Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see if this works in that it is deliberately challenging the model of giftedness that most of us were raised with ie a test indicates you are advanced and theirfore gifted. For way to long this essentially fixed who had opportunity based on where they lived and their parents income.
What I like about the DC method is that it does not presume intelligence is fixed but instead adopts the growth model that all kids that express curiousity and interest can benefit from a program that teaches them how to explore an idea more deeply allowing them to apply that to other programs.
I do worry as other have noted though that this really takes more adults and money that DC is willing to give it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:some people do. Others realize that as long as their child is being challenged appropriately than they're doing good. Does Sidwell Friends have gt by the way?
What kind of question is that? Sidwell obviously only takes very bright kids without apparent learning disabilities or behavioral problems.
Anonymous wrote:some people do. Others realize that as long as their child is being challenged appropriately than they're doing good. Does Sidwell Friends have gt by the way?
Anonymous wrote:"The principal said he did not think everyone could be served well in a mainstream class."
Wait. No differentiation in the mainstream classes?
It's about time. Students who excel and want to learn should be given this opportunity. Especially when they're in classes with disruptive students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe the gifted and talented programs in your city was like SEM. I grew up in NYC where gifted and talented programs were like AAP programs with advanced and accelerated academics and to get it, there are strict IQ cut offs even for K.
K is way too young. if you ever read nurtureshock they have a great chapter about how testing in kindergarten only just demonstrates which kid either were prepped within an inch of their life (usually by parents with lots of resources) or just precocious in their academic development. in many of these cases the general education students will outperform the magnet students by 3rd or 4th grade which is why Fairfax in McHenry County don't have gifted programs until 3rd or 4th grade.
so you think it's dangerous to assume that giftedness is a proxy for being middle-class there is no correlations at being smart automatically means you're going to be better behaved or less disruptive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe the gifted and talented programs in your city was like SEM. I grew up in NYC where gifted and talented programs were like AAP programs with advanced and accelerated academics and to get it, there are strict IQ cut offs even for K.
K is way too young. if you ever read nurtureshock they have a great chapter about how testing in kindergarten only just demonstrates which kid either were prepped within an inch of their life (usually by parents with lots of resources) or just precocious in their academic development. in many of these cases the general education students will outperform the magnet students by 3rd or 4th grade which is why Fairfax in McHenry County don't have gifted programs until 3rd or 4th grade.
so you think it's dangerous to assume that giftedness is a proxy for being middle-class there is no correlations at being smart automatically means you're going to be better behaved or less disruptive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish the District did start a gifted program like the kind that some poster want, if only to see the reactions of some of these parents when their kids don't test into it!
Go this is the AP bored and you can see all kinds of parents gnashing their teeth because thier darling precious spwshul snowflake didn't get into the program. in many cases they will pay out of pocket to get special testing if the kid doesn't succeed the first time around.
Anonymous wrote:
Maybe the gifted and talented programs in your city was like SEM. I grew up in NYC where gifted and talented programs were like AAP programs with advanced and accelerated academics and to get it, there are strict IQ cut offs even for K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With better schools it would be even better/ higher prices
Doubtful. Being in Ward 6 with crappy schools and near housing projects haven't hurt prices:
http://www.citycenterdc.com/
It's all about location, location, location. Everything else including quality of public schools is secondary.