Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[foryfor kite=Antheir mous]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. Spouses should ALWAYS come first. Always.
Spouses should come first in intact families. Parents should not disregard already-born children for their flavor of the week.
+1. Let the angry second wives come out in full force, but the ethics here simply are not the same if both spouses aren't also joint parents of all the kids.
If the people involved truly believed in putting children above all else, they would have chosen their child's other parent more carefully and stayed married. The very fact that a stepparent is in the picture is evidence that at least one of those parents already put themselves ahead of the children. Being married to an "angry second wife" in itself is evidence that that parent does not put the child first because a man who wants to put his children first will not marry a woman who does not. Angry ex-wives don't want to admit that they picked a crappy parent for their child. He chose her but you chose him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. Spouses should ALWAYS come first. Always.
Spouses should come first in intact families. Parents should not disregard already-born children for their flavor of the week.
+1. Let the angry second wives come out in full force, but the ethics here simply are not the same if both spouses aren't also joint parents of all the kids.
If the people involved truly believed in putting children above all else, they would have chosen their child's other parent more carefully and stayed married. The very fact that a stepparent is in the picture is evidence that at least one of those parents already put themselves ahead of the children. Being married to an "angry second wife" in itself is evidence that that parent does not put the child first because a man who wants to put his children first will not marry a woman who does not. Angry ex-wives don't want to admit that they picked a crappy parent for their child. He chose her but you chose him.
Uh, what does that say about the second wife? She picked him too. Your diatribe makes little sense.
Anonymous wrote:I totally disagree with folks who say that children should come first. No wonder we have so many divorces!
The person you promised to be with forever should come first. Children should be a shared priority between you while they are CHILDREN. Once they are adults, if you have done a good job as parents, they will be FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENT ADULTS. Your relationship with them will hopefully be loving, affectionate, and warm. But their needs as adults should be primarily taken care of by themselves. And thus your marriage should still be your top priority.
OP, I'm sorry you have such a bad relationship with your stepdaughters. That must be hard for all of you.
Anonymous wrote:[foryfor kite=Antheir mous]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. Spouses should ALWAYS come first. Always.
Spouses should come first in intact families. Parents should not disregard already-born children for their flavor of the week.
+1. Let the angry second wives come out in full force, but the ethics here simply are not the same if both spouses aren't also joint parents of all the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. Spouses should ALWAYS come first. Always.
Spouses should come first in intact families. Parents should not disregard already-born children for their flavor of the week.
+1. Let the angry second wives come out in full force, but the ethics here simply are not the same if both spouses aren't also joint parents of all the kids.
If the people involved truly believed in putting children above all else, they would have chosen their child's other parent more carefully and stayed married. The very fact that a stepparent is in the picture is evidence that at least one of those parents already put themselves ahead of the children. Being married to an "angry second wife" in itself is evidence that that parent does not put the child first because a man who wants to put his children first will not marry a woman who does not. Angry ex-wives don't want to admit that they picked a crappy parent for their child. He chose her but you chose him.
Anonymous wrote:One gave me a major attitude because we "ONLY" gave a bib set as a baby shower gift. I don't want to spend time with people who are going to be giving me attitudes.
Yes- DH and I are well off but we enjoy spending time and our resources with each other. DH worked hard and so have I. They are in their mid-20's. It's time for them to be completely independent financially and emotionally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. Spouses should ALWAYS come first. Always.
I might be wrong, but I suspect you're a man.
It's generally to men's long-term benefit for spouses to come first, because men are likely to be taken care of by their wives in their later years.
It's not so much in women's interest -- men generally (though of course not always) predecease their wives, and their widows are more likely to depend on their adult children in their later years.
My grandmother was a widow for 20 years. For 15 of those, she was vigorous and independent, but for the last five, it was my mom who spent a couple hours with her at her nursing home *every single evening* (after working a full-time job during the day). My grandfather, though he was a fine man, certainly wasn't able to do that from the grave.
Anonymous wrote:They probably hate you, too. Every time they look at you, they imagine you on your knees in front of their father.