Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her loan payment is $1800/month, she works full time, and has a child. She probably physically cannot repay her loans. So it's really on the school/lender because they were the ones who made these unrepayable loans to her. I have NO problem with the lender being hurt here. I'm sure that people like OP would love to have their loans restructred to an affordable level - they don't WANT to be deadbeats - but she looks like she doesn't have any other option.
This is exactly the argument that was made about home loans during the housing crisis. It drove me nuts then, and it drives me nuts now.
First off, they are not unrepayable.
Second, why should the lender suffer, and not OP? OP has already said she is proud of herself (and she should be, so far) and she never could have gotten this job without the loans. Assuming that's true (and there's no point in going back and second-guessing her decisions, what's done is done), she has gotten a significant benefit from those loans. She wouldn't be a nurse otherwise. So why shouldn't she have to pay for it?
Third - your post suggests that you think OP shouldn't have gotten the loans. Is that correct? Would she be better off if she hadn't been able to get the loans, and had to find whatever job she could with her GED? OP, would that have been preferable? I'm guessing it wouldn't. So . . . if you don't regret the education, and the job that followed, you really have no justification for defaulting on the loans.
PP, what you seem to be saying is that OP got the benefit from the loans, but you know, it's HARD to pay them back, and she has a kid, so she shouldn't have to. But she absolutely should take advantage of the benefits of the education she got. That makes no sense at all.
I am a lefty, lefty liberal, about as far from a right-winger as you can get in this country. But there has to be a modicum of personal responsibility.
the risk of default is already priced in the loan. I advise my clients to make strategic defaults all the time. It is not a big deal provided the contract is fair, has penalties and recourse. OP should study the agreement and know what happens if she defaults. If she is ok with those risks, who are you to say she cannot? Shut your piehole.
OP here - can you talk to me more about defaulting? According to what I've read online, they can garnish my wages. How do I avoid this?
I've tried all of the above to try to get the lender to lower my payments. They will not extend the repayment terms, they will not restructure the monthly payment amounts to allow me to pay less - I am stuck with this amount that I just cannot pay.
And yes, looking back, those loans were the stupidest mistake I ever made...it's not worth it to have a degree if I'm still going to end up in the poor house because I can't pay the loans back.
So sorry, OP. You should find an experienced lawyer to advise you. A private student loan creditor cannot directly garnish your wages, the way the federal government could do. They would have to actually sue you in court and then win a judgment, and then get your wages attached. Depending on the state you are in, you will be able to protect certain assets and income. It's also possible that once the lender actually sues you (which could take a while), they would be willing to work out a reasonable settlement plan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her loan payment is $1800/month, she works full time, and has a child. She probably physically cannot repay her loans. So it's really on the school/lender because they were the ones who made these unrepayable loans to her. I have NO problem with the lender being hurt here. I'm sure that people like OP would love to have their loans restructred to an affordable level - they don't WANT to be deadbeats - but she looks like she doesn't have any other option.
This is exactly the argument that was made about home loans during the housing crisis. It drove me nuts then, and it drives me nuts now.
First off, they are not unrepayable.
Second, why should the lender suffer, and not OP? OP has already said she is proud of herself (and she should be, so far) and she never could have gotten this job without the loans. Assuming that's true (and there's no point in going back and second-guessing her decisions, what's done is done), she has gotten a significant benefit from those loans. She wouldn't be a nurse otherwise. So why shouldn't she have to pay for it?
Third - your post suggests that you think OP shouldn't have gotten the loans. Is that correct? Would she be better off if she hadn't been able to get the loans, and had to find whatever job she could with her GED? OP, would that have been preferable? I'm guessing it wouldn't. So . . . if you don't regret the education, and the job that followed, you really have no justification for defaulting on the loans.
PP, what you seem to be saying is that OP got the benefit from the loans, but you know, it's HARD to pay them back, and she has a kid, so she shouldn't have to. But she absolutely should take advantage of the benefits of the education she got. That makes no sense at all.
I am a lefty, lefty liberal, about as far from a right-winger as you can get in this country. But there has to be a modicum of personal responsibility.
the risk of default is already priced in the loan. I advise my clients to make strategic defaults all the time. It is not a big deal provided the contract is fair, has penalties and recourse. OP should study the agreement and know what happens if she defaults. If she is ok with those risks, who are you to say she cannot? Shut your piehole.
OP here - can you talk to me more about defaulting? According to what I've read online, they can garnish my wages. How do I avoid this?
I've tried all of the above to try to get the lender to lower my payments. They will not extend the repayment terms, they will not restructure the monthly payment amounts to allow me to pay less - I am stuck with this amount that I just cannot pay.
And yes, looking back, those loans were the stupidest mistake I ever made...it's not worth it to have a degree if I'm still going to end up in the poor house because I can't pay the loans back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which of our politicians allowed this crime? They should be named.
Why is it a politician's responsibility, or really anyone else's responsibility, that a person takes out hundreds of thousands of student loans when they are fully aware that their career choice will never have a salary that can pay off these loans?
Life is all about choices, and there is no shame about going to a state school if that is all you can afford or if the tuition there is the maximum that your degree of choice can support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her loan payment is $1800/month, she works full time, and has a child. She probably physically cannot repay her loans. So it's really on the school/lender because they were the ones who made these unrepayable loans to her. I have NO problem with the lender being hurt here. I'm sure that people like OP would love to have their loans restructred to an affordable level - they don't WANT to be deadbeats - but she looks like she doesn't have any other option.
This is exactly the argument that was made about home loans during the housing crisis. It drove me nuts then, and it drives me nuts now.
First off, they are not unrepayable.
Second, why should the lender suffer, and not OP? OP has already said she is proud of herself (and she should be, so far) and she never could have gotten this job without the loans. Assuming that's true (and there's no point in going back and second-guessing her decisions, what's done is done), she has gotten a significant benefit from those loans. She wouldn't be a nurse otherwise. So why shouldn't she have to pay for it?
Third - your post suggests that you think OP shouldn't have gotten the loans. Is that correct? Would she be better off if she hadn't been able to get the loans, and had to find whatever job she could with her GED? OP, would that have been preferable? I'm guessing it wouldn't. So . . . if you don't regret the education, and the job that followed, you really have no justification for defaulting on the loans.
PP, what you seem to be saying is that OP got the benefit from the loans, but you know, it's HARD to pay them back, and she has a kid, so she shouldn't have to. But she absolutely should take advantage of the benefits of the education she got. That makes no sense at all.
I am a lefty, lefty liberal, about as far from a right-winger as you can get in this country. But there has to be a modicum of personal responsibility.
the risk of default is already priced in the loan. I advise my clients to make strategic defaults all the time. It is not a big deal provided the contract is fair, has penalties and recourse. OP should study the agreement and know what happens if she defaults. If she is ok with those risks, who are you to say she cannot? Shut your piehole.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her loan payment is $1800/month, she works full time, and has a child. She probably physically cannot repay her loans. So it's really on the school/lender because they were the ones who made these unrepayable loans to her. I have NO problem with the lender being hurt here. I'm sure that people like OP would love to have their loans restructred to an affordable level - they don't WANT to be deadbeats - but she looks like she doesn't have any other option.
This is exactly the argument that was made about home loans during the housing crisis. It drove me nuts then, and it drives me nuts now.
First off, they are not unrepayable.
Second, why should the lender suffer, and not OP? OP has already said she is proud of herself (and she should be, so far) and she never could have gotten this job without the loans. Assuming that's true (and there's no point in going back and second-guessing her decisions, what's done is done), she has gotten a significant benefit from those loans. She wouldn't be a nurse otherwise. So why shouldn't she have to pay for it?
Third - your post suggests that you think OP shouldn't have gotten the loans. Is that correct? Would she be better off if she hadn't been able to get the loans, and had to find whatever job she could with her GED? OP, would that have been preferable? I'm guessing it wouldn't. So . . . if you don't regret the education, and the job that followed, you really have no justification for defaulting on the loans.
PP, what you seem to be saying is that OP got the benefit from the loans, but you know, it's HARD to pay them back, and she has a kid, so she shouldn't have to. But she absolutely should take advantage of the benefits of the education she got. That makes no sense at all.
I am a lefty, lefty liberal, about as far from a right-winger as you can get in this country. But there has to be a modicum of personal responsibility.
the risk of default is already priced in the loan. I advise my clients to make strategic defaults all the time. It is not a big deal provided the contract is fair, has penalties and recourse. OP should study the agreement and know what happens if she defaults. If she is ok with those risks, who are you to say she cannot? Shut your piehole.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her loan payment is $1800/month, she works full time, and has a child. She probably physically cannot repay her loans. So it's really on the school/lender because they were the ones who made these unrepayable loans to her. I have NO problem with the lender being hurt here. I'm sure that people like OP would love to have their loans restructred to an affordable level - they don't WANT to be deadbeats - but she looks like she doesn't have any other option.
This is exactly the argument that was made about home loans during the housing crisis. It drove me nuts then, and it drives me nuts now.
First off, they are not unrepayable.
Second, why should the lender suffer, and not OP? OP has already said she is proud of herself (and she should be, so far) and she never could have gotten this job without the loans. Assuming that's true (and there's no point in going back and second-guessing her decisions, what's done is done), she has gotten a significant benefit from those loans. She wouldn't be a nurse otherwise. So why shouldn't she have to pay for it?
Third - your post suggests that you think OP shouldn't have gotten the loans. Is that correct? Would she be better off if she hadn't been able to get the loans, and had to find whatever job she could with her GED? OP, would that have been preferable? I'm guessing it wouldn't. So . . . if you don't regret the education, and the job that followed, you really have no justification for defaulting on the loans.
PP, what you seem to be saying is that OP got the benefit from the loans, but you know, it's HARD to pay them back, and she has a kid, so she shouldn't have to. But she absolutely should take advantage of the benefits of the education she got. That makes no sense at all.
I am a lefty, lefty liberal, about as far from a right-winger as you can get in this country. But there has to be a modicum of personal responsibility.
Very well written post. Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Her loan payment is $1800/month, she works full time, and has a child. She probably physically cannot repay her loans. So it's really on the school/lender because they were the ones who made these unrepayable loans to her. I have NO problem with the lender being hurt here. I'm sure that people like OP would love to have their loans restructred to an affordable level - they don't WANT to be deadbeats - but she looks like she doesn't have any other option.
This is exactly the argument that was made about home loans during the housing crisis. It drove me nuts then, and it drives me nuts now.
First off, they are not unrepayable.
Second, why should the lender suffer, and not OP? OP has already said she is proud of herself (and she should be, so far) and she never could have gotten this job without the loans. Assuming that's true (and there's no point in going back and second-guessing her decisions, what's done is done), she has gotten a significant benefit from those loans. She wouldn't be a nurse otherwise. So why shouldn't she have to pay for it?
Third - your post suggests that you think OP shouldn't have gotten the loans. Is that correct? Would she be better off if she hadn't been able to get the loans, and had to find whatever job she could with her GED? OP, would that have been preferable? I'm guessing it wouldn't. So . . . if you don't regret the education, and the job that followed, you really have no justification for defaulting on the loans.
PP, what you seem to be saying is that OP got the benefit from the loans, but you know, it's HARD to pay them back, and she has a kid, so she shouldn't have to. But she absolutely should take advantage of the benefits of the education she got. That makes no sense at all.
I am a lefty, lefty liberal, about as far from a right-winger as you can get in this country. But there has to be a modicum of personal responsibility.
Anonymous wrote:Her loan payment is $1800/month, she works full time, and has a child. She probably physically cannot repay her loans. So it's really on the school/lender because they were the ones who made these unrepayable loans to her. I have NO problem with the lender being hurt here. I'm sure that people like OP would love to have their loans restructred to an affordable level - they don't WANT to be deadbeats - but she looks like she doesn't have any other option.
This is exactly the argument that was made about home loans during the housing crisis. It drove me nuts then, and it drives me nuts now.
First off, they are not unrepayable.
Second, why should the lender suffer, and not OP? OP has already said she is proud of herself (and she should be, so far) and she never could have gotten this job without the loans. Assuming that's true (and there's no point in going back and second-guessing her decisions, what's done is done), she has gotten a significant benefit from those loans. She wouldn't be a nurse otherwise. So why shouldn't she have to pay for it?
Third - your post suggests that you think OP shouldn't have gotten the loans. Is that correct? Would she be better off if she hadn't been able to get the loans, and had to find whatever job she could with her GED? OP, would that have been preferable? I'm guessing it wouldn't. So . . . if you don't regret the education, and the job that followed, you really have no justification for defaulting on the loans.
PP, what you seem to be saying is that OP got the benefit from the loans, but you know, it's HARD to pay them back, and she has a kid, so she shouldn't have to. But she absolutely should take advantage of the benefits of the education she got. That makes no sense at all.
I am a lefty, lefty liberal, about as far from a right-winger as you can get in this country. But there has to be a modicum of personal responsibility.
Her loan payment is $1800/month, she works full time, and has a child. She probably physically cannot repay her loans. So it's really on the school/lender because they were the ones who made these unrepayable loans to her. I have NO problem with the lender being hurt here. I'm sure that people like OP would love to have their loans restructred to an affordable level - they don't WANT to be deadbeats - but she looks like she doesn't have any other option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which of our politicians allowed this crime? They should be named.
Why is it a politician's responsibility, or really anyone else's responsibility, that a person takes out hundreds of thousands of student loans when they are fully aware that their career choice will never have a salary that can pay off these loans?
Life is all about choices, and there is no shame about going to a state school if that is all you can afford or if the tuition there is the maximum that your degree of choice can support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG People, give this woman a break. Are you freaking serious? Do you know how hard it is to be a single mom and go to school and be 17? I am a single mother, I am 30, I tried taking classes online for my job and I couldn’t do it, I had to withdraw. Thank God I had my degrees before being a mother! Do you guys remember what it’s like being 17 with zero guidance??? This woman was put out of her house and had probably never been on her own before, found herself with a baby and ZERO guidance about wht to do, of course she will fall for the first person telling her, just sign here and you will get an education. At 17, I had my parents guidance while choosing a college, a major, everything and I probably would have made poor choices if I were completely on my own with a baby! Yes, she did not understand at 17 the implications of these loans, I am pretty sure if she had, she would not have taken them. Kuddos to her for turning her life around and trying to better herself, and you know what, she might freaking save your life one day while you’re laying in some ER, the horror![]()
![]()
Op, i don't have much advice but negotiation? Is there a way you can call the companies and tell them you need to drop the monthly payments because you can not afford them? There has to be some sort of payment they offer to people who can not afford a high payment of $1800 a month. Try to contact some nonprofits who help people with debt repayment programs, they also might be able to guide you or at least call these companies and get a lower payment on your behalf. Good luck to you
I agree with all of this. And yet, I can't find in here one single reason she should not have to repay her loans.