Anonymous wrote:
A no doesn't always have to be verbal either.
But I didn't get married just for sex on demand, but I also see a spouse as more than a blow up doll.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If someone marries me, I presume they like having sex with me. If they say no, obviously I will stop. But if they say nothing at all and don't push me away then I assume it's okay.
It's ridiculous that suggesting that someone speaks up and let's their thoughts known is victim blaming. Some people just want to be victims, I guess, without putting in any work to change the world around them.
Exactly this! Unless I specifically say "no" in my marriage, it means yes.
That's kind of fucked up. Unless you're just saying you're normally game for it.
Um, yea. Why wouldn't I normally be up for it? Isn't that the point of being married and sharing an intimate life as opposed to having to start from square one and getting explicit consent every time? No always means no, but silence means different things depending on the context. Of course so many of you are in sexless marriages and otherwise screwed up situations...
2 entirely different issues: (1) If folks are normally up for sex in a marriage, and (2) if it's OK to presume 'yes' in a marriage. #2 is the problem. It's OK to assume you'll get the yes, it's never OK to assume you already have it.
Wait, so you want me to be faithful, but I can't presume that you'll consent to sex? Hahahahaha. Please. If we are married, I assume you are fine with me touching you, end of story. I won't push if you say no, but if you want me to woo you every time to get to yes... Lol I'd rather be with some young thing that wants me.
Not PP, but why not?
A no doesn't always have to be verbal either.
But I didn't get married just for sex on demand, but I also see a spouse as more than a blow up doll.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have any of you ever "woken up" your boyfriends/husbands with a surprise BJ?
Millions of women have. Does that make them rapists?
Yes, as long as you think what the husband did is rape.
Anonymous wrote:Have any of you ever "woken up" your boyfriends/husbands with a surprise BJ?
Millions of women have. Does that make them rapists?
Anonymous wrote:Have any of you ever "woken up" your boyfriends/husbands with a surprise BJ?
Millions of women have. Does that make them rapists?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If someone marries me, I presume they like having sex with me. If they say no, obviously I will stop. But if they say nothing at all and don't push me away then I assume it's okay.
It's ridiculous that suggesting that someone speaks up and let's their thoughts known is victim blaming. Some people just want to be victims, I guess, without putting in any work to change the world around them.
Exactly this! Unless I specifically say "no" in my marriage, it means yes.
That's kind of fucked up. Unless you're just saying you're normally game for it.
Um, yea. Why wouldn't I normally be up for it? Isn't that the point of being married and sharing an intimate life as opposed to having to start from square one and getting explicit consent every time? No always means no, but silence means different things depending on the context. Of course so many of you are in sexless marriages and otherwise screwed up situations...
2 entirely different issues: (1) If folks are normally up for sex in a marriage, and (2) if it's OK to presume 'yes' in a marriage. #2 is the problem. It's OK to assume you'll get the yes, it's never OK to assume you already have it.
Wait, so you want me to be faithful, but I can't presume that you'll consent to sex? Hahahahaha. Please. If we are married, I assume you are fine with me touching you, end of story. I won't push if you say no, but if you want me to woo you every time to get to yes... Lol I'd rather be with some young thing that wants me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If someone marries me, I presume they like having sex with me. If they say no, obviously I will stop. But if they say nothing at all and don't push me away then I assume it's okay.
It's ridiculous that suggesting that someone speaks up and let's their thoughts known is victim blaming. Some people just want to be victims, I guess, without putting in any work to change the world around them.
Exactly this! Unless I specifically say "no" in my marriage, it means yes.
That's kind of fucked up. Unless you're just saying you're normally game for it.
Um, yea. Why wouldn't I normally be up for it? Isn't that the point of being married and sharing an intimate life as opposed to having to start from square one and getting explicit consent every time? No always means no, but silence means different things depending on the context. Of course so many of you are in sexless marriages and otherwise screwed up situations...
2 entirely different issues: (1) If folks are normally up for sex in a marriage, and (2) if it's OK to presume 'yes' in a marriage. #2 is the problem. It's OK to assume you'll get the yes, it's never OK to assume you already have it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If someone marries me, I presume they like having sex with me. If they say no, obviously I will stop. But if they say nothing at all and don't push me away then I assume it's okay.
It's ridiculous that suggesting that someone speaks up and let's their thoughts known is victim blaming. Some people just want to be victims, I guess, without putting in any work to change the world around them.
Exactly this! Unless I specifically say "no" in my marriage, it means yes.
That's kind of fucked up. Unless you're just saying you're normally game for it.
Um, yea. Why wouldn't I normally be up for it? Isn't that the point of being married and sharing an intimate life as opposed to having to start from square one and getting explicit consent every time? No always means no, but silence means different things depending on the context. Of course so many of you are in sexless marriages and otherwise screwed up situations...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here, haven't had a chance to look at this thread since yesterday and wow. The discourse is surprising and interesting. I spoke with a therapist today who was very helpful. Thanks to those who have shared helpful contributions. I will catch up on reading now.
You spoke to a therapist about a friend's problems!???? Do you have too much time on your hands? Too much money to burn on therapists??
Clearly...but we knew that already when she came to DCUM to discuss her friends sex life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here, haven't had a chance to look at this thread since yesterday and wow. The discourse is surprising and interesting. I spoke with a therapist today who was very helpful. Thanks to those who have shared helpful contributions. I will catch up on reading now.
You spoke to a therapist about a friend's problems!???? Do you have too much time on your hands? Too much money to burn on therapists??
Anonymous wrote:OP here, haven't had a chance to look at this thread since yesterday and wow. The discourse is surprising and interesting. I spoke with a therapist today who was very helpful. Thanks to those who have shared helpful contributions. I will catch up on reading now.