Anonymous wrote:^^^ lol at that place he makes them ride stationary bikes for TV electricity. It's actually heathy .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ you can give treatment but detain until citizenship is checked just as fast as they check for insurance.
If not a citizen treat then send to detention center until payment is arranged for treatment and deportation costs with relatives .
You are giving private hospitals detention powers? Should we build a wall around those, too?
Of course not, at the county detention center then sent to sheriff Joe tent city .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ you can give treatment but detain until citizenship is checked just as fast as they check for insurance.
If not a citizen treat then send to detention center until payment is arranged for treatment and deportation costs with relatives .
You are giving private hospitals detention powers? Should we build a wall around those, too?
Anonymous wrote:^^ you can give treatment but detain until citizenship is checked just as fast as they check for insurance.
If not a citizen treat then send to detention center until payment is arranged for treatment and deportation costs with relatives .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's because the real goal is to disarm law abiding white people.
It's about ideology and central control and has nothing to do with school shootings or gang crime.
The left is evil and guns stand in their way of implementing control without their bloodshed. They are extremely frustrated and feel disoriented when unable to control other people.
They don't care that open carry states see reduced violent crime since safety is not their goal.
The real response to any liberal legislative victory or executive order is to distribute 100000 free guns to new owners and training at the firing range. That would be a constructive way to penalize intrusive , anti freedom advances.
How does a background check disarm law abiding white people. BTW bonus points for bringing race into it. Most of you won't say it out loud.
First we need a universal citizenship check before admitting to hospital, hiring or entering school. If we can't do that more important task, we should save the money and not do any other background checks.
How's that going to reduce gun homicide?
Oh, that's right. It WON'T. Nice attempt to distract but NO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's because the real goal is to disarm law abiding white people.
It's about ideology and central control and has nothing to do with school shootings or gang crime.
The left is evil and guns stand in their way of implementing control without their bloodshed. They are extremely frustrated and feel disoriented when unable to control other people.
They don't care that open carry states see reduced violent crime since safety is not their goal.
The real response to any liberal legislative victory or executive order is to distribute 100000 free guns to new owners and training at the firing range. That would be a constructive way to penalize intrusive , anti freedom advances.
How does a background check disarm law abiding white people. BTW bonus points for bringing race into it. Most of you won't say it out loud.
First we need a universal citizenship check before admitting to hospital, hiring or entering school. If we can't do that more important task, we should save the money and not do any other background checks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's because the real goal is to disarm law abiding white people.
It's about ideology and central control and has nothing to do with school shootings or gang crime.
The left is evil and guns stand in their way of implementing control without their bloodshed. They are extremely frustrated and feel disoriented when unable to control other people.
They don't care that open carry states see reduced violent crime since safety is not their goal.
The real response to any liberal legislative victory or executive order is to distribute 100000 free guns to new owners and training at the firing range. That would be a constructive way to penalize intrusive , anti freedom advances.
How does a background check disarm law abiding white people. BTW bonus points for bringing race into it. Most of you won't say it out loud.
First we need a universal citizenship check before admitting to hospital, hiring or entering school. If we can't do that more important task, we should save the money and not do any other background checks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's because the real goal is to disarm law abiding white people.
It's about ideology and central control and has nothing to do with school shootings or gang crime.
The left is evil and guns stand in their way of implementing control without their bloodshed. They are extremely frustrated and feel disoriented when unable to control other people.
They don't care that open carry states see reduced violent crime since safety is not their goal.
The real response to any liberal legislative victory or executive order is to distribute 100000 free guns to new owners and training at the firing range. That would be a constructive way to penalize intrusive , anti freedom advances.
How does a background check disarm law abiding white people. BTW bonus points for bringing race into it. Most of you won't say it out loud.
Anonymous wrote:That's because the real goal is to disarm law abiding white people.
It's about ideology and central control and has nothing to do with school shootings or gang crime.
The left is evil and guns stand in their way of implementing control without their bloodshed. They are extremely frustrated and feel disoriented when unable to control other people.
They don't care that open carry states see reduced violent crime since safety is not their goal.
The real response to any liberal legislative victory or executive order is to distribute 100000 free guns to new owners and training at the firing range. That would be a constructive way to penalize intrusive , anti freedom advances.