Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had my second at 28 and I immediately felt like I had aged 10 years. I have NO IDEA how women have newborns at 40-45.
I don't either! But they do!![]()
Anonymous wrote:I had my second at 28 and I immediately felt like I had aged 10 years. I have NO IDEA how women have newborns at 40-45.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The human body prime child bearing age is early to mid 20s.
Thank you for this marvelous piece of advice.I'll just step into my time machine...
Non-sarcastic reply: Why is that every time a thread like this gets going, and a bunch of people say, "Yeah, it would have been good to have started earlier, but things are fine/basically OK as they are" or "No, I'm happy I had kids when I did," someone (who invariably does not know how to spell) pops in with oh-so-helpful "facts" like this?
Women can have healthy kids at 24, 34, and even 44.
Anonymous wrote:The human body prime child bearing age is early to mid 20s.
I'll just step into my time machine...
Anonymous wrote:OP, I don't think there are many women out there who married their high/school college sweetheart and then waited until they were 37 to have kids (by choice). Conversely, not many women puposely get pregnant before they have met an ideal husband just so that they can have kids in their 20s.
In other words, most women just adjust to their life situation and then make the best out of it. I was one of those who didn't get married until my 30s so I had my kids later. I am happy with that because it allowed me to fully enjoy my 20s, establish my career, become financially secure, etc. But all those things are just the benefits of my situation, I didn't set out to do it that way. Had a I met my husband in my 20s I would have had kids earlier and I would have enjoyed the benefits that come with that.
I think the ideal for me personally would have been having my kids around 32 and 35, but oh well, it didn't happen that way and I enjoy the benefits of being an older mom instead.