Anonymous wrote:What grown-ups talk about this nonsense? It sounds so immature. I would want to know whether or not a man I was dating has had serious relationships. To me, that's relevant and telling. I can care less how many random hook-ups he's had.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want to know if this is someone who jumps around from person to person, who attaches no connection or emotion to sex - it is just an act, or someone who sees sex as part of a relationship. How someone views sex is as important to me as how they view money. Past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. It doesn't mean it is wrong or wrong but it is indicative of how they act, their patterns, their attitudes and beliefs about sex, and that is what should be compatible. I want to know about their sexual past in the same way I want to know about their spend/save habits, about whether they have had 2 jobs or a new job every month. If I am looking for a relationship where sex and intimacy and connection are intertwined then I am not interested in someone whose background is primarily one night stands. We aren't going to be compatible. For someone else who loves kinky sex with multiple partners, learning their partner is a virgin who has hang ups about sex might be a factor in determining compatibility. I want to know if they have cheated on 30 different partners or if they have been very loyal and faithful and in 3 long term relationships.
So if someone lies to me about their sexual past, I would consider it the same as lying about their financial past or their employment past, or any other significant area that has shaped who they are, how they act and what they attach meaning to.
Are you this insecure and controlling in other areas of your life as well? I think therapy would be of greater benefit to you, than a partner's past.
No doubt. People have pasts. Their pasts don't necessarily determine their futures. I have a past. I learned from mine and moved on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want to know if this is someone who jumps around from person to person, who attaches no connection or emotion to sex - it is just an act, or someone who sees sex as part of a relationship. How someone views sex is as important to me as how they view money. Past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. It doesn't mean it is wrong or wrong but it is indicative of how they act, their patterns, their attitudes and beliefs about sex, and that is what should be compatible. I want to know about their sexual past in the same way I want to know about their spend/save habits, about whether they have had 2 jobs or a new job every month. If I am looking for a relationship where sex and intimacy and connection are intertwined then I am not interested in someone whose background is primarily one night stands. We aren't going to be compatible. For someone else who loves kinky sex with multiple partners, learning their partner is a virgin who has hang ups about sex might be a factor in determining compatibility. I want to know if they have cheated on 30 different partners or if they have been very loyal and faithful and in 3 long term relationships.
So if someone lies to me about their sexual past, I would consider it the same as lying about their financial past or their employment past, or any other significant area that has shaped who they are, how they act and what they attach meaning to.
Are you this insecure and controlling in other areas of your life as well? I think therapy would be of greater benefit to you, than a partner's past.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why is it a well known adage that both men and women lie about their numbers? to find out the truth you take the men's and divide by two and the women's and multiply by two.
I think it is really unrealistic for the PP who has had 1 partner since she was 16 to even speculate what it would be like to find out that her partner had 25 or 50 partners prior to her and what that would feel like. or how should would even feel if she had had 20 different men fuck her before she got married.
We were once taught that sex was a special and sacred act to be shared between two people that love each other.
how special could it be if you've done it with 30 other people by age 25?
We were also once taught that women reading books made them sterile.
why have feminists devalued sex?
this is what I don't understand.
the one thing they had that men could never get without them - sex - and they just give it away like it has no value. they DEEM it to have no value!
I never understood that
Because you are an old dinosaur, no longer capable of understanding the nuances of sexuality. I think you also watched too much Leave it to Beaver.
everything in life is about sex. except sex. that is about power.
and giving it away takes away all the power.
And you men are on here bitching and complaining about your sexless marriages. Unhealthy ideas like this man's are why. Sex is not about power and to be usedas a tool to take away and play games with.
Don't cry foul when you want your girlfriend to play games and expect your wife to be a tiger in bed. If a woman is tought it is ok to use sex is a tool in her arsenal and then get upset when it's with held because she's already won thw game or she wants control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why is it a well known adage that both men and women lie about their numbers? to find out the truth you take the men's and divide by two and the women's and multiply by two.
I think it is really unrealistic for the PP who has had 1 partner since she was 16 to even speculate what it would be like to find out that her partner had 25 or 50 partners prior to her and what that would feel like. or how should would even feel if she had had 20 different men fuck her before she got married.
We were once taught that sex was a special and sacred act to be shared between two people that love each other.
how special could it be if you've done it with 30 other people by age 25?
We were also once taught that women reading books made them sterile.
why have feminists devalued sex?
this is what I don't understand.
the one thing they had that men could never get without them - sex - and they just give it away like it has no value. they DEEM it to have no value!
I never understood that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why is it a well known adage that both men and women lie about their numbers? to find out the truth you take the men's and divide by two and the women's and multiply by two.
I think it is really unrealistic for the PP who has had 1 partner since she was 16 to even speculate what it would be like to find out that her partner had 25 or 50 partners prior to her and what that would feel like. or how should would even feel if she had had 20 different men fuck her before she got married.
We were once taught that sex was a special and sacred act to be shared between two people that love each other.
how special could it be if you've done it with 30 other people by age 25?
We were also once taught that women reading books made them sterile.
why have feminists devalued sex?
this is what I don't understand.
the one thing they had that men could never get without them - sex - and they just give it away like it has no value. they DEEM it to have no value!
I never understood that
Because you are an old dinosaur, no longer capable of understanding the nuances of sexuality. I think you also watched too much Leave it to Beaver.
everything in life is about sex. except sex. that is about power.
and giving it away takes away all the power.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why is it a well known adage that both men and women lie about their numbers? to find out the truth you take the men's and divide by two and the women's and multiply by two.
I think it is really unrealistic for the PP who has had 1 partner since she was 16 to even speculate what it would be like to find out that her partner had 25 or 50 partners prior to her and what that would feel like. or how should would even feel if she had had 20 different men fuck her before she got married.
We were once taught that sex was a special and sacred act to be shared between two people that love each other.
how special could it be if you've done it with 30 other people by age 25?
We were also once taught that women reading books made them sterile.
why have feminists devalued sex?
this is what I don't understand.
the one thing they had that men could never get without them - sex - and they just give it away like it has no value. they DEEM it to have no value!
I never understood that
Because you are an old dinosaur, no longer capable of understanding the nuances of sexuality. I think you also watched too much Leave it to Beaver.
everything in life is about sex. except sex. that is about power.
and giving it away takes away all the power.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why is it a well known adage that both men and women lie about their numbers? to find out the truth you take the men's and divide by two and the women's and multiply by two.
I think it is really unrealistic for the PP who has had 1 partner since she was 16 to even speculate what it would be like to find out that her partner had 25 or 50 partners prior to her and what that would feel like. or how should would even feel if she had had 20 different men fuck her before she got married.
We were once taught that sex was a special and sacred act to be shared between two people that love each other.
how special could it be if you've done it with 30 other people by age 25?
We were also once taught that women reading books made them sterile.
why have feminists devalued sex?
this is what I don't understand.
the one thing they had that men could never get without them - sex - and they just give it away like it has no value. they DEEM it to have no value!
I never understood that
Because you are an old dinosaur, no longer capable of understanding the nuances of sexuality. I think you also watched too much Leave it to Beaver.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why is it a well known adage that both men and women lie about their numbers? to find out the truth you take the men's and divide by two and the women's and multiply by two.
I think it is really unrealistic for the PP who has had 1 partner since she was 16 to even speculate what it would be like to find out that her partner had 25 or 50 partners prior to her and what that would feel like. or how should would even feel if she had had 20 different men fuck her before she got married.
We were once taught that sex was a special and sacred act to be shared between two people that love each other.
how special could it be if you've done it with 30 other people by age 25?
We were also once taught that women reading books made them sterile.
why have feminists devalued sex?
this is what I don't understand.
the one thing they had that men could never get without them - sex - and they just give it away like it has no value. they DEEM it to have no value!
I never understood that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why is it a well known adage that both men and women lie about their numbers? to find out the truth you take the men's and divide by two and the women's and multiply by two.
I think it is really unrealistic for the PP who has had 1 partner since she was 16 to even speculate what it would be like to find out that her partner had 25 or 50 partners prior to her and what that would feel like. or how should would even feel if she had had 20 different men fuck her before she got married.
We were once taught that sex was a special and sacred act to be shared between two people that love each other.
how special could it be if you've done it with 30 other people by age 25?
We were also once taught that women reading books made them sterile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want to know if this is someone who jumps around from person to person, who attaches no connection or emotion to sex - it is just an act, or someone who sees sex as part of a relationship. How someone views sex is as important to me as how they view money. Past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. It doesn't mean it is wrong or wrong but it is indicative of how they act, their patterns, their attitudes and beliefs about sex, and that is what should be compatible. I want to know about their sexual past in the same way I want to know about their spend/save habits, about whether they have had 2 jobs or a new job every month. If I am looking for a relationship where sex and intimacy and connection are intertwined then I am not interested in someone whose background is primarily one night stands. We aren't going to be compatible. For someone else who loves kinky sex with multiple partners, learning their partner is a virgin who has hang ups about sex might be a factor in determining compatibility. I want to know if they have cheated on 30 different partners or if they have been very loyal and faithful and in 3 long term relationships.
So if someone lies to me about their sexual past, I would consider it the same as lying about their financial past or their employment past, or any other significant area that has shaped who they are, how they act and what they attach meaning to.
Are you this insecure and controlling in other areas of your life as well? I think therapy would be of greater benefit to you, than a partner's past.
Anonymous wrote:I want to know if this is someone who jumps around from person to person, who attaches no connection or emotion to sex - it is just an act, or someone who sees sex as part of a relationship. How someone views sex is as important to me as how they view money. Past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. It doesn't mean it is wrong or wrong but it is indicative of how they act, their patterns, their attitudes and beliefs about sex, and that is what should be compatible. I want to know about their sexual past in the same way I want to know about their spend/save habits, about whether they have had 2 jobs or a new job every month. If I am looking for a relationship where sex and intimacy and connection are intertwined then I am not interested in someone whose background is primarily one night stands. We aren't going to be compatible. For someone else who loves kinky sex with multiple partners, learning their partner is a virgin who has hang ups about sex might be a factor in determining compatibility. I want to know if they have cheated on 30 different partners or if they have been very loyal and faithful and in 3 long term relationships.
So if someone lies to me about their sexual past, I would consider it the same as lying about their financial past or their employment past, or any other significant area that has shaped who they are, how they act and what they attach meaning to.