Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:anybody have any idea with what is going on with the rest of the sws wait list? We have a decent number for PS3.
Not to discourage you but last year we were #5 on the waitlist for ps3 and never got a call.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:anybody have any idea with what is going on with the rest of the sws wait list? We have a decent number for PS3.
Not to discourage you but last year we were #5 on the waitlist for ps3 and never got a call.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go with LAMB. It is more likely that you can make the switch to CHML next year if you find the Montessori at LAMB to be too light for your taste. Unfortunately it is not likely that you would be able to move in the opposite direction. I would also offer that LAMB provides for a better elementary track beyond the primary years. Unfortunately I have not heard many positive reviews of the elementary program at CHML. It seems as if quite a few families peel off after primary.
I agree. I don't have a child at either school so have no dog in this fight but I have heard a lot of complaints about CHML from neighbors and friends, and nothing bad about LAMB ever. For me this would be a really easy one.
Anonymous wrote:Just got a spot at Hearst for pk4. We were in the top five on the wait list.
Anonymous wrote:Go with LAMB. It is more likely that you can make the switch to CHML next year if you find the Montessori at LAMB to be too light for your taste. Unfortunately it is not likely that you would be able to move in the opposite direction. I would also offer that LAMB provides for a better elementary track beyond the primary years. Unfortunately I have not heard many positive reviews of the elementary program at CHML. It seems as if quite a few families peel off after primary.
Anonymous wrote:PPs are right, LAMB is not an AMI school. They are much more closely aligned to the AMS methodology and proud of it. AMS schools recognize that the world has changed in the last 100+ years. AMS schools are not afraid of technology, brain research, special education, diverse learning styles of children, etc...
On the other threads, read what the PPs say about how the children at Shining Stars are criticized for exploring with the materials in ways that are "non-Montessori." AMS schools don't spout that nonsense. Montessori said observe the child/follow the child/trust the child/don't interrupt the child/don't substitute your will for the way of the child. These AMI schools are missing the forest for the trees.

thanks for all the advice. Now it's my time to think things through and choose in the best interest for my son.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I applied to LAMB to increase my chances of getting my child in a montessori program. LAMB had their own lottery separate from the dc school lottery.
If that is the case and you are truly interested in montessori, you need to investigate LAMB's montessori program and how true to montessori they are. The school is not AMI accredited, and they have a mix of AMI and AMS certified teachers. I asked an administrator at the DC school fair about AMS vs AMI montessori and what their theory was and she had no idea what I was talking about. The parent representative also had no clue what I was talking about. In the montessori world in D.C., LAMB is "montessori-light". This may be okay for you or it may not be. LAMB feeds to DCI, which some view as a plus (even though the school is not yet open and who knows what it will be like eight years from now when your DC would be eligible to attend). Some say CHM is disorganized and I have seen posts on this forum about a lack of school supplies. Shining Stars, Lee, and CHM all seem to be on the same page re: commitment to AMI montessori--LAMB, not so much.
(I have no dog in this fight--DC did private montessori and my pk3 DC will also be entering private montessori in September).
Anonymous wrote:I applied to LAMB to increase my chances of getting my child in a montessori program. LAMB had their own lottery separate from the dc school lottery.