Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There is a law. Google it... md case law. Guidelines are written for those that can't/won't understand the law.
Is there a law, or is there case law?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Scenario: 6 yo falls off the monkey bars and breaks his arm. What will the 10 yo do?
Call for help, presumably. What do you think?
I was 11 when my 9 year old sister fell off the monkey bars and broke her leg. I called for help - a woman was running nearby and I asked her to help us. She called an ambulance, paramedics called police, police called parents, we all met at the hospital. No big deal. No one accused my parents of being negligent. It's disturbing that we've created a mentality that kids of this age can't be left alone for a moment in public places.
Of course, you were fortunate that a woman was running nearby. But, you know, you still disrupted that woman's day/routine and probably had to wait for her to appear, but had a parent or adult chaperone been with you things would have worked out differently. I mean, for starters -- an ambulance? REALLY? For a broken leg? Dramatic much? A parent would have driven you to the hospital.
That said, I have much less issue with 11 and 9 than I do with 10 and 6.
Anonymous wrote:Why would the police even pick up the Kids? I'd laugh at the person who called. You'd think they have more important issues to deal with.
Anonymous wrote:UGH! I hope I don't have to see those attention whores on tv.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Scenario: 6 yo falls off the monkey bars and breaks his arm. What will the 10 yo do?
Call for help, presumably. What do you think?
I was 11 when my 9 year old sister fell off the monkey bars and broke her leg. I called for help - a woman was running nearby and I asked her to help us. She called an ambulance, paramedics called police, police called parents, we all met at the hospital. No big deal. No one accused my parents of being negligent. It's disturbing that we've created a mentality that kids of this age can't be left alone for a moment in public places.
Anonymous wrote:
There is a law. Google it... md case law. Guidelines are written for those that can't/won't understand the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:6 is way too young to be without adult supervision.
Maybe for some kids, or even a lot of kids, but definitely not every kid.
No, for every kid. The end.
Six-year-olds used to be capable of being out without adult supervision. Six-year-olds in other countries to this day are capable of being out without adult supervision. Do middle-class people in the US just have particularly incompetent six-year-olds, these days?
When were six-year-olds commonly walking around without adult supervision? Be specific.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:6 is way too young to be without adult supervision.
Maybe for some kids, or even a lot of kids, but definitely not every kid.
No, for every kid. The end.
Six-year-olds used to be capable of being out without adult supervision. Six-year-olds in other countries to this day are capable of being out without adult supervision. Do middle-class people in the US just have particularly incompetent six-year-olds, these days?
Kids raise in environments like DC tend to be less competent because their parents are involved in every decision they make. Kids (like mine) who were raised in more rural environments are very different. It's not a US thing. It's a helicopter parent thing.
Anonymous wrote:These parents are horrible. They obviously didn't learn their lesson but they will. They seem so lazy. Would it kill them to spend time with the kids? Selfish idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:6 is way too young to be without adult supervision.
Maybe for some kids, or even a lot of kids, but definitely not every kid.
No, for every kid. The end.
Six-year-olds used to be capable of being out without adult supervision. Six-year-olds in other countries to this day are capable of being out without adult supervision. Do middle-class people in the US just have particularly incompetent six-year-olds, these days?
Anonymous wrote:The parents should NOT use their kids to make a statement. It should be clear to them that they do not live in an area where the community agrees with their style of parenting. So start a free-range advocacy group, write a book, or move to an area that agrees with your parenting philosophy. But for now, play by the rules. If CPS wants you to supervise your kids at public places, do it. If you don't, you have to know that the kids might be picked up again by CPS. That is simply TOO MUCH STRESS to put on these kids.