Anonymous wrote:When I saw this thread had continued on for several pages, I thought we had gotten back to the ongoing debate as to whether Banneker was suitable for the children of the well-off DCUMers. Surprised at first to see that the focus was on whether this young man deserved his 5 acceptances and the ensuing publicity. But I guess I shouldn't be.
At any rate, I know that Banneker won't suit every child, but isn't it at least conceivable now that it's worth investigating more closely for your own kids instead if rejecting it out of hand?
Anonymous wrote:
Then you agree that the accomplishment was well-deserved and not surprising, therefore, the media attention was unwarranted.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I saw this thread had continued on for several pages, I thought we had gotten back to the ongoing debate as to whether Banneker was suitable for the children of the well-off DCUMers. Surprised at first to see that the focus was on whether this young man deserved his 5 acceptances and the ensuing publicity. But I guess I shouldn't be.
At any rate, I know that Banneker won't suit every child, but isn't it at least conceivable now that it's worth investigating more closely for your own kids instead if rejecting it out of hand?
I think you need to go back to reading comprehension 101. People were discussing the media attention, not the accomplishment. I'll give you the bi-line: white people are shocked that an accomplished African American gets into Ivy colleges.
I disagree with your summation. One poster -- who is not even from DC -- questioned the accomplishment. Another poster applauded the accomplishment, but questioned the media attention. An overwhelming number of posters congratulated the young man and were happy about his achievement. A side debate about legacies was not material to his acceptances. I don't know how anyone could read this thread without seeing it as a broad spectrum of posters interested in DC schools rallying behind this young man's success.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Should I state the obvious? Before even clicking on the link I said he must be a minority. Sad.
I don't understand your comment. Do you think he's not qualified to attend those colleges?
Also of course you knew he was a minority because the title says Banneker high school.
I don't live in DC proper and have never heard of the high school.
This forum is for discussion of DCPS and DC Public Charter schools. If you don't live in DC, I am not sure why this forum would be of interest to you. But, one thing of which I can assure you is that we are not interested in your racial prejudices. If you find the success of a student "sad" because that student is black, you probably need to find another forum.
I live in the VA suburbs and never heard of the school. Sorry I'm not an expert on DC!
I never sad his accomplishments were sad I sad it's sad that they ONLY reason he makes headlines is because of his race.
FWIW I got into 4 Ivies and made no headlines.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I saw this thread had continued on for several pages, I thought we had gotten back to the ongoing debate as to whether Banneker was suitable for the children of the well-off DCUMers. Surprised at first to see that the focus was on whether this young man deserved his 5 acceptances and the ensuing publicity. But I guess I shouldn't be.
At any rate, I know that Banneker won't suit every child, but isn't it at least conceivable now that it's worth investigating more closely for your own kids instead if rejecting it out of hand?
I think you need to go back to reading comprehension 101. People were discussing the media attention, not the accomplishment. I'll give you the bi-line: white people are shocked that an accomplished African American gets into Ivy colleges.
Anonymous wrote:When I saw this thread had continued on for several pages, I thought we had gotten back to the ongoing debate as to whether Banneker was suitable for the children of the well-off DCUMers. Surprised at first to see that the focus was on whether this young man deserved his 5 acceptances and the ensuing publicity. But I guess I shouldn't be.
At any rate, I know that Banneker won't suit every child, but isn't it at least conceivable now that it's worth investigating more closely for your own kids instead if rejecting it out of hand?
Exactly.Anonymous wrote:
AA kids from low SES, single family homes are criticized if they become criminals OR if they get into Ivy colleges?
What do they need to do to win approval?
- Asian parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
AA kids from low SES, single family homes are criticized if they become criminals OR if they get into Ivy colleges?
What do they need to do to win approval?
- Asian parent.
Thank you! The fact that anyone would even question this young man's achievement is ridiculous!
...and disgusting.
Anonymous wrote:"And as a group they are high achieving since they are the children of Ivy educated parents with all the advantages."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ahem. It is not "common" for any one student to get accepted into five Ivies.
I was accepted from a public school to Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and MIT. I was a working-to-middle class white girl whose parents remained married to each other. I was thrilled and my friends and family were very happy for me. Certainly no story value there, though. I'm really happy for this kid, and certainly his mother should be very, very proud. But it would be dilly to think that his race and her not being married had nothing to do with this story being considered worthy of being published.