Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least she can tell her kid that she tried to find his/her dad.

I agree that she sounds insincere about the love at first sight stuff given that she doesn't even know the guy's name and all. But it's possible that she is keeping that name to herself as a way to identify the guy if he does come forward. Who knows.

Why? Because she wouldn't recognize him? Which well, may be the case.

Uh, yeah. It was a drunken ONS....beer goggles. Haha. He's probably a squat, pasty white dude with balding brown hair.

Anonymous wrote:she needs preventative botox on her forehead

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's great for you, just don't judge those who enjoy casual sex.

They show bad judgment and therefore should be judged accordingly.

I think you took a wrong turn from Christianmommies.con

This is dcurbanmoms not dcsinglemoms

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least she can tell her kid that she tried to find his/her dad.

I agree that she sounds insincere about the love at first sight stuff given that she doesn't even know the guy's name and all. But it's possible that she is keeping that name to herself as a way to identify the guy if he does come forward. Who knows.

Why? Because she wouldn't recognize him? Which well, may be the case.

Anonymous wrote:Why's the girl putting out this pity video to hook the guy? Shouldn't she accept the consequences of her actions and focus on being the best single mom that she can be?

Anonymous wrote:At least she can tell her kid that she tried to find his/her dad.

I agree that she sounds insincere about the love at first sight stuff given that she doesn't even know the guy's name and all. But it's possible that she is keeping that name to herself as a way to identify the guy if he does come forward. Who knows.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slut shaming is gross

I never understood this term. Isn't saying "slut shaming" pretty much acknowledging that yes, this person is a slut but lets not point out the obvious.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of people call me an uptight prude, but at least I've never been in this situation.

Sounds like there may be a lot of positive situations you haven't been in either. There is a w i d e space between not knowing the name of the man who impregnated you and being an uptight prude.

I'm perfectly happy with my sexual history, thanks.

That's awesome for you, though I wasn't just referring to sexual history. Given your happiness, guess it's not worth mentioning that people call you an uptight prude then, huh?

People call me an uptight prude simply because I never had casual sex. I think it's silly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of people call me an uptight prude, but at least I've never been in this situation.

Sounds like there may be a lot of positive situations you haven't been in either. There is a w i d e space between not knowing the name of the man who impregnated you and being an uptight prude.

I'm perfectly happy with my sexual history, thanks.

That's awesome for you, though I wasn't just referring to sexual history. Given your happiness, guess it's not worth mentioning that people call you an uptight prude then, huh?

People call me an uptight prude simply because I never had casual sex. I think it's silly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's great for you, just don't judge those who enjoy casual sex.

They show bad judgment and therefore should be judged accordingly.

I think you took a wrong turn from Christianmommies.con

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I can't believe that I remember this, but when I was in college, I took a women's studies course (natch) where the professor told us that in pagan Britain, women would pick an attractive man at Beltane, take him out in the fields, enjoy his company for the night, and wear the green stains on their clothing as a source of pride the next day. It was a fertility ritual for the benefit of the farmers and if a baby arrived the following spring, more's the better. No one worried about the paternity of the child.
I think she should look at this child as a Beltane baby and move on.

OK, let's all follow the pagans. I don't think our society is structured to handle so many babies with no fathers to help support them, clearly.

Clearky you are certainly take this thread personal. PP wasn't suggesting this should become a new trend.

Then what was PP suggesting by posting this? that stuff like this happened way back when before they had birth control? I saw a program once where in some culture in Asia there are no marriages, and the man goes to a woman's house at night to do the deed, then leave before the morning. And so?

Nice! No dirty socks to pick up.

But would you really want to raise that baby by yourself? I sure as heck wouldn't. But, yea, I get the no picking up the sock thing.

I would venture to guess that back in pagan Britain that it really was a "village" raising children, beltane babies were rare and special and it was a different time and culture. So hard to compare to today don't you think?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the video she says she lost her phone with his phone number.

How would she not know his name then?

Right, it sounds super shady. Unless she just forgot the name of her love at first sight guy.