Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My newly separated friend went on a date with a guy at 7:30pm. They met at the bar of a restaurant. Both my friend and her date were obviously hungry as they finished all the bread on the table. Date did not offer any food. Friend went home starving. It's been a while since I've been married for 10 years but most of my dates were for dinner or we'd meet up at a bar/club but it was after dinner time and usually with other people.
Is this guy just not into my friend? Cheap? Poor? Or is this normal to have just drinks?
I think it is fine to go out for drinks but if you meet at 7:30 and clearly both people are hungry, shouldn't you just order food?
Tell your newly separated friend she can order the god damn food if she's hungry. Nothing is stopping her from doing this, other than the preconceived notion that women entitled to a dating gravy train where men pay for everything.
This is why I say to women when setting up dates:
ME: What time are you eating dinner?
HER: Uh, 7 pm?
ME: Great! See you at the bar at 8:30!
Not to be a bitch but I would cancel on someone who did that. It's kind of a weasely, passive aggressive way of doing it. Red flag.
PP weasel - not for nothing but there's a reason you're still single. Ha. I'd never meet you at the bar at 8:30 if that's your opener. Thankfully, I've been happily married for 15yrs to a man who paid for EVERYtHiNG for our firmest two years of dating. Guess what, 15yrs in he still treats me well. I work and make a good amount of money myself, but it's nice to have a DH who treats me well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My newly separated friend went on a date with a guy at 7:30pm. They met at the bar of a restaurant. Both my friend and her date were obviously hungry as they finished all the bread on the table. Date did not offer any food. Friend went home starving. It's been a while since I've been married for 10 years but most of my dates were for dinner or we'd meet up at a bar/club but it was after dinner time and usually with other people.
Is this guy just not into my friend? Cheap? Poor? Or is this normal to have just drinks?
I think it is fine to go out for drinks but if you meet at 7:30 and clearly both people are hungry, shouldn't you just order food?
Tell your newly separated friend she can order the god damn food if she's hungry. Nothing is stopping her from doing this, other than the preconceived notion that women entitled to a dating gravy train where men pay for everything.
This is why I say to women when setting up dates:
ME: What time are you eating dinner?
HER: Uh, 7 pm?
ME: Great! See you at the bar at 8:30!
PP weasel - not for nothing but there's a reason you're still single. Ha. I'd never meet you at the bar at 8:30 if that's your opener. Thankfully, I've been happily married for 15yrs to a man who paid for EVERYtHiNG for our firmest two years of dating. Guess what, 15yrs in he still treats me well. I work and make a good amount of money myself, but it's nice to have a DH who treats me well.
Not to be a bitch but I would cancel on someone who did that. It's kind of a weasely, passive aggressive way of doing it. Red flag.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My newly separated friend went on a date with a guy at 7:30pm. They met at the bar of a restaurant. Both my friend and her date were obviously hungry as they finished all the bread on the table. Date did not offer any food. Friend went home starving. It's been a while since I've been married for 10 years but most of my dates were for dinner or we'd meet up at a bar/club but it was after dinner time and usually with other people.
Is this guy just not into my friend? Cheap? Poor? Or is this normal to have just drinks?
I think it is fine to go out for drinks but if you meet at 7:30 and clearly both people are hungry, shouldn't you just order food?
Tell your newly separated friend she can order the god damn food if she's hungry. Nothing is stopping her from doing this, other than the preconceived notion that women entitled to a dating gravy train where men pay for everything.
This is why I say to women when setting up dates:
ME: What time are you eating dinner?
HER: Uh, 7 pm?
ME: Great! See you at the bar at 8:30!
Not to be a bitch but I would cancel on someone who did that. It's kind of a weasely, passive aggressive way of doing it. Red flag.
+1. Sounds soooooo awkward! Like you are socially inept, maybe Aspergerish.
Anonymous wrote:meeting for coffee is a good idea too, take it slow!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have nothing to really offer because I have never dated, and I just find these threads fascinating and illuminating.
But if I were dating, I would not want the guy to pay for a first date; I wouldn't want him to think I owed him anything.
And drinks would be best. i don't want to sit through a first date trying to talk and shovel food in my mouth.
Maybe that's because I am an old married and I am used pigging out around the spouse!
Dear Anna Duggar, You should get out there and try dating. It's not as bad as DCUM makes it sound, and it's much better than what you have now!
I am okay, thanks. I met my husband almost thirty years ago while we were in high school, and things seemed to have worked out. If you can believe it, I have advanced degrees, a career, one child, and a f--- ton of fun. I have just never dated. Sue me. But I do believe my opinion may be less informed than those in the scene.
You dated your husband, pre-marriage, that counts.
You're right. But I was 14 and our dates were limited to his mom driving us to a movie, make out sessions in my basement, homecomings, and group date/hangs at the all night diner.
But I do have enough friends who have dated as adults, and none of them liked the man to pay on the first date. It is split on whether they want to sit through an entire meal. Some find it relaxing, others who have had stinker dates have describe d long meals as tortuous. YMMV.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My newly separated friend went on a date with a guy at 7:30pm. They met at the bar of a restaurant. Both my friend and her date were obviously hungry as they finished all the bread on the table. Date did not offer any food. Friend went home starving. It's been a while since I've been married for 10 years but most of my dates were for dinner or we'd meet up at a bar/club but it was after dinner time and usually with other people.
Is this guy just not into my friend? Cheap? Poor? Or is this normal to have just drinks?
I think it is fine to go out for drinks but if you meet at 7:30 and clearly both people are hungry, shouldn't you just order food?
Tell your newly separated friend she can order the god damn food if she's hungry. Nothing is stopping her from doing this, other than the preconceived notion that women entitled to a dating gravy train where men pay for everything.
This is why I say to women when setting up dates:
ME: What time are you eating dinner?
HER: Uh, 7 pm?
ME: Great! See you at the bar at 8:30!
Not to be a bitch but I would cancel on someone who did that. It's kind of a weasely, passive aggressive way of doing it. Red flag.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would assume a first date invitation at 7:30 means eat dinner first.
I would assume it is dinner included. Who eats before going out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My newly separated friend went on a date with a guy at 7:30pm. They met at the bar of a restaurant. Both my friend and her date were obviously hungry as they finished all the bread on the table. Date did not offer any food. Friend went home starving. It's been a while since I've been married for 10 years but most of my dates were for dinner or we'd meet up at a bar/club but it was after dinner time and usually with other people.
Is this guy just not into my friend? Cheap? Poor? Or is this normal to have just drinks?
I think it is fine to go out for drinks but if you meet at 7:30 and clearly both people are hungry, shouldn't you just order food?
Tell your newly separated friend she can order the god damn food if she's hungry. Nothing is stopping her from doing this, other than the preconceived notion that women entitled to a dating gravy train where men pay for everything.
This is why I say to women when setting up dates:
ME: What time are you eating dinner?
HER: Uh, 7 pm?
ME: Great! See you at the bar at 8:30!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friend told me that this guy asked her out to dinner, picked the place, and then at the end he asked her to split the bill.
She of course paid without comment, was polite and fine about it.
But when he texted her for another date she calmly explained to him that when he wanted her to split the bill, she assumed they were just friends. He was like, "Oh no, I want to date you..." and she let him know they had no future.
She is from a wealthy family and had made her own money but that kind of rudeness and/or cluelessness sets a definitely bad precedent for how a guy will be in a relationship.
It's a massive red flag. Tell your friend to move on.
So, your friend is a whore? Got it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If this happened to me I would be looking at the guy like:
![]()
You invite me on a date and then cheap out even though I'm clearly starving?
You aren't entitled to dinner on a first date. Take responsibility for yourself, you spoiled, entitled woman.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah I think it's really rude, especially if I was noticeably hungry.
Would be a deal breaker for me, for sure.
My friend is not going on a second date with this guy. My friend's co-worker is the one who introduced them. The guy saw my friend and thought she was really pretty. My friend didn't really want to go but thought it could be fun. She is also new to the dating scene. I told her she should just have ordered some appetizers and paid for it if he did not pick up the tab.
She must not have liked the guy if she is going to dump him over not getting a free dinner. She sounds like a bit of a princess. High maintenance.
Anonymous wrote:I understand why she didn't order an app- she didn't want to be presumptuous. Even though she would've been willing to pay for it, he wouldn't have known that and would be telling his friend about the woman who tried to stick him for some food when he only wanted to pay for drinks.
I wouldn't see this guy again either, and I'm also in the camp of women who wouldn't consider a romantic relationship with a guy who split the bill on the first date.
MikeL wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm another woman who thinks if she was hungry she should have ordered food. If I was invited to go out for drinks at 7:30, I'd either eat before I showed up or say "Hey, I'm really hungry, I'm going to order some food."
Yes to this. The 7:30 time pretty much means there should be some food involved.
If you - as a guy - don't want to do food, make the date for 5:00-5:30 or so.