Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whenever somebody brings up Thor, Zeus, fairies, etc, I really can't decide if they are just extremely stupid or extremely rude. Do you really think modern religious belief is equivalent to believing in fairies? Do you really have such a very low opinion of us, and such a very high opinion of yourself? Do you just enjoy denigrating people? Or can you really not see there is a difference? When you typed those words, did you feel clever or cruel?
There is no difference between believing in Jesus and believing in Zeus. Absolutely none.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whenever somebody brings up Thor, Zeus, fairies, etc, I really can't decide if they are just extremely stupid or extremely rude. Do you really think modern religious belief is equivalent to believing in fairies? Do you really have such a very low opinion of us, and such a very high opinion of yourself? Do you just enjoy denigrating people? Or can you really not see there is a difference? When you typed those words, did you feel clever or cruel?
There is no difference between believing in Jesus and believing in Zeus. Absolutely none.
Anonymous wrote:Whenever somebody brings up Thor, Zeus, fairies, etc, I really can't decide if they are just extremely stupid or extremely rude. Do you really think modern religious belief is equivalent to believing in fairies? Do you really have such a very low opinion of us, and such a very high opinion of yourself? Do you just enjoy denigrating people? Or can you really not see there is a difference? When you typed those words, did you feel clever or cruel?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If scientific knowledge and philosophical inquiry reveal to you that you don't believe in a diety, lovely.
But if I showed the same I information to a believer and they continued to have faith, we couldn't say they had made a mistake or failed to understand the arguments.
That's what I mean by "proof." Maybe we are in agreement if I restate it like this?
I'll admit that I'm a bit lost in this conversation. In hopes of not confusing things more, I'll say that "information" doesn't necessarily have the same impact on people of faith (believing in some religion) and people without faith (atheists). Faith, from what I've seen, can happily co-exist with reason as well as outside of reason. Faith supersedes reason. I've seen very intelligent, well-educated people take great pride in the fact that their understanding of science, etc, does not interfere a bit with their ability to have faith in their religion. I've seen it here on DCUM and IRL
The definition of faith is belief without proof. You seem to not be keeping that in mind
Besides, what science harms faith? Unless you literally believe that God created the earth in 7 human days, there's no conflict. The conflicts between science and faith only come in the details, which a believer is often free to reject, or in reading the bible or other text literally, which many many don't.
(Still an atheist here)
It can also be belief despite proof or belief without taking "proof" or evidence into consideration -- because faith is the natural default for some people. There is no "proof" of God but there is plenty of evidence against certain religious beliefs. None of that matters to a person of deep faith.
There is also plenty of evidence FOR the existence of God. You just choose to ignore it!
Anonymous wrote:Whenever somebody brings up Thor, Zeus, fairies, etc, I really can't decide if they are just extremely stupid or extremely rude. Do you really think modern religious belief is equivalent to believing in fairies? Do you really have such a very low opinion of us, and such a very high opinion of yourself? Do you just enjoy denigrating people? Or can you really not see there is a difference? When you typed those words, did you feel clever or cruel?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whenever somebody brings up Thor, Zeus, fairies, etc, I really can't decide if they are just extremely stupid or extremely rude. Do you really think modern religious belief is equivalent to believing in fairies? Do you really have such a very low opinion of us, and such a very high opinion of yourself? Do you just enjoy denigrating people? Or can you really not see there is a difference? When you typed those words, did you feel clever or cruel?
I felt curious. I know there are differences, and also that they all have something important in common -- they are all supernatural and were once (or currently) believed in by many people . A major difference is that "God" is the supernatural being that most people believe in currently and even the the currently popular God is defined differently by different people. God has different traits and different demands depending on which religion he represents and sometime depending on an individual's perception.
There is nothing denigrating about mentioning Zeus or Thor or any other god, unless you think some ancient people were stupid to assume that there was a supernatural being looking over them, protecting them and having certain expectations of them. We can't prove there is no God and we can't prove that one is better than the other -- only that different people believed in them at different times.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Which God -- the one you believe in? Or other gods - Thor, Zeus, etc? What about other supernatural beings like fairies and angels and trolls (not the internet kind)? Is there evidence for those too.
Thor, Zeus, fairies, and Tolls are real, in the sense that they are man's early attempts to understand and express something that is real. Far from being ludicrous, they are beautiful, and that is why they still excite people's imaginations and souls to this day.
In medieval times, some people believed in both the Christian god and trolls and fairies. The trolls and fairies, were not part of Christianity, but it didn't stop people from believing in them -- and ghosts too and evil spirits.
Even today, children are encouraged to believe in some fairies (the tooth fairy, Santa's and his elves) until a certain age, after which they stop believing in them on their own, or are told by other children or their parents that they aren't real. Kids are usually encouraged to continue their belief in god, though.
Anonymous wrote:Our young kids are friends or classmates. You find out I am atheist because someone asks a question about faith and I answer honestly, not defensively, with no disrespect to the faithful.
You . . .
A) Don't care
B) Think slightly less of me
C) Not B really but are less likely to be friends with me
D) Think your kids shouldn't play with mine
E) Think it's weird I said it even though I didn't bring it up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Which God -- the one you believe in? Or other gods - Thor, Zeus, etc? What about other supernatural beings like fairies and angels and trolls (not the internet kind)? Is there evidence for those too.
Thor, Zeus, fairies, and Tolls are real, in the sense that they are man's early attempts to understand and express something that is real. Far from being ludicrous, they are beautiful, and that is why they still excite people's imaginations and souls to this day.
Anonymous wrote:Whenever somebody brings up Thor, Zeus, fairies, etc, I really can't decide if they are just extremely stupid or extremely rude. Do you really think modern religious belief is equivalent to believing in fairies? Do you really have such a very low opinion of us, and such a very high opinion of yourself? Do you just enjoy denigrating people? Or can you really not see there is a difference? When you typed those words, did you feel clever or cruel?
Anonymous wrote:
Which God -- the one you believe in? Or other gods - Thor, Zeus, etc? What about other supernatural beings like fairies and angels and trolls (not the internet kind)? Is there evidence for those too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If scientific knowledge and philosophical inquiry reveal to you that you don't believe in a diety, lovely.
But if I showed the same I information to a believer and they continued to have faith, we couldn't say they had made a mistake or failed to understand the arguments.
That's what I mean by "proof." Maybe we are in agreement if I restate it like this?
I'll admit that I'm a bit lost in this conversation. In hopes of not confusing things more, I'll say that "information" doesn't necessarily have the same impact on people of faith (believing in some religion) and people without faith (atheists). Faith, from what I've seen, can happily co-exist with reason as well as outside of reason. Faith supersedes reason. I've seen very intelligent, well-educated people take great pride in the fact that their understanding of science, etc, does not interfere a bit with their ability to have faith in their religion. I've seen it here on DCUM and IRL
The definition of faith is belief without proof. You seem to not be keeping that in mind
Besides, what science harms faith? Unless you literally believe that God created the earth in 7 human days, there's no conflict. The conflicts between science and faith only come in the details, which a believer is often free to reject, or in reading the bible or other text literally, which many many don't.
(Still an atheist here)
It can also be belief despite proof or belief without taking "proof" or evidence into consideration -- because faith is the natural default for some people. There is no "proof" of God but there is plenty of evidence against certain religious beliefs. None of that matters to a person of deep faith.
There is also plenty of evidence FOR the existence of God. You just choose to ignore it!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If scientific knowledge and philosophical inquiry reveal to you that you don't believe in a diety, lovely.
But if I showed the same I information to a believer and they continued to have faith, we couldn't say they had made a mistake or failed to understand the arguments.
That's what I mean by "proof." Maybe we are in agreement if I restate it like this?
I'll admit that I'm a bit lost in this conversation. In hopes of not confusing things more, I'll say that "information" doesn't necessarily have the same impact on people of faith (believing in some religion) and people without faith (atheists). Faith, from what I've seen, can happily co-exist with reason as well as outside of reason. Faith supersedes reason. I've seen very intelligent, well-educated people take great pride in the fact that their understanding of science, etc, does not interfere a bit with their ability to have faith in their religion. I've seen it here on DCUM and IRL
The definition of faith is belief without proof. You seem to not be keeping that in mind
Besides, what science harms faith? Unless you literally believe that God created the earth in 7 human days, there's no conflict. The conflicts between science and faith only come in the details, which a believer is often free to reject, or in reading the bible or other text literally, which many many don't.
(Still an atheist here)
It can also be belief despite proof or belief without taking "proof" or evidence into consideration -- because faith is the natural default for some people. There is no "proof" of God but there is plenty of evidence against certain religious beliefs. None of that matters to a person of deep faith.