Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I grew up in a place where all of the houses date to the 1920s and earlier. These houses have period details, e.g. foyers with sidelights; built-ins in the living areas and bedrooms; wonderful old hardwood floors; funny little rooms and nooks here and there. They sit on 1/4 acre lots surrounded by mature trees and landscaping.
I could never consider living in a new, large home because it would feel cold and un-homey to me. I want a yard that has been gardened for decades, and trees that soar over me. I want plaster walls and interesting built-ins. Yes, I know you can have e.g. built-ins and crown molding in new houses, but the feel of them is altogether different from the feel of a house built in 1920.
No thanks.
strange. Do you commute via horse and buggy?
Good one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. I was thinking of houses built after 2010 vs houses from before WWII (even before WWI). No experience with 1950-1970s houses.
so most of the "old" homes around here, Arlington, Alexandria, MontCo, are built post-WWII. If you are talking close in NW, or Old Town, that is a different story. This is not an old town. Until WWII, there was not a lot here. The housing here sucks. Tearing down 1950s ramblers and putting up 2014 building code houses is an improvement (though I can argue with the architecture of the hideous craftsman style houses).
The new Craftsmans are much prettier than the pointy mixed-media things in Pimmit Hills and McLean
Anonymous wrote:I grew up in a place where all of the houses date to the 1920s and earlier. These houses have period details, e.g. foyers with sidelights; built-ins in the living areas and bedrooms; wonderful old hardwood floors; funny little rooms and nooks here and there. They sit on 1/4 acre lots surrounded by mature trees and landscaping.
I could never consider living in a new, large home because it would feel cold and un-homey to me. I want a yard that has been gardened for decades, and trees that soar over me. I want plaster walls and interesting built-ins. Yes, I know you can have e.g. built-ins and crown molding in new houses, but the feel of them is altogether different from the feel of a house built in 1920.
No thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. I was thinking of houses built after 2010 vs houses from before WWII (even before WWI). No experience with 1950-1970s houses.
so most of the "old" homes around here, Arlington, Alexandria, MontCo, are built post-WWII. If you are talking close in NW, or Old Town, that is a different story. This is not an old town. Until WWII, there was not a lot here. The housing here sucks. Tearing down 1950s ramblers and putting up 2014 building code houses is an improvement (though I can argue with the architecture of the hideous craftsman style houses).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I grew up in a place where all of the houses date to the 1920s and earlier. These houses have period details, e.g. foyers with sidelights; built-ins in the living areas and bedrooms; wonderful old hardwood floors; funny little rooms and nooks here and there. They sit on 1/4 acre lots surrounded by mature trees and landscaping.
I could never consider living in a new, large home because it would feel cold and un-homey to me. I want a yard that has been gardened for decades, and trees that soar over me. I want plaster walls and interesting built-ins. Yes, I know you can have e.g. built-ins and crown molding in new houses, but the feel of them is altogether different from the feel of a house built in 1920.
No thanks.
strange. Do you commute via horse and buggy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. I was thinking of houses built after 2010 vs houses from before WWII (even before WWI). No experience with 1950-1970s houses.
so most of the "old" homes around here, Arlington, Alexandria, MontCo, are built post-WWII. If you are talking close in NW, or Old Town, that is a different story. This is not an old town. Until WWII, there was not a lot here. The housing here sucks. Tearing down 1950s ramblers and putting up 2014 building code houses is an improvement (though I can argue with the architecture of the hideous craftsman style houses).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I grew up in a place where all of the houses date to the 1920s and earlier. These houses have period details, e.g. foyers with sidelights; built-ins in the living areas and bedrooms; wonderful old hardwood floors; funny little rooms and nooks here and there. They sit on 1/4 acre lots surrounded by mature trees and landscaping.
I could never consider living in a new, large home because it would feel cold and un-homey to me. I want a yard that has been gardened for decades, and trees that soar over me. I want plaster walls and interesting built-ins. Yes, I know you can have e.g. built-ins and crown molding in new houses, but the feel of them is altogether different from the feel of a house built in 1920.
No thanks.
strange. Do you commute via horse and buggy?
Anonymous wrote:PP here. I was thinking of houses built after 2010 vs houses from before WWII (even before WWI). No experience with 1950-1970s houses.
Anonymous wrote:I grew up in a place where all of the houses date to the 1920s and earlier. These houses have period details, e.g. foyers with sidelights; built-ins in the living areas and bedrooms; wonderful old hardwood floors; funny little rooms and nooks here and there. They sit on 1/4 acre lots surrounded by mature trees and landscaping.
I could never consider living in a new, large home because it would feel cold and un-homey to me. I want a yard that has been gardened for decades, and trees that soar over me. I want plaster walls and interesting built-ins. Yes, I know you can have e.g. built-ins and crown molding in new houses, but the feel of them is altogether different from the feel of a house built in 1920.
No thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm an architect and I generally find that the opposition to new development comes from small, bitter, jealous people. I can't fathom having nothing better to do with one's time than attempting to squash some other family's dream. Live and let live.
Perhaps, it's when you put a house ill-fitted on a lot too small and a home not keeping with the character of the neighborhood.
The assumption that anybody that does not like your work or can't afford it is completely pompous.
Anonymous wrote:I have never met anyone who hates homes because they are new or large. I've met people who don't think its worth it to move out of the city to get a bigger/newer home. I've also met people who think most new construction is cookie-cutter and not built as well as older homes. And I've met peope who dislike when nicer older homes are torn down to put in garrish newer homes that are too large for the lot they are built on. But the notion that there's some group of people with a knee-jerk visceral hate of some homes because of their size or new-ness is just not reality.