Anonymous wrote:Here's a chart that shows men's attractiveness based on three levels physical, psychological and ncome level,

http://socionist.blogspot.com/2011/11/male-attractiveness-over-time.html?m=1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the OP missed the point totally. Most people marry within their age range because they pair off when the woman is still young and attractive. With their shared relationship and history they grow old together and that history makes up for the woman's fading looks as the couple ages together. All those examples of prince William and Kate Middleton proves this out.

For older men who don't meet their partners when young as they age they still go for the more attractive Younger wonen. George clooney is a prime example, isn't Amal like 20 years younger?

Amal IS much younger than George but at 37 years of age, she is hardly in the bloom of her youth. George had previously dated and bedded many beautiful women in their prime but the two times he danced his way down the aisle he did with a. an older woman and b. a woman who is past her prime. He could've married any of his previous girlfriends but he chose to settle down with a woman who exhibits intelligence and is probably a better companion to him. She is attractive and younger than him, but she is no Kate Upton.

Anonymous wrote:I think the OP missed the point totally. Most people marry within their age range because they pair off when the woman is still young and attractive. With their shared relationship and history they grow old together and that history makes up for the woman's fading looks as the couple ages together. All those examples of prince William and Kate Middleton proves this out.

For older men who don't meet their partners when young as they age they still go for the more attractive Younger wonen. George clooney is a prime example, isn't Amal like 20 years younger?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a chart that shows men's attractiveness based on three levels physical, psychological and ncome level,

http://socionist.blogspot.com/2011/11/male-attractiveness-over-time.html?m=1

See, this chart is assuming women care primarily about earning potential. Given the fact that a man in his twenties has every potential to be earning the same as the early thirties guy at that age (in fact, more since men who are married tend to earn more than their single counterparts) why not snag him when he's young and good looking. You'll still get the benefit of that early 30s and so on income.

Besides, i think most women in their twenties (myself and my friends at least) are mostly concerned with appearance. Of course, there should be a baseline- college educated with a job is a good thing. But most guys in their twenties already have that.

You exactly prove my point actually. Either you get these high earning potential young men when you both are in your twenties. When you reach your 30s the ones that are still not married have a way larger pool of women to choose from, what they don't have in physical attractiveness, though frankly I don't see it I think they still look good in their 30s, they make up for in their highly increased income.

The pool for eligible men will grow much much smaller.

From my personal observations though, I have never seen a 34 year old guy with a rising income be single and then shoot straight for the 25 year old to date and marry. 34 year old fresh law school grads or something usually are engaged to or married to a 32-33 year old law school girlfriend. OR a 34 year old guy is married with children to a girl he met when they both were young and broke in their mid-late twenties.

Single rich 34 year old men, are single by choice and are therefore players. A 24 year old girl will sleep with such a guy, for sure, and enjoy the perks of dating him and going to nice restaurants, but she would not marry him because he would not be marriage material to begin with.

Now, if there's a 34 year old attorney who is recently divorced with one kid, and he is looking to date seriously and find wife 2, he could try with a 24 year old girl but she would most likely NOT want a baby daddy. A 32-34 year old woman would most likely marry a divorced attorney with child.

The single 34 year lawyer is more likely to date a 27 to 28 year old than an over 30 year old when he starts getting serious about marriage.

Thats a 7 year gap. Would a 27 year old woman want to marry a 34 year old lawyer when she can marry a 28 year old law student?

Anonymous wrote:The most highly desirable age for women for marriage is mid to late thirties, under 25 still considered immature.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a chart that shows men's attractiveness based on three levels physical, psychological and ncome level,

http://socionist.blogspot.com/2011/11/male-attractiveness-over-time.html?m=1

See, this chart is assuming women care primarily about earning potential. Given the fact that a man in his twenties has every potential to be earning the same as the early thirties guy at that age (in fact, more since men who are married tend to earn more than their single counterparts) why not snag him when he's young and good looking. You'll still get the benefit of that early 30s and so on income.

Besides, i think most women in their twenties (myself and my friends at least) are mostly concerned with appearance. Of course, there should be a baseline- college educated with a job is a good thing. But most guys in their twenties already have that.

You exactly prove my point actually. Either you get these high earning potential young men when you both are in your twenties. When you reach your 30s the ones that are still not married have a way larger pool of women to choose from, what they don't have in physical attractiveness, though frankly I don't see it I think they still look good in their 30s, they make up for in their highly increased income.

The pool for eligible men will grow much much smaller.

From my personal observations though, I have never seen a 34 year old guy with a rising income be single and then shoot straight for the 25 year old to date and marry. 34 year old fresh law school grads or something usually are engaged to or married to a 32-33 year old law school girlfriend. OR a 34 year old guy is married with children to a girl he met when they both were young and broke in their mid-late twenties.

Single rich 34 year old men, are single by choice and are therefore players. A 24 year old girl will sleep with such a guy, for sure, and enjoy the perks of dating him and going to nice restaurants, but she would not marry him because he would not be marriage material to begin with.

Now, if there's a 34 year old attorney who is recently divorced with one kid, and he is looking to date seriously and find wife 2, he could try with a 24 year old girl but she would most likely NOT want a baby daddy. A 32-34 year old woman would most likely marry a divorced attorney with child.

The single 34 year lawyer is more likely to date a 27 to 28 year old than an over 30 year old when he starts getting serious about marriage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a chart that shows men's attractiveness based on three levels physical, psychological and ncome level,

http://socionist.blogspot.com/2011/11/male-attractiveness-over-time.html?m=1

See, this chart is assuming women care primarily about earning potential. Given the fact that a man in his twenties has every potential to be earning the same as the early thirties guy at that age (in fact, more since men who are married tend to earn more than their single counterparts) why not snag him when he's young and good looking. You'll still get the benefit of that early 30s and so on income.

Besides, i think most women in their twenties (myself and my friends at least) are mostly concerned with appearance. Of course, there should be a baseline- college educated with a job is a good thing. But most guys in their twenties already have that.

You exactly prove my point actually. Either you get these high earning potential young men when you both are in your twenties. When you reach your 30s the ones that are still not married have a way larger pool of women to choose from, what they don't have in physical attractiveness, though frankly I don't see it I think they still look good in their 30s, they make up for in their highly increased income.

The pool for eligible men will grow much much smaller.

From my personal observations though, I have never seen a 34 year old guy with a rising income be single and then shoot straight for the 25 year old to date and marry. 34 year old fresh law school grads or something usually are engaged to or married to a 32-33 year old law school girlfriend. OR a 34 year old guy is married with children to a girl he met when they both were young and broke in their mid-late twenties.

Single rich 34 year old men, are single by choice and are therefore players. A 24 year old girl will sleep with such a guy, for sure, and enjoy the perks of dating him and going to nice restaurants, but she would not marry him because he would not be marriage material to begin with.

Now, if there's a 34 year old attorney who is recently divorced with one kid, and he is looking to date seriously and find wife 2, he could try with a 24 year old girl but she would most likely NOT want a baby daddy. A 32-34 year old woman would most likely marry a divorced attorney with child.

The single 34 year lawyer is more likely to date a 27 to 28 year old than an over 30 year old when he starts getting serious about marriage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a chart that shows men's attractiveness based on three levels physical, psychological and ncome level,

http://socionist.blogspot.com/2011/11/male-attractiveness-over-time.html?m=1

See, this chart is assuming women care primarily about earning potential. Given the fact that a man in his twenties has every potential to be earning the same as the early thirties guy at that age (in fact, more since men who are married tend to earn more than their single counterparts) why not snag him when he's young and good looking. You'll still get the benefit of that early 30s and so on income.

Besides, i think most women in their twenties (myself and my friends at least) are mostly concerned with appearance. Of course, there should be a baseline- college educated with a job is a good thing. But most guys in their twenties already have that.

You exactly prove my point actually. Either you get these high earning potential young men when you both are in your twenties. When you reach your 30s the ones that are still not married have a way larger pool of women to choose from, what they don't have in physical attractiveness, though frankly I don't see it I think they still look good in their 30s, they make up for in their highly increased income.

The pool for eligible men will grow much much smaller.

I dont think I did prove your point, and I think if you think I did, you might not be quite understanding what all was said.

Men are less physically attractive, by a large margin, in their thirties. This is undisputed.

For most women in their twenties, physical attractiveness is the most important thing. Which is why a really hot, young guy can walk into any bar and get laid that night- have his pick of the women.

Unfortunately for men in their thirties, their attractiveness levels take a BIG hit. There was a board about that on here just the other night.

Some women will be able to tolerate that hit, so long as it is supplanted by income- or, depending on their desperation levels,regardless.

But many wil not, especially those at the top of the pyramid who can date a guy in his twenties who is also earning a good salary.

Alright. You win. Younger men prefer older women. Mid twenties women prefer looks over everything else. Women in their 30s will have just as easy a time as men in their 30s dating. No one will date those ugly 30 something men.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a chart that shows men's attractiveness based on three levels physical, psychological and ncome level,

http://socionist.blogspot.com/2011/11/male-attractiveness-over-time.html?m=1

See, this chart is assuming women care primarily about earning potential. Given the fact that a man in his twenties has every potential to be earning the same as the early thirties guy at that age (in fact, more since men who are married tend to earn more than their single counterparts) why not snag him when he's young and good looking. You'll still get the benefit of that early 30s and so on income.

Besides, i think most women in their twenties (myself and my friends at least) are mostly concerned with appearance. Of course, there should be a baseline- college educated with a job is a good thing. But most guys in their twenties already have that.

You exactly prove my point actually. Either you get these high earning potential young men when you both are in your twenties. When you reach your 30s the ones that are still not married have a way larger pool of women to choose from, what they don't have in physical attractiveness, though frankly I don't see it I think they still look good in their 30s, they make up for in their highly increased income.

The pool for eligible men will grow much much smaller.

From my personal observations though, I have never seen a 34 year old guy with a rising income be single and then shoot straight for the 25 year old to date and marry. 34 year old fresh law school grads or something usually are engaged to or married to a 32-33 year old law school girlfriend. OR a 34 year old guy is married with children to a girl he met when they both were young and broke in their mid-late twenties.

Single rich 34 year old men, are single by choice and are therefore players. A 24 year old girl will sleep with such a guy, for sure, and enjoy the perks of dating him and going to nice restaurants, but she would not marry him because he would not be marriage material to begin with.

Now, if there's a 34 year old attorney who is recently divorced with one kid, and he is looking to date seriously and find wife 2, he could try with a 24 year old girl but she would most likely NOT want a baby daddy. A 32-34 year old woman would most likely marry a divorced attorney with child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a chart that shows men's attractiveness based on three levels physical, psychological and ncome level,

http://socionist.blogspot.com/2011/11/male-attractiveness-over-time.html?m=1

See, this chart is assuming women care primarily about earning potential. Given the fact that a man in his twenties has every potential to be earning the same as the early thirties guy at that age (in fact, more since men who are married tend to earn more than their single counterparts) why not snag him when he's young and good looking. You'll still get the benefit of that early 30s and so on income.

Besides, i think most women in their twenties (myself and my friends at least) are mostly concerned with appearance. Of course, there should be a baseline- college educated with a job is a good thing. But most guys in their twenties already have that.

You exactly prove my point actually. Either you get these high earning potential young men when you both are in your twenties. When you reach your 30s the ones that are still not married have a way larger pool of women to choose from, what they don't have in physical attractiveness, though frankly I don't see it I think they still look good in their 30s, they make up for in their highly increased income.

The pool for eligible men will grow much much smaller.

I dont think I did prove your point, and I think if you think I did, you might not be quite understanding what all was said.

Men are less physically attractive, by a large margin, in their thirties. This is undisputed.

For most women in their twenties, physical attractiveness is the most important thing. Which is why a really hot, young guy can walk into any bar and get laid that night- have his pick of the women.

Unfortunately for men in their thirties, their attractiveness levels take a BIG hit. There was a board about that on here just the other night.

Some women will be able to tolerate that hit, so long as it is supplanted by income- or, depending on their desperation levels,regardless.

But many wil not, especially those at the top of the pyramid who can date a guy in his twenties who is also earning a good salary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a chart that shows men's attractiveness based on three levels physical, psychological and ncome level,

http://socionist.blogspot.com/2011/11/male-attractiveness-over-time.html?m=1

See, this chart is assuming women care primarily about earning potential. Given the fact that a man in his twenties has every potential to be earning the same as the early thirties guy at that age (in fact, more since men who are married tend to earn more than their single counterparts) why not snag him when he's young and good looking. You'll still get the benefit of that early 30s and so on income.

Besides, i think most women in their twenties (myself and my friends at least) are mostly concerned with appearance. Of course, there should be a baseline- college educated with a job is a good thing. But most guys in their twenties already have that.

You exactly prove my point actually. Either you get these high earning potential young men when you both are in your twenties. When you reach your 30s the ones that are still not married have a way larger pool of women to choose from, what they don't have in physical attractiveness, though frankly I don't see it I think they still look good in their 30s, they make up for in their highly increased income.

The pool for eligible men will grow much much smaller.