Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: And TBH, if Zimmerman were Black or identified as Hispanic, many of you would consider him the ne'er do well thug that he is.

Nobody cares less about black thugs killing other black thugs than the black community.

Followed only by the news media, which does not regard black-on-black or black-on-white violence as "newsworthy" because they do not Support The Narrative.

The black community is complex and diverse. What small sample of apathetic assholes are you glancing at from a far and assuming their attitudes reflect that of all black people?

Anonymous wrote: And TBH, if Zimmerman were Black or identified as Hispanic, many of you would consider him the ne'er do well thug that he is.

Nobody cares less about black thugs killing other black thugs than the black community.

Followed only by the news media, which does not regard black-on-black or black-on-white violence as "newsworthy" because they do not Support The Narrative.

Well, I do not want him dead, but I have no sympathy for him.

Known hot head and fuck up who only stayed out of trouble because of his father's connections. Starts a confrontation that he had no business starting (as evidenced by the 911 operator's instructions). In the midst of getting his ass kicked in a confrontation that he started, he pulls out a gun and shoots the unarmed teen kicking his ass. Because of the techinal nature of Florida self defense law, he is acquitted although jurors later say that they did not want to acquit him but the law tied their hands. Even if I believe that the verdict was just, this guy is NOT a sympathetic figure.

Aside from Trayvon Martin, ask the other people that he assaulted whether they are surprised by anything pertaining to him. And TBH, if Zimmerman were Black or identified as Hispanic, many of you would consider him the ne'er do well thug that he is.

So it seems a thread was started about Zimmerman, when now we are finding out some nutter is stalking Zimmerman. We can thank the media hype for that, as they certainly contributed to the fiasco that was Zimmerman/Martin.

And we also discover that some are STILL not aware of the forensic evidence in the trial, which most certainly helped acquit Zimmerman.

Aces.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He needs to die. Why is he not dead? He needs to die.

+1000 killers need the chair

Both of you sound unhinged. Seek professional help immediately. Please?

Anonymous wrote:He needs to die. Why is he not dead? He needs to die.

+1000 killers need the chair

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous



Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Zimmerman shoot Martin as he was having his head bashed into a curb by Martin? Perhaps that's why he was aquitted?

No one had their head bashed in. Zimmerman was stalking Martin and Martin confronted him. Being a gunnut and unable to defend himself in the way men have for centuries, Zimmerman was quickly over powered by Martin. Martin started to walk away and Zimmerman shoot him in the back. It's the way of the gunnuts.

Well someone certainly is nuts; you've proven that.

Do you dispute the forensics?

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/09/nation/la-na-nn-george-zimmerman-trial-20130709

I am consistently amazed at the quality of individuals on this site. Sometimes it's like talking to Pee Wee Herman.

Um, I think you have me confused with the PP blathering on about gun nuts. PP is clearly crazy if she really believes Travon was shot in the back. She probably also believes Mike Brown had his hands up - when the forensics clearly demonstrated otherwise.

Ah, sorry - I thought you were telling me I was crazy for stating what forensics showed. Mia Culpa!

Anonymous wrote:He needs to die. Why is he not dead? He needs to die.

Have you always harbored such hatred in your heart? It's really rather sad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous



Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Zimmerman shoot Martin as he was having his head bashed into a curb by Martin? Perhaps that's why he was aquitted?

No one had their head bashed in. Zimmerman was stalking Martin and Martin confronted him. Being a gunnut and unable to defend himself in the way men have for centuries, Zimmerman was quickly over powered by Martin. Martin started to walk away and Zimmerman shoot him in the back. It's the way of the gunnuts.

Well someone certainly is nuts; you've proven that.

Do you dispute the forensics?

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/09/nation/la-na-nn-george-zimmerman-trial-20130709

I am consistently amazed at the quality of individuals on this site. Sometimes it's like talking to Pee Wee Herman.

Um, I think you have me confused with the PP blathering on about gun nuts. PP is clearly crazy if she really believes Travon was shot in the back. She probably also believes Mike Brown had his hands up - when the forensics clearly demonstrated otherwise.

He needs to die. Why is he not dead? He needs to die.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous



Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Zimmerman shoot Martin as he was having his head bashed into a curb by Martin? Perhaps that's why he was aquitted?

No one had their head bashed in. Zimmerman was stalking Martin and Martin confronted him. Being a gunnut and unable to defend himself in the way men have for centuries, Zimmerman was quickly over powered by Martin. Martin started to walk away and Zimmerman shoot him in the back. It's the way of the gunnuts.

Well someone certainly is nuts; you've proven that.

Do you dispute the forensics?

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/09/nation/la-na-nn-george-zimmerman-trial-20130709

I am consistently amazed at the quality of individuals on this site. Sometimes it's like talking to Pee Wee Herman.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous



Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Zimmerman shoot Martin as he was having his head bashed into a curb by Martin? Perhaps that's why he was aquitted?

No one had their head bashed in. Zimmerman was stalking Martin and Martin confronted him. Being a gunnut and unable to defend himself in the way men have for centuries, Zimmerman was quickly over powered by Martin. Martin started to walk away and Zimmerman shoot him in the back. It's the way of the gunnuts.

Well someone certainly is nuts; you've proven that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous



Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Zimmerman shoot Martin as he was having his head bashed into a curb by Martin? Perhaps that's why he was aquitted?

No one had their head bashed in. Zimmerman was stalking Martin and Martin confronted him. Being a gunnut and unable to defend himself in the way men have for centuries, Zimmerman was quickly over powered by Martin. Martin started to walk away and Zimmerman shoot him in the back. It's the way of the gunnuts.

The forensics didn't show a shot to the back. It showed a shot to the chest at an angle that indicated that Martin was on top of Zimmerman. Furthermore, there were eyewitnesses. Where on EARTH do you people get your new from? Good LORD!

Anonymous



Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Zimmerman shoot Martin as he was having his head bashed into a curb by Martin? Perhaps that's why he was aquitted?

No one had their head bashed in. Zimmerman was stalking Martin and Martin confronted him. Being a gunnut and unable to defend himself in the way men have for centuries, Zimmerman was quickly over powered by Martin. Martin started to walk away and Zimmerman shoot him in the back. It's the way of the gunnuts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Zimmerman shoot Martin as he was having his head bashed into a curb by Martin? Perhaps that's why he was aquitted?

You're correct that Zimmerman SAID he shot Martin as he was having his head bashed into a curb by Martin.

Forensics showed the angle was correct. Do progressive liberals believe in forensics?