Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's the big deal? You are going to give a gift.....just give them whatever you would have spent in form of cash, check or a gift card. No big deal. Jeez people.
No, you are wrong. It is wrong to specify that you want cash. It is a big deal and stunningly rude.
It is rude to specify that you want cash -- in mainstream US culture, on most occasions. It's not universally true everywhere for everybody.
However, we are IN THE U.S. I don't care what you're used to elsewhere. You're here now.
We're in the US! We don't need to care what other people do elsewhere in the rest of the world! -- eh, PP?
NP here. What other people do in the rest of the world is all well and good. The point is that when you come to the US and you do something that is considered rude here, you're going to rub people the wrong way. e.g., inviting the whole class to a birthday party, most of whom are probably not used to YOUR cultural norms instead of those in the US and then specifying that you want cash for your six year old, which here is considered, as PP said, stunningly rude. You'll probably get a lot of people just not coming (and maybe they prefer it that way anyway).
Anonymous wrote:You all would honestly rather drag your small children to Target to buy a toy for a child's birthday party rather than to just put some cash you already have and would have spent at Target, into an envelope? If I thought cash were a generally acceptable child birthday present I would give it to everyone,
Anonymous wrote:I'm thinking that a puppy or kitten would be the perfect present here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's the big deal? You are going to give a gift.....just give them whatever you would have spent in form of cash, check or a gift card. No big deal. Jeez people.
No, you are wrong. It is wrong to specify that you want cash. It is a big deal and stunningly rude.
It is rude to specify that you want cash -- in mainstream US culture, on most occasions. It's not universally true everywhere for everybody.
However, we are IN THE U.S. I don't care what you're used to elsewhere. You're here now.
We're in the US! We don't need to care what other people do elsewhere in the rest of the world! -- eh, PP?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's the bid deal? You are going to give a gift.....just give them whatever you would have spent in form of cash, check or a gift card. No big deal. Jeez people.
No, you are wrong. It is wrong to specify that you want cash. It is a big deal and stunningly rude.
I don't believe it's a big deal. Why do the song and dance about a gift? Times are a changing....if you are going to give a gift, why not give something you know the person wants?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have never heard of this and I think it is horrible. I would not, absolutely not, comply. It is a GIFT - not a utility payment of cash.
You would give a boxed gift, when the invitation specifically asked you not to?
I sure would! In America, we don't write "no boxed gifts" on invites.
Anonymous wrote:If someone specified no boxes gift, I wouldn't give a gift at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have never heard of this and I think it is horrible. I would not, absolutely not, comply. It is a GIFT - not a utility payment of cash.
You would give a boxed gift, when the invitation specifically asked you not to?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have never heard of this and I think it is horrible. I would not, absolutely not, comply. It is a GIFT - not a utility payment of cash.
You would give a boxed gift, when the invitation specifically asked you not to?
PP didn't say that.
Do you get the difference between "gift" and "shakedown"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have never heard of this and I think it is horrible. I would not, absolutely not, comply. It is a GIFT - not a utility payment of cash.
You would give a boxed gift, when the invitation specifically asked you not to?