone or as protection from being hurt - that should not happen twice in a week. Speaks to the school being run by student giving in to their worst instincts, rather than adults leading them to their Hughes expectations. This needs to be addressed in partnership with community and police; Wilson is not a silo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC knows the young man who had the gun, says he's smart and funny but been very withdrawn this year. I am glad the gun was reported, and no one was hurt. I hope the youngster gets the help he needs, someplace other than Wilson
Very disturbing. Kid needs help and expulsion.
Perhaps suspension would be more appropriate. "Help" and expulsion seem like contrary approaches.
You've introduced something of a hollow point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The poster arguing that expulsion is too harsh - what are your thoughts on what message it sends to the other students if bringing a gun to class doesn't even warrant the harshest penalty? Also, what are your thoughts on how such a situation would impact the work environment/ability to attract and retain teachers? I'm going to assume not many teachers look to work in a place where bringing guns to school is tolerated. There is part of me that understands where you're coming from, but I also think the picture is much bigger than just one student.
I'm not saying expulsion is too harsh. I'm saying that automatically expelling the child without any knowledge of the circumstances is poor judgement. I prefer to have all the facts at hand before rendering a decision.
Obviously, we differ in our approach to problem-solving.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, at least they seem to be quick on the trigger in communication.
Firing off emails, left and right!
They probably could have included a few more bullet points.
Probably under the gun to get this out ASAP.
Come on, guys, don't shoot the messenger.
I think this news release had DCUM in it's crosshairs.
Anonymous wrote:The poster arguing that expulsion is too harsh - what are your thoughts on what message it sends to the other students if bringing a gun to class doesn't even warrant the harshest penalty? Also, what are your thoughts on how such a situation would impact the work environment/ability to attract and retain teachers? I'm going to assume not many teachers look to work in a place where bringing guns to school is tolerated. There is part of me that understands where you're coming from, but I also think the picture is much bigger than just one student.
Anonymous wrote:The poster arguing that expulsion is too harsh - what are your thoughts on what message it sends to the other students if bringing a gun to class doesn't even warrant the harshest penalty? Also, what are your thoughts on how such a situation would impact the work environment/ability to attract and retain teachers? I'm going to assume not many teachers look to work in a place where bringing guns to school is tolerated. There is part of me that understands where you're coming from, but I also think the picture is much bigger than just one student.