Conservative here- that was no lady but I'd be happy to see Shapiro beat up by anyone for any reason!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me add this point: Can you even begin to fathom the amount of anger, outrage, social media blow-ups and general hoo-ha that would result if this situation had been reversed? If a straight white male conservative commentator had put his hands on --- and in some way threatened - -- a so-called transgendered person, on national television?

Yes, poor you! Always the victim!
When does the official war on Christmas start?

I see you failed to address the statement. You know pp is entirely correct. Your sarcasm doesn't do anything but highlight the veracity of his/her statement. Condoning this behavior simply because you agree with the underlying message causes you to lose all moral authority.

Such nonsense. People are having fun at the stunning predictability and "poor us" tone of your post. No one could possibly miss what you are trying to say as Conservatives say it CONSTANTLY. You always try to play the victim and it is truly laughable.

No one should ever be threatened with violence.

That said, I actually do believe this was a total setup and those involved simply did it for the controversy and you fell for it. Breitbart has done it before and so has Fox News.

. How can a intelligent adult with a modicum of rational thought processes make an all encompassing statement about a stranger on the internet? They can't and have the attributed listed.

Simple observation.

Sadly, you are once again demonstrated your narrow-minded ignorance and lack of critical thinking.

Actually, no. Observation and education (reading) are the only ways to accurately self-inform. Believe it or not, some of us don;t need Fox News to tell us what or how to think.

Defaulting to Fox News speak shows an inability to discuss issues on the merits as does claiming to know that a random stranger on the internet 'always tries to play the victim." Your lack of critical thinking is what is laughable as is the fact that you entirely missed the point of this exchange.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breitbart? Are you kidding me?! I doubt this even even happened.

+ Probably two actors playing the parts like their ridiculous acted and edited Acorn video. Breitbart is for the double-digit IQ crowd only.

I'm guessing you don't work with special needs children or have a child with special needs.

Yes, I do. I am not the PP but I am a full time special needs teacher and most of my autistic students have very high IQs. The Downs Syndrome children haven't been tested with IQ standards for decades.

So what are you taking about? A double-digit IQ (85 to 99) is still within the normal range.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LoL

You know that when a SNL sketch resembles what passes for modern liberal America, we are all doomed.

Those 3 are hilarious, though.

Imagine trying to sit at a table with 3 mentally ill men dressed in women's clothing, wigs, makeup, etc, and pretending it's normal.


Sorry, it's not. It's insanity.

Women are born, not created in a doctor's office or lab.

Frankenstein's monster was more natural.

You are an ass. It is an OLD comedy skit that has nothing to do with the plight of the transgendered community.

Typical Conservative/Republican - no sense of humor or irony and always missing the point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me add this point: Can you even begin to fathom the amount of anger, outrage, social media blow-ups and general hoo-ha that would result if this situation had been reversed? If a straight white male conservative commentator had put his hands on --- and in some way threatened - -- a so-called transgendered person, on national television?

Yes, poor you! Always the victim!
When does the official war on Christmas start?

I see you failed to address the statement. You know pp is entirely correct. Your sarcasm doesn't do anything but highlight the veracity of his/her statement. Condoning this behavior simply because you agree with the underlying message causes you to lose all moral authority.

Such nonsense. People are having fun at the stunning predictability and "poor us" tone of your post. No one could possibly miss what you are trying to say as Conservatives say it CONSTANTLY. You always try to play the victim and it is truly laughable.

No one should ever be threatened with violence.

That said, I actually do believe this was a total setup and those involved simply did it for the controversy and you fell for it. Breitbart has done it before and so has Fox News.

. How can a intelligent adult with a modicum of rational thought processes make an all encompassing statement about a stranger on the internet? They can't and have the attributed listed.

Simple observation.

Sadly, you are once again demonstrated your narrow-minded ignorance and lack of critical thinking.

Actually, no. Observation and education (reading) are the only ways to accurately self-inform. Believe it or not, some of us don;t need Fox News to tell us what or how to think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me add this point: Can you even begin to fathom the amount of anger, outrage, social media blow-ups and general hoo-ha that would result if this situation had been reversed? If a straight white male conservative commentator had put his hands on --- and in some way threatened - -- a so-called transgendered person, on national television?

Yes, poor you! Always the victim!
When does the official war on Christmas start?

I see you failed to address the statement. You know pp is entirely correct. Your sarcasm doesn't do anything but highlight the veracity of his/her statement. Condoning this behavior simply because you agree with the underlying message causes you to lose all moral authority.

Such nonsense. People are having fun at the stunning predictability and "poor us" tone of your post. No one could possibly miss what you are trying to say as Conservatives say it CONSTANTLY. You always try to play the victim and it is truly laughable.

No one should ever be threatened with violence.

That said, I actually do believe this was a total setup and those involved simply did it for the controversy and you fell for it. Breitbart has done it before and so has Fox News.

. How can a intelligent adult with a modicum of rational thought processes make an all encompassing statement about a stranger on the internet? They can't and have the attributed listed.

Simple observation.

Sadly, you are once again demonstrated your narrow-minded ignorance and lack of critical thinking.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me add this point: Can you even begin to fathom the amount of anger, outrage, social media blow-ups and general hoo-ha that would result if this situation had been reversed? If a straight white male conservative commentator had put his hands on --- and in some way threatened - -- a so-called transgendered person, on national television?

Yes, poor you! Always the victim!
When does the official war on Christmas start?

I see you failed to address the statement. You know pp is entirely correct. Your sarcasm doesn't do anything but highlight the veracity of his/her statement. Condoning this behavior simply because you agree with the underlying message causes you to lose all moral authority.

Such nonsense. People are having fun at the stunning predictability and "poor us" tone of your post. No one could possibly miss what you are trying to say as Conservatives say it CONSTANTLY. You always try to play the victim and it is truly laughable.

No one should ever be threatened with violence.

That said, I actually do believe this was a total setup and those involved simply did it for the controversy and you fell for it. Breitbart has done it before and so has Fox News.

. How can a intelligent adult with a modicum of rational thought processes make an all encompassing statement about a stranger on the internet? They can't and have the attributed listed.

Simple observation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me add this point: Can you even begin to fathom the amount of anger, outrage, social media blow-ups and general hoo-ha that would result if this situation had been reversed? If a straight white male conservative commentator had put his hands on --- and in some way threatened - -- a so-called transgendered person, on national television?

Yes, poor you! Always the victim!
When does the official war on Christmas start?

I see you failed to address the statement. You know pp is entirely correct. Your sarcasm doesn't do anything but highlight the veracity of his/her statement. Condoning this behavior simply because you agree with the underlying message causes you to lose all moral authority.

Such nonsense. People are having fun at the stunning predictability and "poor us" tone of your post. No one could possibly miss what you are trying to say as Conservatives say it CONSTANTLY. You always try to play the victim and it is truly laughable.

No one should ever be threatened with violence.

That said, I actually do believe this was a total setup and those involved simply did it for the controversy and you fell for it. Breitbart has done it before and so has Fox News.

. How can a intelligent adult with a modicum of rational thought processes make an all encompassing statement about a stranger on the internet? They can't and have the attributed listed.

Anonymous wrote:

LoL

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shapiro is a Harvard educated lawyer. If He got in with a double-digit IQ, I guess so did Obama?

Not Shapiro, Idiot, the people who believe his "act" and the set ups of TV "interviews" and debates on sites like Breitbart have double-digit IQs.

I know Ben. I can assure you, you are incorrect. I have no idea when the points above grew wings. I assime this is what a higher education is these days - tells you what to think as opposed to how to think

Anonymous wrote:Shapiro is a Harvard educated lawyer. If He got in with a double-digit IQ, I guess so did Obama?

Not Shapiro, Idiot, the people who believe his "act" and the set ups of TV "interviews" and debates on sites like Breitbart have double-digit IQs.

Shapiro is a Harvard educated lawyer. If He got in with a double-digit IQ, I guess so did Obama?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me add this point: Can you even begin to fathom the amount of anger, outrage, social media blow-ups and general hoo-ha that would result if this situation had been reversed? If a straight white male conservative commentator had put his hands on --- and in some way threatened - -- a so-called transgendered person, on national television?

Yes, poor you! Always the victim!
When does the official war on Christmas start?

I see you failed to address the statement. You know pp is entirely correct. Your sarcasm doesn't do anything but highlight the veracity of his/her statement. Condoning this behavior simply because you agree with the underlying message causes you to lose all moral authority.

Such nonsense. People are having fun at the stunning predictability and "poor us" tone of your post. No one could possibly miss what you are trying to say as Conservatives say it CONSTANTLY. You always try to play the victim and it is truly laughable.

No one should ever be threatened with violence.

That said, I actually do believe this was a total setup and those involved simply did it for the controversy and you fell for it. Breitbart has done it before and so has Fox News.

Not pp.
Once again, we have someone who believes that no transgender person can be so hateful to threaten violence.
Sure, Tur was TOLD to threaten to send Shapiro home in an ambulance.

You are a fool to believe that doesn't happen ALL THE TIME in cheap journalism and "reality" TV.

I wrote clearly that no one should threaten violence. I simply do not believe ANYTHING I read or see on trash sites like Breitbart.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me add this point: Can you even begin to fathom the amount of anger, outrage, social media blow-ups and general hoo-ha that would result if this situation had been reversed? If a straight white male conservative commentator had put his hands on --- and in some way threatened - -- a so-called transgendered person, on national television?

Yes, poor you! Always the victim!
When does the official war on Christmas start?

I see you failed to address the statement. You know pp is entirely correct. Your sarcasm doesn't do anything but highlight the veracity of his/her statement. Condoning this behavior simply because you agree with the underlying message causes you to lose all moral authority.

Such nonsense. People are having fun at the stunning predictability and "poor us" tone of your post. No one could possibly miss what you are trying to say as Conservatives say it CONSTANTLY. You always try to play the victim and it is truly laughable.

No one should ever be threatened with violence.

That said, I actually do believe this was a total setup and those involved simply did it for the controversy and you fell for it. Breitbart has done it before and so has Fox News.

Not pp.
Once again, we have someone who believes that no transgender person can be so hateful to threaten violence.
Sure, Tur was TOLD to threaten to send Shapiro home in an ambulance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me add this point: Can you even begin to fathom the amount of anger, outrage, social media blow-ups and general hoo-ha that would result if this situation had been reversed? If a straight white male conservative commentator had put his hands on --- and in some way threatened - -- a so-called transgendered person, on national television?

Yes, poor you! Always the victim!
When does the official war on Christmas start?

I see you failed to address the statement. You know pp is entirely correct. Your sarcasm doesn't do anything but highlight the veracity of his/her statement. Condoning this behavior simply because you agree with the underlying message causes you to lose all moral authority.

Such nonsense. People are having fun at the stunning predictability and "poor us" tone of your post. No one could possibly miss what you are trying to say as Conservatives say it CONSTANTLY. You always try to play the victim and it is truly laughable.

No one should ever be threatened with violence.

That said, I actually do believe this was a total setup and those involved simply did it for the controversy and you fell for it. Breitbart has done it before and so has Fox News.