Anonymous wrote:thats actually a myth.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes cultural appropriation is bad. So just to satisfy the liberal morons, you'll have to stop eating chinese food unless you're chinese. No spaghetti for you unless you're italian.
The italians appropriated the noodles from the Chinese.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The institution of slavery was a cultural practice. What do you think "culture" is? Musical compositions and architectural designs only. Every culture in human history has had some form of slavery with attendant beliefs, values, practices, and social frameworks. So, yes, the institution of slavery was cultural and continues to inform US culture.
Slavery as it existed during the period of European colonialism in the 1600s-1800s was appropriated from African culture. Yes, Europeans took advantage of it and expanded on it, but they didn't invent it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. I was raised that the U.S. is a cultural melting pot, and that that's a good thing. Art, language, music, dance, and food all get better when influenced by other cultures. I can see the point of some cultural appropriation arguments -- for example, the demeaning "noble savage" view of Indians -- when the use is racist and causes real harm to how the target culture is treated, but a name does not belong to a particular culture, and especially if the name is of an admired artist.
I'd find a kid named Geronimo or Pocahontas odd regardless of the parents' background, but that's just because I haven't heard it very often. If I met a child named Running Horse, I might suspect the parents were a little loopy or trying too hard without some sort of Indian connection, but that's only what I think now. I thought the same thing the first time I ran into some of the old man/lady names that are very popular now.
I'm one of the AA moms above who doesn't care who uses what name. I also grew up with the melting pot analogy here in the US but I am glad that we have moved on more to the salad analogy. In a melting pot each individual ingredient is lost and everything becomes the same. In a salad each ingredient comes together to enhance and make the whole better, but each also still retains its individual nature.
Anonymous wrote:This is an offshoot of a thread that's currently in the "expectant moms" forum about the name Khalil. There's a small debate going on over there about white/european people using names of other cultures and whether or not this is ok or disrespectful. In this case the name is not just any Arabic name but is the name of a famous poet, Khalil Gibran. The child would be named after the poet but would not have any family or ethnic connection to the poet.
So I wanted to open up the discussion here, not specifically around the name Khalil but about naming children names that are from cultures that are not the parents' cultures. Is this cultural appropriation and/or is it "bad"?
I guess this isn't exactly "political" but I figured people looking at the "political" board might have interesting perspective about culture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree PPs that the cultural appropriation argument is silly. What if you name your child after a dear friend from another culture? That's not "cultural appropriation."
People making this argument don't understand cultural appropriation.
Cultural appropriation is not simply using something from another culture.That is cultural diffusion. It is a normal part of human interaction. My seventh graders are studying this. Things you can do without any "white guilt":
Use algebra.
Have a pinata at your 4 year old's birthday party.
Eat bagels and lox.
Wear snowshoes.
Name your newborn "Nzinga" after the famous 17th century Angolan queen who defied Portuguese slavers.
Cultural appropriation occurs when this borrowing is disrespectful. For example, "Columbusing": celebrating claims by a person of your ethnicity that her or she discovered something that people of another ethnic group have done for a long time. A good example of why this frustrates people of color is Miley Cyrus "twerking". My Chinese coworker says she finds it irritating when she sees whites and AAs with tattoos in Chinese characters and they can't tell her what the word or phrase is in Mandarin. Sometimes, they actually have a totally different concept inked on than they paid for.
Imagine the difference between
1. a coworker adopting a technique that you created and your boss acknowledges as your work
2. a coworker adopting a technique that you created and using it to get a raise or promotion because your boss won't acknowledge that it is your work.
Many minorities are frustrated because cultural appropriation is a continuation of unfair practices in place for centuries. Many patents awarded to whites in the antebellum era were actually the inventions of slaves and free people of color, but their intellectually property could not be legally or socially recognized.
This is all such bullshit. Please tell me that this isn't part of the 7th grade curriculum - that, instead, this is your way of "padding" the guide with crap.
Cultural misappropriation stems from ignorance - not knowing the difference between the spoken Mandarin and Cantonese and trying to impress your in-laws with the wrong version. It's not intentional.
And do you honestly think that anyone intelligent (from any race or culture) would consider twerking a "black invention" to be proud of? Furthermore, using the term "Columbusing" is both offensive and in this case, ironic.
Your other examples are plagiarism - intellectual theft. This is intentional. Stealing patents from slaves and free persons is still plagiarism, unless you're defining the institution of slavery as a culture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree PPs that the cultural appropriation argument is silly. What if you name your child after a dear friend from another culture? That's not "cultural appropriation."
People making this argument don't understand cultural appropriation.
Cultural appropriation is not simply using something from another culture.That is cultural diffusion. It is a normal part of human interaction. My seventh graders are studying this. Things you can do without any "white guilt":
Use algebra.
Have a pinata at your 4 year old's birthday party.
Eat bagels and lox.
Wear snowshoes.
Name your newborn "Nzinga" after the famous 17th century Angolan queen who defied Portuguese slavers.
Cultural appropriation occurs when this borrowing is disrespectful. For example, "Columbusing": celebrating claims by a person of your ethnicity that her or she discovered something that people of another ethnic group have done for a long time. A good example of why this frustrates people of color is Miley Cyrus "twerking". My Chinese coworker says she finds it irritating when she sees whites and AAs with tattoos in Chinese characters and they can't tell her what the word or phrase is in Mandarin. Sometimes, they actually have a totally different concept inked on than they paid for.
Imagine the difference between
1. a coworker adopting a technique that you created and your boss acknowledges as your work
2. a coworker adopting a technique that you created and using it to get a raise or promotion because your boss won't acknowledge that it is your work.
Many minorities are frustrated because cultural appropriation is a continuation of unfair practices in place for centuries. Many patents awarded to whites in the antebellum era were actually the inventions of slaves and free people of color, but their intellectually property could not be legally or socially recognized.