AAP also adds strong after-school enrichment opportunities available to the entire school community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get rid of AAP. Those who want an advanced education can pay an advanced rate (i.e. tuition at a private school). There will still be plenty of smart kids in FCPS and teachers will still be able to group kids and work with them at their level. Saves money --- not b/c of the busing -- but b/c we'll have fewer kids in FCPS.
that'd cause a "brain drain" and all the system will be left with are the poorer kids and lower test results - causing even more criticism of the system. See the disenchantment over this very issue on the Montgomery County school threads.
^ AAP keeps the brighter kids in the FCPS system and that is a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get rid of AAP. Those who want an advanced education can pay an advanced rate (i.e. tuition at a private school). There will still be plenty of smart kids in FCPS and teachers will still be able to group kids and work with them at their level. Saves money --- not b/c of the busing -- but b/c we'll have fewer kids in FCPS.
that'd cause a "brain drain" and all the system will be left with are the poorer kids and lower test results - causing even more criticism of the system. See the disenchantment over this very issue on the Montgomery County school threads.
Anonymous wrote:Get rid of AAP. Those who want an advanced education can pay an advanced rate (i.e. tuition at a private school). There will still be plenty of smart kids in FCPS and teachers will still be able to group kids and work with them at their level. Saves money --- not b/c of the busing -- but b/c we'll have fewer kids in FCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It makes perfect sense to me that in a county like Fairfax about 15% of the students will be academically advanced, then loosen the standards a bit to get more blacks and Hispanics into the program and you get your 17-18% figure. Doesn't seem out of whack to me at all.
Agree with this as well. Our school population has also been growing as well.
Anonymous wrote:Okay, then let's go back to a small GT program. AAP kids are not outliers needing special education.
Anonymous wrote:It makes perfect sense to me that in a county like Fairfax about 15% of the students will be academically advanced, then loosen the standards a bit to get more blacks and Hispanics into the program and you get your 17-18% figure. Doesn't seem out of whack to me at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AAP/GT is an unnecessary extra.
Understanding the Virginia Regulations Governing Educational Services for Gifted Students
http://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/gifted_ed/ed_services_plans/understanding_the_regs.pdf
Anonymous wrote:AAP/GT is an unnecessary extra.
Anonymous wrote:The valedictorian of my suburban, middle class high school was one of the early HIV researchers who has contributed greatly to the progress in fighting AIDS. All without a GT program in his childhood. Who knew?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really? Kids who have been identified as being in the top 5-10% of intelligence are "no more likely" to cure cancer than other kids? Ridiculous. Now if you said that the kids likely to cure cancer would do so without AAP I think you would have a MUCH better argument.
What makes you think the AAP kids are in the top 5-10%?
top 18%.