Anonymous wrote:Even the Washington Post has referred to "the W schools" -- and they have always been Whitman, Wootton, Walter Johnson, and Winston Churchill.
What sets these schools apart? They still have predominantly white students from upper income homes, and parents will pay a premium to move into the clusters that feed into these schools.
Please see this post about the history of the three W's in mcps. Pls stop trying to put WJ before Wooten.

Anonymous wrote:I will be your MoCo high school historian. I graduated from a W school in the late 1980s. At that time there were just three W schools -- Whitman, Wootton and (Winston) Churchill. There were no magnet programs at any schools and Woodward and Walter Johnson had just been consolidated (hence WJ wildcats instead of spartans). WJ was considered second tier, even below BCC. Very shortly after I graduated, a part of the Wootton pyramid was redistricted to RM. In order to appease very angry parents, they created the IB program. About that time, the county also implemented the STEM magnet program at Blair (which used to be the best school in the county when my parents went there in the early 1960s). Later, throughout the 1990s, as Bethesda became a more desirable place to live for well-off people, WJ's stock rose. It's a great school and one I would definitely select for my own children. However, I did not know that it had entered the W pantheon until I started reading DCUM a couple of years ago.
Anonymous wrote:The traditional 3 w schools are Whitman, Churchill, and WJ. Some people now include Wootton in that group, it is a good school certainly but probably a wrung below those 3.
Anonymous wrote:if you were in whitman district, but your kid got into RM-IB, what would you recommend?
Anonymous wrote:Wonton...Anonymous wrote:I think Wooten is better than Walter Johnson.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most important thing to me is class size. I don't know if there's any place to get classes smaller than 20 other than at privates.
Oh well, I am Indian, so these rules do not apply to my kid.
My kid can go to any school in MCPS and will do well, because I will not accept any namby pamby excuse of a school ranking, class sizes, limited AP classes or a poor MCPS curriculum. My kids go to magnets but I do not think that it signifies that my kids are gifted or the schools themselves are amazing. They go there so that they can get the best education currently available in the county.
I devote time and energy on their education. If just a postal code could make my kids smarter, I would have done that.
Wonton...Anonymous wrote:I think Wooten is better than Walter Johnson.
Anonymous wrote:LOL
How good the school is does not matter - because they are all MCPS schools.
Question to ask is - How good a student is your kid? Can he work hard? Is he bright/gifted/driven?
Then ask - Are you great, supportive parents? Is your marriage strong or will his education get derailed because of divorce/custody issues in the family? Can you give him a solid family life? Is there a chance that your kid will get into bad influences and experiment with drugs and alcohol? Do you value education?
True. Very true.
Anonymous wrote:Any kid will be successful in any MCPS HS based on -
1) How smart the kid is and how hard he works?
2) The home environment of the student and the value placed on education.
.... school is possibly the lowest on this scale. Statistics showing how well W students or IB or magnets are doing is skewed, because these kids are getting/have always got - extra enrichment (tutoring, coaching, museum trips etc) OUTSIDE of school. So, the STUDENTS and PARENTS are the key, not the school.
Very true.
Anonymous wrote:The most important thing to me is class size. I don't know if there's any place to get classes smaller than 20 other than at privates.
Anonymous wrote:if you were in whitman district, but your kid got into RM-IB, what would you recommend?